Translate one message came from git.pot update in 6eebb35
(l10n: git.pot: v2.4.0 round 2 (1 update)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
When the input is UTF-8 and Perl is operating on bytes instead of
characters, a diff that changes one multibyte character to another
that shares an initial byte sequence will result in a broken diff
display as the common byte sequence prefix will be separated from
the rest of the bytes in the multibyte character.
For example, if a single line contains only the unicode character
U+C9C4 (encoded as UTF-8 0xEC, 0xA7, 0x84) and that line is then
changed to the unicode character U+C9C0 (encoded as UTF-8 0xEC,
0xA7, 0x80), when operating on bytes diff-highlight will show only
the single byte change from 0x84 to 0x80 thus creating invalid UTF-8
and a broken diff display.
Fix this by putting Perl into character mode when splitting the line
and then back into byte mode after the split is finished.
The utf8::xxx functions require Perl 5.8 so we require that as well.
Also, since we are mucking with code in the split_line function, we
change a '*' quantifier to a '+' quantifier when matching the $COLOR
expression which has the side effect of speeding everything up while
eliminating useless '' elements in the returned array.
Reported-by: Yi EungJun <semtlenori@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a Perforce server is configured to automatically set +l
(exclusive lock) on add of certain file types, git p4 submit will
fail during getP4OpenedType, as the regex doesn't expect the
trailing '*exclusive*' from p4 opened:
//depot/file.png#1 - add default change (binary+l) *exclusive*
Signed-off-by: Blair Holloway <blair_holloway@playstation.sony.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test for handling of failure when trying to move a file
that is locked by another client was not quite correct - it
failed early on because the target file in the move already
existed.
The test now fails because git-p4 does not properly detect
that p4 has rejected the move, and instead just crashes. At
present, git-p4 has no support for detecting that a file
has been locked and reporting it to the user, so this is
the expected outcome.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test script t9816-git-p4-locked.sh test #4 tests for
adding a file that is locked by Perforce automatically.
This is currently not supported by git-p4 and so is
expected to fail.
However, a small typo meant it always failed, even with
a fixed git-p4. Fix the typo to resolve this.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When detached and checking out a branch again, git checkout warns
about commit(s) that might get lost. It says "If you want to keep
them ..." even for only one commit.
Use Q_() to allow differentiating singular vs plural.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schneider <thosch97@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes "git merge --quiet" really quiet when we call
into merge-recursive.
Note that we can't just pass our flag down as-is; the two
parts of the code use different scales. We center at "0" as
normal for git-merge (with "--quiet" giving a negative
value), but merge-recursive uses "2" as its center. This
patch passes a negative value to merge-recursive rather than
"1", though, as otherwise the user would have to use "-qqq"
to squelch all messages (but the downside is that the user
cannot distinguish between levels 0-2 if without resorting
to the GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY variable).
We may want to review and renormalize the message severities
in merge-recursive, but that does not have to happen now.
This is at least in improvement in the sense that we are
respecting "--quiet" at all.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you create a git repository in the root directory with
"git init /", we erroneously write a core.worktree entry.
This isn't _wrong_, in the sense that it's OK to set
core.worktree when we don't need to. But it is unnecessarily
surprising if you later move the .git directory to another
path (which usually moves the relative working tree, but is
foiled if there is an explicit worktree set).
The problem is that we check whether core.worktree is
necessary by seeing if we can make the git_dir by
concatenating "/.git" onto the working tree. That would lead
to "//.git" in this instance, but we actually have "/.git"
(without the doubled slash).
We can fix this by special-casing the root directory. I also
split the logic out into its own function to make the
conditional a bit more readable (and used skip_prefix, which
I think makes it a little more obvious what is going on).
No tests, as we would need to be able to write to "/" to do
so. I did manually confirm that:
sudo git init /
cd /
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
git config core.worktree
still finds the top-level correctly (as "/"), and does not
set any core.worktree variable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of blindly trusting the receiving side to give us a sensible
nonce to sign, limit the length (max 256 bytes) and the alphabet
(alnum and a few selected punctuations, enough to encode in base64)
that can be used in nonce.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If --signed is not supported, the error message names the remote
"receiving end". If --atomic is not supported, the error message
names the remote "server". Unify the naming to "receiving end"
as we're in the context of "push".
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The use of 'symbolische Verknüpfung' for 'symbolic link' is more common
than 'symbolischer Verweis'.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Rüster <matthias.ruester@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
The three dots in messages where the hash is abbreviated
were misinterpreted and are fixed with this commit.
Noticed-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Long ago, I documented a corruption recovery I did and gave
some C code that I used to help find a flipped bit. I had
to fix a similar case recently, and I ended up writing a few
more tools. I hope nobody ever has to use these, but it
does not hurt to share them, just in case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Setting receive.denycurrentbranch to updateinstead and pushing into
the current branch, when the working tree and the index is truly
clean, is supposed to reset the working tree and the index to match
the tree of the pushed commit. This did not work when pushing into
an unborn branch.
The code that drives push-to-checkout hook needs no change, as the
interface is defined so that hook can decide what to do when the
push is coming to an unborn branch and take an appropriate action
since the beginning.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merges with an absurd number of parents are still a bad idea because
they do not render well in tools like gitk, but if they are present
in the repository being imported into git then there's no need to
avoid reproducing them faithfully.
In olden times, before v1.6.0-rc0~194 (2008-06-27), git commit-tree
and higher-level tools built on top of it were limited to writing 16
parents for a commit. Nowadays normal git operations are happy to
write more parents when asked, so the motivation for this note in the
fast-import documentation is gone and we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"build-time" is used everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Zago <git-patch@agt-the-walker.net>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When stream_blob_to_fd() opens an input stream with a filter, the
filter gets discarded upon calling close_istream() before the
function returns in the normal case. However, when we fail to open
the stream, we failed to discard the filter.
By discarding the filter in the failure case, give a consistent
life-time rule of the filter to the callers; otherwise the callers
need to conditionally discard the filter themselves, and this
function does not give enough hint for the caller to do so
correctly.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git show-branch --topics <rev> <revs>..." displays ancestry graph, only
considering commits that are in all given revs, except the first one.
"git show-branch" displays ancestry graph for all local branches.
Unfortunately, "git show-branch --topics <rev>" only prints out the rev
info for the given rev, and nothing else, e.g.:
$ git show-branch --topics origin/master
[origin/master] Sync with 2.3.3
While there is an option to add all remote-tracking branches (-r), and
another to add all local+remote branches (-a), there is no option to add
only local branches. Adding such an option could be considered, but a
user would likely already expect that the above command line considers
the lack of rev other than for --topics as meaning all local branches,
like when there is no argument at all.
Moreover, when using -r and -a along with --topics, the first local or
remote-tracking branch, depending on alphabetic order is used instead of
the one given after --topics (any rev given on the command line is
actually simply ignored when either -r or -a is given). And if no rev is
given at all, the fact that the first alphetical branch is the base of
topics is probably not expected by users (Maybe --topics should always
require one rev on the command line?)
This change makes
"show-branch --topics $rev"
act as
"show-branch --topics $rev $(git for-each-ref refs/heads
--format='%(refname:short)')"
"show-branch -r --topics $rev ..."
act as
"show-branch --topics $rev ... $(git for-each-ref refs/remotes
--format='%(refname:short)')"
instead of
"show-branch --topics $(git for-each-ref refs/remotes
--format='%(refname:short)')"
and
"show-branch -a --topics $rev ..."
act as
"show-branch --topics $rev ... $(git for-each-ref refs/heads refs/remotes
--format='%(refname:short)')"
instead of
"show-branch --topics $(git for-each-ref refs/heads refs/remotes
--format='%(refname:short)')"
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git prune --worktrees` was pruning worktrees which were non-existent OR
expired, while it rather should prune those which are orphaned AND
expired, as git-checkout documentation describes. Fix it.
Add test 'not prune proper checkouts', which uses valid but expired
worktree.
Modify test 'not prune recent checkouts' to remove the worktree before
pruning - link in worktrees still must survive. In older form it is
useless because would pass always when the other test passes.
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Acked-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In b3256eb (standardize and improve lookup rules for external local
repos), enter_repo() was modified to use a different precedence
ordering of suffixes for DWIM of the repository path, and to ensure
that the repository path is actually valid instead of just testing
for existence.
However, the documentation was not modified to reflect these
changes. Fix the documentation to match the code.
Documentation contributed by Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
wt_shortstatus_print_tracking() calls shorten_unambiguous_ref(),
which returns a newly allocated memory the caller takes ownership
of; it is necessary to free `base` when the function is done with
it.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `filepair` is assigned new memory with any iteration via
process_diff_filepair, so free it before the current iteration ends.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit b27cfb0 (git-cherry-pick: Add keep-redundant-commits
option, 2012-04-20), added the --keep-redundant-commits
option, and switched the default behavior (without that
option) to silently ignore empty commits. Later, the second
half of that commit was reverted in ac2b0e8 (cherry-pick:
regression fix for empty commits, 2012-05-29), but the
documentation added for --keep-redundant-commits was never
updated to match. Let's do so now.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we find an object in a packfile index, we make sure we
can still open the packfile itself (or that it is already
open), as it might have been deleted by a simultaneous
repack. If we can't access the packfile, we print a warning
for the user and tell the caller that we don't have the
object (we can then look in other packfiles, or find a loose
version, before giving up).
The warning we print to the user isn't really accomplishing
anything, and it is potentially confusing to users. In the
normal case, it is complete noise; we find the object
elsewhere, and the user does not have to care that we racily
saw a packfile index that became stale. It didn't affect the
operation at all.
A possibly more interesting case is when we later can't find
the object, and report failure to the user. In this case the
warning could be considered a clue toward that ultimate
failure. But it's not really a useful clue in practice. We
wouldn't even print it consistently (since we are racing
with another process, we might not even see the .idx file,
or we might win the race and open the packfile, completing
the operation).
This patch drops the warning entirely (not only from the
fill_pack_entry site, but also from an identical use in
pack-objects). If we did find the warning interesting in the
error case, we could stuff it away and reveal it to the user
when we later die() due to the broken object. But that
complexity just isn't worth it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ignoring a merge can be read as ignoring the changes a merge commit
introduces altogether, as if the entire side branch the merge commit
merged was removed from the history. But that is not what happens
if "-p" is not specified. What happens is that the individual
commits a merge commit introduces are replayed in order, and only
any possible merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to the
merge commit are ignored.
Get this straight in the docs.
Also, do not say that merge commits are *tried* to be recreated. As that is
true almost everywhere it is better left unsaid.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 20d1c652 (parse-options: remove unused OPT_SET_PTR, 2014-03-30)
removed OPT_SET_PTR, the comment in the header that describes what
the option did to defval field was left behind by mistake. Remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ukhov <ivan.ukhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
