git-commit-vandalism/contrib
Shawn O. Pearce db8a9ff038 bash completion: Resolve git show ref:path<tab> losing ref: portion
Linus reported that the bash completion for git show often dropped
the ref portion of the argument (stuff before the :) when trying
to complete a file name of a file in another branch or tag.

Björn Steinbrink tracked it down to the gvfs completion script
which comes standard on many Fedora Core based systems.  That is
removing : from COMP_WORDBREAKS, making readline treat the entire
argument (including the ref) as the name that must be completed.
When the git completion routines supplied a completion of just the
filename, readline replaced everything.

Since Git users often need to use "ref:path" or "ref:ref" sort of
arguments, and expect completion support on both sides of the :
we really want the : in COMP_WORDBREAKS to provide a good user
experience.  This is also the default that ships with bash as it
can be useful in other contexts, such as rcp/scp.

We now try to add : back to COMP_WORDBREAKS if it has been removed
by a script that loaded before us.  However if this doesn't work
(as the : is stripped after we load) we fallback in the completion
routines to include "ref:" as part of the prefix for completions,
allowing readine to fully insert the argument the user wanted.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-14 23:35:18 -07:00
..
blameview War on whitespace 2007-06-07 00:04:01 -07:00
completion bash completion: Resolve git show ref:path<tab> losing ref: portion 2008-07-14 23:35:18 -07:00
continuous contrib/continuous: a continuous integration build manager 2007-03-19 22:21:19 -07:00
convert-objects Move convert-objects to contrib. 2007-09-25 17:34:12 -07:00
emacs Revert "git.el: Set process-environment instead of invoking env" 2008-06-02 19:07:12 -07:00
examples Merge branch 'db/clone-in-c' 2008-05-25 13:41:37 -07:00
fast-import git-p4: Handle Windows EOLs properly after removal of p4 submit template handling. 2008-03-28 16:27:39 +01:00
gitview gitview: import only one of gtksourceview and gtksourceview2 2007-11-19 23:24:34 -08:00
hg-to-git hg-to-git: add --verbose option 2008-05-26 10:43:39 -07:00
hooks Ignore no-op changes in paranoid update hook 2008-05-25 20:29:30 -07:00
p4import Demote git-p4import to contrib status. 2007-07-15 15:23:37 -07:00
patches INSTALL: add warning on docbook-xsl 1.72 and 1.73 2007-08-04 01:55:08 -07:00
stats add storage size output to 'git verify-pack -v' 2008-03-01 01:44:46 -08:00
vim contrib/vim: update syntax for changed commit template 2007-01-22 20:40:26 -08:00
workdir git-new-workdir: Share SVN meta data between work dirs and the repository 2008-03-15 00:05:18 -07:00
README War on whitespace 2007-06-07 00:04:01 -07:00
remotes2config.sh contrib: Make remotes2config.sh script more robust 2007-12-04 14:35:08 -08:00

Contributed Software

Although these pieces are available as part of the official git
source tree, they are in somewhat different status.  The
intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe
even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them,
and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved
faster.

I am not expecting to touch these myself that much.  As far as
my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are
owned by their respective primary authors.  I am willing to help
if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners"
have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to
fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree
owners.  IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for
enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so
just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch.  If
you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be
first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author
should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer).
This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a
lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the
drill.

I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area
to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming
projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory.  On
the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused
and inactive ones from time to time.

If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose
it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves
there are some general interests (it does not have to be a
list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow
audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose
upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is
of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN
repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport),
submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your
stuff there.

-jc