7a478b36aa
The following is the description of -Q flag of zsh compadd [1]: This flag instructs the completion code not to quote any metacharacters in the words when inserting them into the command line. Let's say there is a file named 'foo bar.txt' in repository, but it's not yet added to the repository. Then the following command triggers a completion: git add fo<Tab> git add 'fo<Tab> git add "fo<Tab> The completion results in bash: git add foo\ bar.txt git add 'foo bar.txt' git add "foo bar.txt" While them in zsh: git add foo bar.txt git add 'foo bar.txt' git add "foo bar.txt" The first one, where the pathname is not enclosed in quotes, should escape the space with a backslash, just like bash completion does. Otherwise, this leads git to think there are two files; foo, and bar.txt. The main cause of this behavior is __gitcomp_file_direct(). The both implementions of bash and zsh are called with an argument 'foo bar.txt', but only bash adds a backslash before a space on command line. [1]: http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Completion-Widgets.html Signed-off-by: Chayoung You <yousbe@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
buildsystems | ||
coccinelle | ||
completion | ||
contacts | ||
credential | ||
diff-highlight | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
git-jump | ||
git-shell-commands | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
long-running-filter | ||
mw-to-git | ||
persistent-https | ||
remote-helpers | ||
stats | ||
subtree | ||
svn-fe | ||
thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
update-unicode | ||
vscode | ||
workdir | ||
coverage-diff.sh | ||
git-resurrect.sh | ||
README | ||
remotes2config.sh | ||
rerere-train.sh |
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc