This fixes my favorite annoyance with the git rpm packaging: don't pull
in tla when I say yum install git! You wouldn't expect yum install gcc
to pull in gcc-gfortran, right?
With this change, and blanket 'yum update' will automatically pull in the
new 'git' package and push out the old 'git-core', and if the old 'git'
package was installed 'git-all' will be pulled in instead. A couple of
things do break though: 'yum update git-core', because yum behaves
differently when given a specific package name - it doesn't follow obsoletes.
Instead, 'yum install git' will pull in the new git rpm, which will then
push out the old 'git-core'. Similarly, to get the newest version of
the meta package, 'yum install git-all' will install git-all, which then
pushes out the old 'git' meta package.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without explicit version deps in the rpm spec file, 'yum update git'
effectively does nothing. Require explicit versions of the subpackages,
so that they get pulled in on an update.
Signed-off-by: James Bowes <jbowes@dangerouslyinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
RPM build broke with "File not found" error on git-gui.1 and git-citool.1
They actually are git-gui.1.gz and git-citool.1.gz
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jakub Narebski pointed out that the git-gui blame viewer is not a
widely known feature, but is incredibly useful. Part of the issue
is advertising. Up until now we haven't even referenced git-gui from
within the core Git manual pages, mostly because I just wasn't sure
how I wanted to supply git-gui documentation to end-users, or how
that documentation should integrate with the core Git documentation.
Based upon Jakub's comment that many users may not even know that
the gui is available in a stock Git distribution I'm offering up
two basic manual pages: git-citool and git-gui. These should offer
enough of a starting point for users to identify that the gui exists,
and how to start it. Future releases of git-gui may contain their
own documentation system available from within a running git-gui.
But not today.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This uses "git-apply --whitespace=strip" to fix whitespace errors that have
crept in to our source files over time. There are a few files that need
to have trailing whitespaces (most notably, test vectors). The results
still passes the test, and build result in Documentation/ area is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-svn: don't attempt to minimize URLs by default
git-svn: fix segfaults due to initial SVN pool being cleared
git-svn: clean up caching of SVN::Ra functions
git-svn: don't drop the username from URLs when dcommit is run
RPM spec: include files in technical/ to package.
Remove stale non-static-inline prototype for tree_entry_extract()
git-config: test for 'do not forget "a.b.var" ends "a.var" section'.
git-config: do not forget seeing "a.b.var" means we are out of "a.var" section.
Not only that they are interesting to users, some of the
files are linked to by the included "Git User's Manual"
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
RPM packages did not include howto files which causes broken
links in howto-index.html
Signed-off-by: Quy Tonthat <qtonthat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* maint:
Documentation/git-reset.txt: suggest git commit --amend in example.
Build RPM with ETC_GITCONFIG=/etc/gitconfig
Ignore all man sections as they are generated files.
Fix typo in git-am: s/Was is/Was it/
Reverse the order of -b and --track in the man page.
dir.c(common_prefix): Fix two bugs
Conflicts:
git.spec.in
We don't have a copy of subprocess.py anymore, so we removed that
option from the Makefile. Let's not leave that cruft around the RPM
spec file either.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If not, the binaries get built once with the correct CFLAGS, and then again
with the ones in the Makefile when installing
Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now that we have git-merge-file, an RCS merge lookalike, we no longer
need it. So long, merge, and thanks for all the fish!
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Grabbing anything that had *arch* in its name into git-arch
package was a wrong idea and we lost git-archive from git-core
by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Install it as a vendor package. Remove .packlist, perllocal.pod,
Git.bs. Require perl(Error) for building so that our Error.pm is not
installed.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After 567ffeb772 and
4bc87a28be, git-send-email no
longer requires any non-standard Perl modules, so there's no
reason to special-case it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
That way we avoid any confusion with "GNU Interactive Tools", and it's
more descriptive anyway (the rpm documentation talks about how git is
split into a "core" part and an "SCM" part, this makes it clear that
this is the core one).
targets: git.spec, dist, and rpm. A simple 'make rpm' will build the rpm.
Also adds git.spec.in which is used to generate git.spec.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
