0849541268
Take advantage of test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output rather than using for-loops or a series of `echo` commands. Not only is test_write_lines() a natural fit for such a task, but there is less opportunity for a broken &&-chain. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
108 lines
2.4 KiB
Bash
Executable File
108 lines
2.4 KiB
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/sh
|
|
#
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
test_description='git apply with rejects
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success setup '
|
|
test_write_lines 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 >file1 &&
|
|
cat file1 >saved.file1 &&
|
|
git update-index --add file1 &&
|
|
git commit -m initial &&
|
|
|
|
test_write_lines 1 2 A B 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 D 21 >file1 &&
|
|
git diff >patch.1 &&
|
|
cat file1 >clean &&
|
|
|
|
test_write_lines 1 E 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 F 21 >expected &&
|
|
|
|
mv file1 file2 &&
|
|
git update-index --add --remove file1 file2 &&
|
|
git diff -M HEAD >patch.2 &&
|
|
|
|
rm -f file1 file2 &&
|
|
mv saved.file1 file1 &&
|
|
git update-index --add --remove file1 file2 &&
|
|
|
|
test_write_lines 1 E 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 F 21 >file1 &&
|
|
|
|
cat file1 >saved.file1
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply --reject is incompatible with --3way' '
|
|
test_when_finished "cat saved.file1 >file1" &&
|
|
git diff >patch.0 &&
|
|
git checkout file1 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git apply --reject --3way patch.0 &&
|
|
git diff --exit-code
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply without --reject should fail' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git apply patch.1 &&
|
|
test_cmp file1 saved.file1
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply without --reject should fail' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git apply --verbose patch.1 &&
|
|
test_cmp file1 saved.file1
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply with --reject should fail but update the file' '
|
|
|
|
cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
|
|
rm -f file1.rej file2.rej &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git apply --reject patch.1 &&
|
|
test_cmp expected file1 &&
|
|
|
|
test_path_is_file file1.rej &&
|
|
test_path_is_missing file2.rej
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply with --reject should fail but update the file' '
|
|
|
|
cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
|
|
rm -f file1.rej file2.rej file2 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git apply --reject patch.2 >rejects &&
|
|
test_path_is_missing file1 &&
|
|
test_cmp expected file2 &&
|
|
|
|
test_path_is_file file2.rej &&
|
|
test_path_is_missing file1.rej
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'the same test with --verbose' '
|
|
|
|
cat saved.file1 >file1 &&
|
|
rm -f file1.rej file2.rej file2 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git apply --reject --verbose patch.2 >rejects &&
|
|
test_path_is_missing file1 &&
|
|
test_cmp expected file2 &&
|
|
|
|
test_path_is_file file2.rej &&
|
|
test_path_is_missing file1.rej
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'apply cleanly with --verbose' '
|
|
|
|
git cat-file -p HEAD:file1 >file1 &&
|
|
rm -f file?.rej file2 &&
|
|
|
|
git apply --verbose patch.1 &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp file1 clean
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_done
|