31cbb5d961
* kh/commit: (33 commits) git-commit --allow-empty git-commit: Allow to amend a merge commit that does not change the tree quote_path: fix collapsing of relative paths Make git status usage say git status instead of git commit Fix --signoff in builtin-commit differently. git-commit: clean up die messages Do not generate full commit log message if it is not going to be used Remove git-status from list of scripts as it is builtin Fix off-by-one error when truncating the diff out of the commit message. builtin-commit.c: export GIT_INDEX_FILE for launch_editor as well. Add a few more tests for git-commit builtin-commit: Include the diff in the commit message when verbose. builtin-commit: fix partial-commit support Fix add_files_to_cache() to take pathspec, not user specified list of files Export three helper functions from ls-files builtin-commit: run commit-msg hook with correct message file builtin-commit: do not color status output shown in the message template file_exists(): dangling symlinks do exist Replace "runstatus" with "status" in the tests t7501-commit: Add test for git commit <file> with dirty index. ... |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
blameview | ||
completion | ||
continuous | ||
convert-objects | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
gitview | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
p4import | ||
patches | ||
stats | ||
vim | ||
workdir | ||
README | ||
remotes2config.sh |
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc