Do not report that an argument to clone's --reference option is not a
local directory. Nothing checks for the existence or type of the path
as supplied by the user; checks are only done for particular contents of
the supposed directory, so we have no way to know the status of the
supplied path. Telling the user that a directory doesn't exist when
that isn't actually known may lead him or her on the wrong path to
finding the problem.
Instead just state that the entered path is not a local repository which
is really all that is known about it. It could be more helpful to state
the actual paths which were checked, but I believe that giving a good
description of that would be too verbose for a simple error message and
would be too dependent on implementation details.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Schrab <aaron@schrab.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A handful of test cases and a corner case bugfix for "git rm".
* jk/rm-removed-paths:
t3600: document failure of rm across symbolic links
t3600: test behavior of reverse-d/f conflict
rm: do not complain about d/f conflicts during deletion
* fc/remote-helpers-test-updates:
remote-hg: fix hg-git test-case
remote-bzr: remove stale check code for tests
remote-helpers: fix the run of all tests
remote-bzr: avoid echo -n
Strip @anchor elements in the texinfo output of the documentation,
as a single document created by concatenating our entire manual set
will produce many duplicates that makes newer texinfo unhappy.
* mg/texinfo-5:
Documentation: Strip texinfo anchors to avoid duplicates
Support "pull from one place, push to another place" workflow
better by introducing remote.pushdefault (overrides the "origin"
thing) and branch.*.pushremote (overrides the branch.*.remote).
* rr/triangle:
remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote
remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault
remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push
t5516 (fetch-push): drop implicit arguments from helper functions
t5516 (fetch-push): update test description
remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string()
"git status" learned to report that you are in the middle of a
revert session, just like it does for a cherry-pick and a bisect
session.
* mm/status-during-revert:
status: show commit sha1 in "You are currently reverting" message
status: show 'revert' state and status hint
The handing by "git branch --set-upstream-to" against various forms
of errorneous inputs were suboptimal.
* jk/set-upstream-error-cases:
branch: give advice when tracking start-point is missing
branch: mention start_name in set-upstream error messages
branch: improve error message for missing --set-upstream-to ref
branch: factor out "upstream is not a branch" error messages
t3200: test --set-upstream-to with bogus refs
When used with "-d temporary-directory" option, "git filter-branch"
failed to come back to the original working tree to perform the
final clean-up procedure.
* jk/filter-branch-come-back-to-original:
filter-branch: return to original dir after filtering
A pattern "dir" (without trailing slash) in the attributes file
stopped matching a directory "dir" by mistake with an earlier change
that wanted to allow pattern "dir/" to also match.
* jc/directory-attrs-regression-fix:
t: check that a pattern without trailing slash matches a directory
dir.c::match_pathname(): pay attention to the length of string parameters
dir.c::match_pathname(): adjust patternlen when shifting pattern
dir.c::match_basename(): pay attention to the length of string parameters
attr.c::path_matches(): special case paths that end with a slash
attr.c::path_matches(): the basename is part of the pathname
Using grep "devel\s\+3:" to find at least one whitspace is not
portable on all grep versions; not all grep versions understand "\s"
as a "whitespace".
Use a literal TAB followed by SPACE.
The + as a qualifier for "one or more" is not a basic regular
expression; use egrep instead of grep.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation says that "If no 'refspec' capability is advertised,
there is an implied `refspec *:*`" but this is only the case for the
"import" command.
Since there is a comment in transport-helper.c indicating that this
default is for historical reasons, change the documentation to clarify
that a refspec should always be specified.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Acked-by: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fast-export can fail because of some pruned-reference when importing a
mark file.
The problem happens in the following scenario:
$ git fast-export --export-marks=MARKS master
(rewrite master)
$ git prune
$ git fast-export --import-marks=MARKS master
This might fail if some references have been removed by prune
because some marks will refer to no longer existing commits.
git-fast-export will not need these objects anyway as they were no
longer reachable.
We still need to update last_numid so we don't change the mapping
between marks and objects for remote-helpers.
Unfortunately, the mark file should not be rewritten without lost marks
if no new objects has been exported, as we could lose track of the last
last_numid.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
They have no content, there's nothing we can do with them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently, that's the only way it's possible.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow re-add of a deleted file in the same commit.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git does not handle directories, renaming a directory is renaming every
files in this directory.
[fc: added tests]
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach "merge/pull" to optionally verify and reject commits that are
not signed properly.
* sg/gpg-sig:
pretty printing: extend %G? to include 'N' and 'U'
merge/pull Check for untrusted good GPG signatures
merge/pull: verify GPG signatures of commits being merged
commit.c/GPG signature verification: Also look at the first GPG status line
Move commit GPG signature verification to commit.c
Update "git send-email" for issues noticed by PerlCritic.
* rr/send-email-perl-critique:
send-email: use the three-arg form of open in recipients_cmd
send-email: drop misleading function prototype
send-email: use "return;" not "return undef;" on error codepaths
"git merge $(git rev-parse v1.8.2)" behaved quite differently from
"git merge v1.8.2" as if v1.8.2 were written as v1.8.2^0 and did
not pay much attention to the annotated tag payload.
This makes the code notice the type of the tag object, in addition
to the dwim_ref() based classification the current code uses
(i.e. the name appears in refs/tags/) to decide when to special
case merging of tags.
* jc/merge-tag-object:
t6200: test message for merging of an annotated tag
t6200: use test_config/test_unconfig
merge: a random object may not necssarily be a commit
Sometimes the chown() function is called even when not needed (This
can be provoked by running t1301, and adding some debug code).
Save a chmod from 400 to 400, or from 600 to 600 on these files:
.git/info/refs+
.git/objects/info/packs+
Save chmod on directories from 2770 to 2770:
.git/refs
.git/refs/heads
.git/refs/tags
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All calls to set_shared_perm() use mode == 0, so simplify the
function.
Because all callers use the macro adjust_shared_perm(path) from
cache.h to call this function, convert it to a proper function,
losing set_shared_perm().
Since path.c has much more functions than just mkpath() these days,
drop the stale comment about it.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The explanation for 'git commit --amend' talks about preparing a tree
object, which shouldn't be how user-facing documentation talks about
commit.
Reword it to say it works as usual, but replaces the current commit.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we have a symlink "d" that points to a directory, we
should not be able to remove "d/f". In the normal case,
where "d/f" does not exist in the index, we already disallow
this, as we only remove things that git knows about in the
index. So for something like:
ln -s /outside/repo foo
git add foo
git rm foo/bar
we will properly produce an error (as there is no index
entry for foo/bar). However, if there is an index entry for
the path (e.g., because the movement is due to working tree
changes that have not yet been reflected in the index), we
will happily delete it, even though the path we delete from the
filesystem is not the same as the path in the index.
This patch documents that failure with a test.
While this is a bug, it should not be possible to cause
serious data loss with it. For any path that does not have
an index entry, we will complain and bail. For a path which
does have an index entry, we will do the usual up-to-date
content check. So even if the deleted path in the filesystem
is not the same as the one we are removing from the index,
we do know that they at least have the same content, and
that the content is included in HEAD.
That means the worst case is not the accidental loss of
content, but rather confusion by the user when a copy of a
file another part of the tree is removed. Which makes this
bug a minor and hard-to-trigger annoyance rather than a
data-loss bug (and hence the fix can be saved for a rainy
day when somebody feels like working on it).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eric Wong noticed that the address at suse.cz no longer works.
We may want to update in-code addresses as well, but let's do
this first in 'maint'.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"submodule summary --summary-limit" option did not support
"--option=value" form.
* rs/submodule-summary-limit:
submodule summary: support --summary-limit=<n>
* jk/peel-ref:
upload-pack: load non-tip "want" objects from disk
upload-pack: make sure "want" objects are parsed
upload-pack: drop lookup-before-parse optimization
The previous commit taught "rm" that it is safe to consider
"d/f" removed when "d" has become a non-directory. This
patch adds a test for the opposite: a file "d" that becomes
a directory.
In this case, "git rm" does need to complain, because we
should not be removing arbitrary content under "d". Git
already behaves correctly, but let's make sure that remains
the case by protecting the behavior with a test.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we used to have an index entry "d/f", but "d" has been
replaced by a non-directory entry, the user may still want
to run "git rm" to delete the stale index entry. They could
use "git rm --cached" to just touch the index, but "git rm"
should also work: we explicitly try to handle the case that
the file has already been removed from the working tree.
However, because unlinking "d/f" in this case will not yield
ENOENT, but rather ENOTDIR, we do not notice that the file
is already gone. Instead, we report it as an error.
The simple solution is to treat ENOTDIR in this case exactly
like ENOENT; all we want to know is whether the file is
already gone, and if a leading path is no longer a
directory, then by definition the sub-path is gone.
Reported-by: jpinheiro <7jpinheiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was some lingering code that shouldn't have been there in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The fastimport plugin was only required in the early stage of
development.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't need to check for duplicate test numbers, we don't have them,
and either way test-lint-duplicates doesn't work in this situation.
Also, while we are on it, enable test-lint-shell-syntax to check for sh
errors.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
