Add a new command "git check-ignore" for debugging .gitignore
files.
The variable names may want to get cleaned up but that can be done
in-tree.
* as/check-ignore:
clean.c, ls-files.c: respect encapsulation of exclude_list_groups
t0008: avoid brace expansion
add git-check-ignore sub-command
setup.c: document get_pathspec()
add.c: extract new die_if_path_beyond_symlink() for reuse
add.c: extract check_path_for_gitlink() from treat_gitlinks() for reuse
pathspec.c: rename newly public functions for clarity
add.c: move pathspec matchers into new pathspec.c for reuse
add.c: remove unused argument from validate_pathspec()
dir.c: improve docs for match_pathspec() and match_pathspec_depth()
dir.c: provide clear_directory() for reclaiming dir_struct memory
dir.c: keep track of where patterns came from
dir.c: use a single struct exclude_list per source of excludes
Conflicts:
builtin/ls-files.c
dir.c
Refactor and generally clean up the directory traversal API
implementation.
* as/dir-c-cleanup:
dir.c: rename free_excludes() to clear_exclude_list()
dir.c: refactor is_path_excluded()
dir.c: refactor is_excluded()
dir.c: refactor is_excluded_from_list()
dir.c: rename excluded() to is_excluded()
dir.c: rename excluded_from_list() to is_excluded_from_list()
dir.c: rename path_excluded() to is_path_excluded()
dir.c: rename cryptic 'which' variable to more consistent name
Improve documentation and comments regarding directory traversal API
api-directory-listing.txt: update to match code
This will be reused by a new git check-ignore command.
Also document validate_pathspec().
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extract the body of the for loop in treat_gitlinks() into a separate
check_path_for_gitlink() function so that it can be reused elsewhere.
This paves the way for a new check-ignore sub-command.
Also document treat_gitlinks().
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Perform the following function renames to make it explicit that these
pathspec handling functions are for matching against the index, rather
than against a tree or the working directory.
- fill_pathspec_matches() -> add_pathspec_matches_against_index()
- find_used_pathspec() -> find_pathspecs_matching_against_index()
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extract the following functions from builtin/add.c to pathspec.c, in
preparation for reuse by a new git check-ignore command:
- fill_pathspec_matches()
- find_used_pathspec()
The functions being extracted are not changed in any way, except
removal of the 'static' qualifier.
Also add comments documenting these newly public functions,
including clarifications that they operate on the index.
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'argc' argument passed to validate_pathspec() was never used.
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Start adopting clearer names for exclude functions. This 'is_*'
naming pattern for functions returning booleans was agreed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/204661/focus=204924
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rj/path-cleanup:
Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...))
Call git_pathdup() rather than xstrdup(git_path("..."))
path.c: Use vsnpath() in the implementation of git_path()
path.c: Don't discard the return value of vsnpath()
path.c: Remove the 'git_' prefix from a file scope function
In addition to updating the two xstrdup(git_path("...")) call sites
with git_pathdup(), we also fix a memory leak by freeing the memory
allocated to the ADD_EDIT.patch 'file' in the edit_patch() function.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A handful of files and directories we create had tighter than
necessary permission bits when the user wanted to have group
writability (e.g. by setting "umask 002").
* ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top:
add: create ADD_EDIT.patch with mode 0666
rerere: make rr-cache fanout directory honor umask
Restore umasks influence on the permissions of work tree created by clone
A handful of files and directories we create had tighter than
necessary permission bits when the user wanted to have group
writability (e.g. by setting "umask 002").
* ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top:
add: create ADD_EDIT.patch with mode 0666
rerere: make rr-cache fanout directory honor umask
Restore umasks influence on the permissions of work tree created by clone
"git ls-files --exclude=t -i" did not consider anything under t/ as
excluded, as it did not pay attention to exclusion of leading paths
while walking the index. Other two users of excluded() are also
updated.
* jc/ls-files-i-dir:
dir.c: make excluded() file scope static
unpack-trees.c: use path_excluded() in check_ok_to_remove()
builtin/add.c: use path_excluded()
path_excluded(): update API to less cache-entry centric
ls-files -i: micro-optimize path_excluded()
ls-files -i: pay attention to exclusion of leading paths
We should be letting the user's umask take care of
restricting permissions. Even though this is a temporary
file and probably nobody would notice, this brings us in
line with other temporary file creations in git (e.g.,
choosing "e"dit from git-add--interactive).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git ls-files --exclude=t -i" did not consider anything under t/
as excluded, as it did not pay attention to exclusion of leading
paths while walking the index. Other two users of excluded() are
also updated.
* jc/ls-files-i-dir:
dir.c: make excluded() file scope static
unpack-trees.c: use path_excluded() in check_ok_to_remove()
builtin/add.c: use path_excluded()
path_excluded(): update API to less cache-entry centric
ls-files -i: micro-optimize path_excluded()
ls-files -i: pay attention to exclusion of leading paths
This only happens in --ignore-missing --dry-run codepath which
presumably nobody should care, but is for completeness.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the HEAD of the submodule matches what is recorded in the index of
the superproject, and it has local changes or untracked files, the patch
offered by "git add -e" for editing shows a diff like this:
diff --git a/submodule b/submodule
<header>
-deadbeef...
+deadbeef...-dirty
Because applying such a patch has no effect to the index, this is a
useless noise. Generate the patch with IGNORE_DIRTY_SUBMODULES flag to
prevent such a change from getting reported.
This patch also loses the "-dirty" suffix from the output when the HEAD of
the submodule is different from what is in the index of the superproject.
As such dirtiness expressed by the suffix does not affect the result of
the patch application at all, there is no information lost if we remove
it. The user could still run "git status" before "git add -e" if s/he
cares about the dirtiness.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This extends the earlier approach to stream a large file directly from the
filesystem to its own packfile, and allows "git add" to send large files
directly into a single pack. Older code used to spawn fast-import, but the
new bulk-checkin API replaces it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ci/commit--interactive-atomic:
Test atomic git-commit --interactive
Add commit to list of config.singlekey commands
Add support for -p/--patch to git-commit
Allow git commit --interactive with paths
t7501.8: feed a meaningful command
Use a temporary index for git commit --interactive
The config machinery already makes section and variable names
lowercase when parsing them, so using strcasecmp for comparison just
feels wasteful. No noticeable change intended.
Noticed-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --interactive flag is already shared by git add and git commit,
share the -p and --patch flags too.
Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git add -u" updates the index with the updated contents from the working
tree by internally running "diff-files" to grab the set of paths that are
different from the index. Then it updates the index entries for the paths
that are modified in the working tree, and deletes the index entries for
the paths that are deleted in the working tree.
It ignored the output from the diff-files that indicated that a path is
unmerged. For these paths, it instead relied on the fact that an unmerged
path is followed by the result of comparison between stage #2 (ours) and
the working tree, and used that to update or delete such a path when it is
used to record the resolution of a conflict.
As the result, when a path did not have stage #2 (e.g. "we deleted while
the other side added"), these unmerged stages were left behind, instead of
recording what the user resolved in the working tree.
Since we recently fixed "diff-files" to indicate if the corresponding path
exists on the working tree for an unmerged path, we do not have to rely on
the comparison with stage #2 anymore. We can instead tell the diff-files
not to compare with higher stages, and use the unmerged output to update
the index to reflect the state of the working tree.
The changes to the test vector in t2200 illustrates the nature of the bug
and the fix. The test expected stage #1 and #3 entries be left behind,
but it was codifying the buggy behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Prepare draft release notes to 1.7.4.2
gitweb: highlight: replace tabs with spaces
make_absolute_path: return the input path if it points to our buffer
valgrind: ignore SSE-based strlen invalid reads
diff --submodule: split into bite-sized pieces
cherry: split off function to print output lines
branch: split off function that writes tracking info and commit subject
standardize brace placement in struct definitions
compat: make gcc bswap an inline function
enums: omit trailing comma for portability
Conflicts:
RelNotes
In a struct definitions, unlike functions, the prevailing style is for
the opening brace to go on the same line as the struct name, like so:
struct foo {
int bar;
char *baz;
};
Indeed, grepping for 'struct [a-z_]* {$' yields about 5 times as many
matches as 'struct [a-z_]*$'.
Linus sayeth:
Heretic people all over the world have claimed that this inconsistency
is ... well ... inconsistent, but all right-thinking people know that
(a) K&R are _right_ and (b) K&R are right.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the "Unstaged changes after refreshing the index:"
translatable. It's displayed under `git add --refresh --verbose`.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the "remove '%s'" message translatable. It's displayed under `git
add -u --verbose`. Also skip the corresponding test when output is not
in the C locale.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the "did not match any files" message translatable, and skip the
test that checks for it when the C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prereq is not
present.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests t2204 (.gitignore) and t3700 (add) explicitly check for
these messages, so while at it, split each relevant test into a part
that just checks "git add"'s exit status and a part that checks
porcelain output.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* nd/struct-pathspec: (22 commits)
t6004: add pathspec globbing test for log family
t7810: overlapping pathspecs and depth limit
grep: drop pathspec_matches() in favor of tree_entry_interesting()
grep: use writable strbuf from caller for grep_tree()
grep: use match_pathspec_depth() for cache/worktree grepping
grep: convert to use struct pathspec
Convert ce_path_match() to use match_pathspec_depth()
Convert ce_path_match() to use struct pathspec
struct rev_info: convert prune_data to struct pathspec
pathspec: add match_pathspec_depth()
tree_entry_interesting(): optimize wildcard matching when base is matched
tree_entry_interesting(): support wildcard matching
tree_entry_interesting(): fix depth limit with overlapping pathspecs
tree_entry_interesting(): support depth limit
tree_entry_interesting(): refactor into separate smaller functions
diff-tree: convert base+baselen to writable strbuf
glossary: define pathspec
Move tree_entry_interesting() to tree-walk.c and export it
tree_entry_interesting(): remove dependency on struct diff_options
Convert struct diff_options to use struct pathspec
...
Currently, it sounds as if "notice removal of files" distinguishes "-A"
from "-u", and there is no mention of the worktree.
But both notice the removal, and only "-A" adds changes from untracked
files. Say so.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
add: introduce add.ignoreerrors synonym for add.ignore-errors
bash: Match lightweight tags in prompt
git-commit.txt: (synopsis): move -i and -o before "--"
Add OPT__FORCE as a helper macro in the same spirit as OPT__VERBOSE
et.al. to simplify defining -f/--force options.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lstfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows better help text to be defined than "dry run". Also make use
of the macro in places that already had a different description. No
object code changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows better help text to be defined than "be verbose". Also make use
of the macro in places that already had a different description. No
object code changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit c84de70 (excluded_1(): support exclude files in index -
2009-08-20) added support for excluded() where dtype can be NULL. It
was designed specifically for index matching because there was no
other way to extract dtype information from index. It did not support
wildcard matching (for example, "a*/" pattern would fail to match).
The code was probably misread when commit 108da0d (git add: Add the
"--ignore-missing" option for the dry run - 2010-07-10) was made
because DT_UNKNOWN happens to be zero (NULL) too.
Do not pass DT_UNKNOWN/NULL to excluded(), instead pass a pointer to a
variable that contains DT_UNKNOWN. The real dtype will be extracted
from worktree by excluded(), as expected.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sometimes it is useful to know if a file or directory will be ignored
before it is added to the work tree. An example is "git submodule add",
where it would be really nice to be able to fail with an appropriate
error message before the submodule is cloned and checked out.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Unfortunately, there are still plenty of production systems with
vendor compilers that choke unless all compound declarations can be
determined statically at compile time, for example hpux10.20 (I can
provide a comprehensive list of our supported platforms that exhibit
this problem if necessary).
This patch simply breaks apart any compound declarations with dynamic
initialisation expressions, and moves the initialisation until after
the last declaration in the same block, in all the places necessary to
have the offending compilers accept the code.
Signed-off-by: Gary V. Vaughan <gary@thewrittenword.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
