365a00a3f2
I think these are useful, and I think putting them in a new "howto" directory might help some users until we get to the point of splitting up the tutorial to be easier to read. Given the authorship, I think it's safe to put these in the repository. Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
79 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
79 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
To: Steve French <smfrench@austin.rr.com>
|
|
cc: git@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Subject: Re: sending changesets from the middle of a git tree
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
|
|
|
|
> That's correct. Same things apply: you can move a patch over, and create a
|
|
> new one with a modified comment, but basically the _old_ commit will be
|
|
> immutable.
|
|
|
|
Let me clarify.
|
|
|
|
You can entirely _drop_ old branches, so commits may be immutable, but
|
|
nothing forces you to keep them. Of course, when you drop a commit, you'll
|
|
always end up dropping all the commits that depended on it, and if you
|
|
actually got somebody else to pull that commit you can't drop it from
|
|
_their_ repository, but undoing things is not impossible.
|
|
|
|
For example, let's say that you've made a mess of things: you've committed
|
|
three commits "old->a->b->c", and you notice that "a" was broken, but you
|
|
want to save "b" and "c". What you can do is
|
|
|
|
# Create a branch "broken" that is the current code
|
|
# for reference
|
|
git branch broken
|
|
|
|
# Reset the main branch to three parents back: this
|
|
# effectively undoes the three top commits
|
|
git reset HEAD^^^
|
|
git checkout -f
|
|
|
|
# Check the result visually to make sure you know what's
|
|
# going on
|
|
gitk --all
|
|
|
|
# Re-apply the two top ones from "broken"
|
|
#
|
|
# First "parent of broken" (aka b):
|
|
git-diff-tree -p broken^ | git-apply --index
|
|
git commit --reedit=broken^
|
|
|
|
# Then "top of broken" (aka c):
|
|
git-diff-tree -p broken | git-apply --index
|
|
git commit --reedit=broken
|
|
|
|
and you've now re-applied (and possibly edited the comments) the two
|
|
commits b/c, and commit "a" is basically gone (it still exists in the
|
|
"broken" branch, of course).
|
|
|
|
Finally, check out the end result again:
|
|
|
|
# Look at the new commit history
|
|
gitk --all
|
|
|
|
to see that everything looks sensible.
|
|
|
|
And then, you can just remove the broken branch if you decide you really
|
|
don't want it:
|
|
|
|
# remove 'broken' branch
|
|
rm .git/refs/heads/broken
|
|
|
|
# Prune old objects if you're really really sure
|
|
git prune
|
|
|
|
And yeah, I'm sure there are other ways of doing this. And as usual, the
|
|
above is totally untested, and I just wrote it down in this email, so if
|
|
I've done something wrong, you'll have to figure it out on your own ;)
|
|
|
|
Linus
|
|
-
|
|
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
|
|
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
|
|
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
|
|
|
|