git-commit-vandalism/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh

123 lines
3.0 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
#!/bin/sh
test_description='errors in upload-pack'
. ./test-lib.sh
D=$(pwd)
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
corrupt_repo () {
object_sha1=$(git rev-parse "$1") &&
ob=$(expr "$object_sha1" : "\(..\)") &&
ject=$(expr "$object_sha1" : "..\(..*\)") &&
rm -f ".git/objects/$ob/$ject"
}
test_expect_success 'setup and corrupt repository' '
echo file >file &&
git add file &&
git rev-parse :file &&
git commit -a -m original &&
test_tick &&
echo changed >file &&
git commit -a -m changed &&
corrupt_repo HEAD:file
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'fsck fails' '
test_must_fail git fsck
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
'
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in pack-objects packing' '
head=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
hexsz=$(test_oid hexsz) &&
printf "%04xwant %s\n00000009done\n0000" \
$(($hexsz + 10)) $head >input &&
test_must_fail git upload-pack . <input >/dev/null 2>output.err &&
test_i18ngrep "unable to read" output.err &&
test_i18ngrep "pack-objects died" output.err
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
'
test_expect_success 'corrupt repo differently' '
git hash-object -w file &&
corrupt_repo HEAD^^{tree}
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'fsck fails' '
test_must_fail git fsck
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
'
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in rev-list' '
printf "%04xwant %s\n%04xshallow %s00000009done\n0000" \
$(($hexsz + 10)) $(git rev-parse HEAD) \
$(($hexsz + 12)) $(git rev-parse HEAD^) >input &&
test_must_fail git upload-pack . <input >/dev/null 2>output.err &&
run_command: report system call errors instead of returning error codes The motivation for this change is that system call failures are serious errors that should be reported to the user, but only few callers took the burden to decode the error codes that the functions returned into error messages. If at all, then only an unspecific error message was given. A prominent example is this: $ git upload-pack . | : fatal: unable to run 'git-upload-pack' In this example, git-upload-pack, the external command invoked through the git wrapper, dies due to SIGPIPE, but the git wrapper does not bother to report the real cause. In fact, this very error message is copied to the syslog if git-daemon's client aborts the connection early. With this change, system call failures are reported immediately after the failure and only a generic failure code is returned to the caller. In the above example the error is now to the point: $ git upload-pack . | : error: git-upload-pack died of signal Note that there is no error report if the invoked program terminated with a non-zero exit code, because it is reasonable to expect that the invoked program has already reported an error. (But many run_command call sites nevertheless write a generic error message.) There was one special return code that was used to identify the case where run_command failed because the requested program could not be exec'd. This special case is now treated like a system call failure with errno set to ENOENT. No error is reported in this case, because the call site in git.c expects this as a normal result. Therefore, the callers that carefully decoded the return value still check for this condition. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-04 21:26:40 +02:00
grep "bad tree object" output.err
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
'
upload-pack: send ERR packet for non-tip objects Commit bdb31eada7 (upload-pack: report "not our ref" to client, 2017-02-23) catches the case where a client asks for an object we don't have, and issues a message that the client can show to the user (in addition to dying and writing to stderr). There's a similar case (with the same message) when the client asks for an object which we _do_ have, but which isn't a ref tip (or isn't reachable, when uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant is true). Let's give that one the same treatment, for the same reason (namely that it's more informative to the client than just hanging up, since they won't see our stderr over some protocols). There are two tests here. We cover it most directly in t5530 by invoking upload-pack, which matches the existing "not our ref" test. But a more end-to-end check is that "git fetch" actually shows the message to the client. We're already checking in t5516 that this case fails, so we can just check stderr there, too. Note that even after we started ignoring SIGPIPE in 8bf4becf0c, this could in theory still be racy as described in that commit (because we die() on write failures before pumping the connection for any ERR packets). In practice this should be OK for this case. The server will not actually check reachability until it has received our whole group of "want" lines. And since we have no objects in the repository, we won't send any "have" lines, meaning we're always waiting to read the server response. Note also that this case cannot happen in the v2 protocol, since it allows any available object to be requested. However, we don't have to take any steps to protect against the upcoming GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION in our tests: - the tests in t5516 would already need to be skipped under v2, and that is covered by ab0c5f5096 (tests: always test fetch of unreachable with v0, 2019-02-25) - the tests in t5530 invoke upload-pack directly, which will continue to default to v0. Eventually we may have a test setting which uses v2 even for bare upload-pack calls, but we can't override it here until we know what the setting looks like. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-13 07:53:34 +02:00
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to bad want (no object)' '
printf "%04xwant %s multi_ack_detailed\n00000009done\n0000" \
$(($hexsz + 29)) $(test_oid deadbeef) >input &&
test_must_fail git upload-pack . <input >output 2>output.err &&
grep "not our ref" output.err &&
grep "ERR" output &&
! grep multi_ack_detailed output.err
'
upload-pack: send ERR packet for non-tip objects Commit bdb31eada7 (upload-pack: report "not our ref" to client, 2017-02-23) catches the case where a client asks for an object we don't have, and issues a message that the client can show to the user (in addition to dying and writing to stderr). There's a similar case (with the same message) when the client asks for an object which we _do_ have, but which isn't a ref tip (or isn't reachable, when uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant is true). Let's give that one the same treatment, for the same reason (namely that it's more informative to the client than just hanging up, since they won't see our stderr over some protocols). There are two tests here. We cover it most directly in t5530 by invoking upload-pack, which matches the existing "not our ref" test. But a more end-to-end check is that "git fetch" actually shows the message to the client. We're already checking in t5516 that this case fails, so we can just check stderr there, too. Note that even after we started ignoring SIGPIPE in 8bf4becf0c, this could in theory still be racy as described in that commit (because we die() on write failures before pumping the connection for any ERR packets). In practice this should be OK for this case. The server will not actually check reachability until it has received our whole group of "want" lines. And since we have no objects in the repository, we won't send any "have" lines, meaning we're always waiting to read the server response. Note also that this case cannot happen in the v2 protocol, since it allows any available object to be requested. However, we don't have to take any steps to protect against the upcoming GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION in our tests: - the tests in t5516 would already need to be skipped under v2, and that is covered by ab0c5f5096 (tests: always test fetch of unreachable with v0, 2019-02-25) - the tests in t5530 invoke upload-pack directly, which will continue to default to v0. Eventually we may have a test setting which uses v2 even for bare upload-pack calls, but we can't override it here until we know what the setting looks like. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-13 07:53:34 +02:00
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to bad want (not tip)' '
oid=$(echo an object we have | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
printf "%04xwant %s multi_ack_detailed\n00000009done\n0000" \
$(($hexsz + 29)) "$oid" >input &&
upload-pack: send ERR packet for non-tip objects Commit bdb31eada7 (upload-pack: report "not our ref" to client, 2017-02-23) catches the case where a client asks for an object we don't have, and issues a message that the client can show to the user (in addition to dying and writing to stderr). There's a similar case (with the same message) when the client asks for an object which we _do_ have, but which isn't a ref tip (or isn't reachable, when uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant is true). Let's give that one the same treatment, for the same reason (namely that it's more informative to the client than just hanging up, since they won't see our stderr over some protocols). There are two tests here. We cover it most directly in t5530 by invoking upload-pack, which matches the existing "not our ref" test. But a more end-to-end check is that "git fetch" actually shows the message to the client. We're already checking in t5516 that this case fails, so we can just check stderr there, too. Note that even after we started ignoring SIGPIPE in 8bf4becf0c, this could in theory still be racy as described in that commit (because we die() on write failures before pumping the connection for any ERR packets). In practice this should be OK for this case. The server will not actually check reachability until it has received our whole group of "want" lines. And since we have no objects in the repository, we won't send any "have" lines, meaning we're always waiting to read the server response. Note also that this case cannot happen in the v2 protocol, since it allows any available object to be requested. However, we don't have to take any steps to protect against the upcoming GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION in our tests: - the tests in t5516 would already need to be skipped under v2, and that is covered by ab0c5f5096 (tests: always test fetch of unreachable with v0, 2019-02-25) - the tests in t5530 invoke upload-pack directly, which will continue to default to v0. Eventually we may have a test setting which uses v2 even for bare upload-pack calls, but we can't override it here until we know what the setting looks like. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-13 07:53:34 +02:00
test_must_fail git upload-pack . <input >output 2>output.err &&
grep "not our ref" output.err &&
grep "ERR" output &&
! grep multi_ack_detailed output.err
'
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in pack-objects enumeration' '
printf "%04xwant %s\n00000009done\n0000" \
$((hexsz + 10)) $(git rev-parse HEAD) >input &&
test_must_fail git upload-pack . <input >/dev/null 2>output.err &&
grep "bad tree object" output.err &&
grep "pack-objects died" output.err
'
upload-pack: allow stateless client EOF just prior to haves During stateless packfile negotiation where a depth is given, stateless RPC clients (e.g. git-remote-curl) will send multiple upload-pack requests with the first containing only the wants/shallows/deepens/filters and the subsequent containing haves/done. When upload-pack handles such requests, entering get_common_commits without checking whether the client has hung up can result in unexpected EOF during the negotiation loop and a die() with message "fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly". Real world effects include: - A client speaking to git-http-backend via a server that doesn't check the exit codes of CGIs (e.g. mod_cgi) doesn't know and doesn't care about the fatal. It continues to process the response body as normal. - A client speaking to a server that does check the exit code and returns an errant HTTP status as a result will fail with the message "error: RPC failed; HTTP 500 curl 22 The requested URL returned error: 500." - Admins running servers that surface the failure must workaround it by patching code that handles execution of git-http-backend to ignore exit codes or take other heuristic approaches. - Admins may have to deal with "hung up unexpectedly" log spam related to the failures even in cases where the exit code isn't surfaced as an HTTP server-side error status. To avoid these EOF related fatals, have upload-pack gently peek for an EOF between the sending of shallow/unshallow lines (followed by flush) and the reading of client haves. If the client has hung up at this point, exit normally. Signed-off-by: Daniel Duvall <dan@mutual.io> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-31 03:39:02 +01:00
test_expect_success 'upload-pack tolerates EOF just after stateless client wants' '
test_commit initial &&
head=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
{
packetize "want $head" &&
packetize "shallow $head" &&
packetize "deepen 1" &&
printf "0000"
} >request &&
printf "0000" >expect &&
git upload-pack --stateless-rpc . <request >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
test_expect_success 'create empty repository' '
mkdir foo &&
cd foo &&
git init
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 10:50:53 +01:00
test_expect_success 'fetch fails' '
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
test_must_fail git fetch .. main
upload-pack: Use finish_{command,async}() instead of waitpid(). upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end. This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the following observations: - If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself, closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes (which indicate success) and terminates successfully. - If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully. Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list and signals failure to the remote end. - If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE. upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the remote end. - If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list. The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly. This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of an explicit waitpid(2) call. The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the indentation of a large part of the inner loop. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04 20:46:48 +01:00
'
test_done