726a228dfb
The revision traversal machinery typically processes and returns all
children before any parent. fast-export needs to operate in the
reverse fashion, handling parents before any of their children in
order to build up the history starting from the root commit(s). This
would be a clear case where we could just use the revision traversal
machinery's "reverse" option to achieve this desired affect.
However, this wasn't what the code did. It added its own array for
queuing. The obvious hand-rolled solution would be to just push all
the commits into the array and then traverse afterwards, but it didn't
quite do that either. It instead attempted to process anything it
could as soon as it could, and once it could, check whether it could
process anything that had been queued. As far as I can tell, this was
an effort to save a little memory in the case of multiple root commits
since it could process some commits before queueing all of them. This
involved some helper functions named has_unshown_parent() and
handle_tail(). For typical invocations of fast-export, this
alternative essentially amounted to a hand-rolled method of reversing
the commits -- it was a bunch of work to duplicate the revision
traversal machinery's "reverse" option.
This hand-rolled reversing mechanism is actually somewhat difficult to
reason about. It takes some time to figure out how it ensures in
normal cases that it will actually process all traversed commits
(rather than just dropping some and not printing anything for them).
And it turns out there are some cases where the code does drop commits
without handling them, and not even printing an error or warning for
the user. Due to the has_unshown_parent() checks, some commits could
be left in the array at the end of the "while...get_revision()" loop
which would be unprocessed. This could be triggered for example with
git fast-export main -- --first-parent
or non-sensical traversal rules such as
git fast-export main -- --grep=Merge --invert-grep
While most traversals that don't include all parents should likely
trigger errors in fast-export (or at least require being used in
combination with --reference-excluded-parents), the --first-parent
traversal is at least reasonable and it'd be nice if it didn't just drop
commits. It'd also be nice for future readers of the code to have a
simpler "reverse traversal" mechanism. Use the "reverse" option of the
revision traversal machinery to achieve both.
Even for the non-sensical traversal flags like the --grep one above,
this would be an improvement. For example, in that case, the code
previously would have silently truncated history to only those commits
that do not have an ancestor containing "Merge" in their commit message.
After this code change, that case would include all commits without
"Merge" in their commit message -- but any commit that previously had a
"Merge"-mentioning parent would lose that parent
(likely resulting in many new root commits). While the new behavior is
still odd, it is at least understandable given that
--reference-excluded-parents is not the default.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: William Sprent <williams@unity3d.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks