git-commit-vandalism/t/t4126-apply-empty.sh
Junio C Hamano 032bea55a3 builtin-apply: do not declare patch is creation when we do not know it
When we see no context nor deleted line in the patch, we used to declare
that the patch creates a new file.  But some people create an empty file
and then apply a patch to it.  Similarly, a patch that delete everything
is not a deletion patch either.

This commit corrects these two issues.  Together with the previous commit,
it allows a diff between an empty file and a line-ful file to be treated
as both creation patch and "add stuff to an existing empty file",
depending on the context.  A new test t4126 demonstrates the fix.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-17 02:57:33 -07:00

62 lines
1.1 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/sh
test_description='apply empty'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
>empty &&
git add empty &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m initial &&
for i in a b c d e
do
echo $i
done >empty &&
cat empty >expect &&
git diff |
sed -e "/^diff --git/d" \
-e "/^index /d" \
-e "s|a/empty|empty.orig|" \
-e "s|b/empty|empty|" >patch0 &&
sed -e "s|empty|missing|" patch0 >patch1 &&
>empty &&
git update-index --refresh
'
test_expect_success 'apply empty' '
git reset --hard &&
>empty &&
rm -f missing &&
git apply patch0 &&
test_cmp expect empty
'
test_expect_success 'apply --index empty' '
git reset --hard &&
>empty &&
rm -f missing &&
git apply --index patch0 &&
test_cmp expect empty &&
git diff --exit-code
'
test_expect_success 'apply create' '
git reset --hard &&
>empty &&
rm -f missing &&
git apply patch1 &&
test_cmp expect missing
'
test_expect_success 'apply --index create' '
git reset --hard &&
>empty &&
rm -f missing &&
git apply --index patch1 &&
test_cmp expect missing &&
git diff --exit-code
'
test_done