The option parser takes argc, argv, an array of struct option
and a usage string. Each of the struct option elements in the array
describes a valid option, its type and a pointer to the location where the
value is written. The entry point is parse_options(), which scans through
the given argv, and matches each option there against the list of valid
options. During the scan, argv is rewritten to only contain the
non-option command line arguments and the number of these is returned.
Aggregation of single switches is allowed:
-rC0 is the same as -r -C 0 (supposing that -C wants an arg).
Every long option automatically support the option with the same name,
prefixed with 'no-' to unset the switch. It assumes that initial value for
strings are "NULL" and for integers is "0".
Long options are supported either with '=' or without:
--some-option=foo is the same as --some-option foo
Acked-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Shell currently does its own manual thing for setting up the $PATH;
it can now call setup_path().
Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git had previously been using the $PATH for scripts--a previous
patch moved exec'ed commands to also use the $PATH. For consistency
"help -a" should also list commands in the $PATH.
The main commands are still listed from the git_exec_path(), but
the $PATH is walked and other git commands (probably extensions) are
listed.
Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We need to correctly set up $PATH for non-c based git commands.
Since we already do this, we can just use that $PATH and execvp,
instead of looping over the paths with execve.
This patch adds a setup_path() function to exec_cmd.c, which sets
the $PATH order correctly for our search order. execv_git_cmd() is
stripped down to setting up argv and calling execvp(). git.c's
main() only only needs to call setup_path().
Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current code builds absolute path strings for each file to
stat(), this can easily be avoided by chdir()ing into the directory.
Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
list_commands() currently accepts and ignores a "pattern" argument,
and then hard codes a prefix as well as some magic numbers. This
hardcodes the prefix inside of the function and removes the magic
numbers.
Signed-off-by: Scott R Parish <srp@srparish.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The field in the args was being ignored in favor of a static constant
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Thanked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Try to avoid a lot of work scanning for excluded files,
by caching some more information when setting up the exclusion
data structure.
Speeds up 'git runstatus' on a repository containing the Qt sources by 30% and
reduces the amount of instructions executed (as measured by valgrind) by a
factor of 2.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These options are supported by git-merge, but git-pull didn't know about
them.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
RelNotes-1.5.3.5: describe recent fixes
merge-recursive.c: mrtree in merge() is not used before set
sha1_file.c: avoid gcc signed overflow warnings
Fix a small memory leak in builtin-add
honor the http.sslVerify option in shell scripts
The called function merge_trees() sets its *result, to which the
address of the variable mrtree in merge() function is passed,
only when index_only is set. But that is Ok as the function
uses the value in the variable only under index_only iteration.
However, recent gcc does not realize this. Work it around by
adding a fake initializer.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the recent gcc, we get:
sha1_file.c: In check_packed_git_:
sha1_file.c:527: warning: assuming signed overflow does not
occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false
sha1_file.c:527: warning: assuming signed overflow does not
occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false
for a piece of code that tries to make sure that off_t is large
enough to hold more than 2^32 offset. The test tried to make
sure these do not wrap-around:
/* make sure we can deal with large pack offsets */
off_t x = 0x7fffffffUL, y = 0xffffffffUL;
if (x > (x + 1) || y > (y + 1)) {
but gcc assumes it can do whatever optimization it wants for a
signed overflow (undefined behaviour) and warns about this
construct.
Follow Linus's suggestion to check sizeof(off_t) instead to work
around the problem.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
No longer talk about Cogito since it's deprecated. Some scripts (such as
git-reset or git-branch) have undergone builtinification so adjust the text
to reflect this.
Fix a typo in the description of git-show-branch (merges are indicated by a
`-', not by a `.').
git-pull/git-push do not seem to use the dumb git-ssh-fetch/git-ssh-upload
(the text was probably missing a word).
Adjust a link that wasn't rendered properly because it was wrapped.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
prune_directory and fill_directory allocated one byte per pathspec and never
freed it.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the branch named with branch.$name.merge is not covered by
the fetch configuration for the remote repository named with
branch.$name.remote, we automatically add that branch to the set
of branches to be fetched. However, if the remote repository
does not have that branch (e.g. it used to exist, but got
removed), this is not a reason to fail the git-fetch itself.
The situation however will be noticed if git-fetch was called by
git-pull, as the resulting FETCH_HEAD would not have any entry
that is marked for merging.
Acked-By: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk: (34 commits)
gitk: Use the UI font for the diff/old version/new version radio buttons
gitk: Simplify the code for finding commits
gitk: Fix a couple more bugs in the path limiting
gitk: Fix some bugs with path limiting in the diff display
gitk: Use the status window for other functions
gitk: Integrate the reset progress bar in the main frame
gitk: Ensure tabstop setting gets restored by Cancel button
gitk: Limit diff display to listed paths by default
gitk: Fix Tcl error: can't unset findcurline
gitk: Get rid of the diffopts variable
gitk: Fix bug where the last few commits would sometimes not be visible
gitk: Add a font chooser
gitk: Keep track of font attributes ourselves instead of using font actual
gitk: Use named fonts instead of the font specification
gitk: Fix bug causing Tcl error when changing find match type
gitk: Fix the tab setting in the diff display window
gitk: Add progress bars for reading in stuff and for finding
gitk: Fix a couple of bugs
gitk: Simplify highlighting interface and combine with Find function
gitk: Fix bug in generating patches
...
This makes the radio buttons for selecting whether to see the full diff,
the old version or the new version use the same font as the other user
interface elements.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This unifies findmore and findmorerev, and adds the ability to do
a search with or without wrap around from the end of the list of
commits to the beginning (or vice versa for reverse searches).
findnext and findprev are gone, and the buttons and keys for searching
all call dofind now. dofind doesn't unmark the matches to start with.
Shift-up and shift-down are back by popular request, and the searches
they do don't wrap around. The other keys that do searches (/, ?,
return, M-f) do wrapping searches except for M-g.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Usually you cannot revert a merge because you do not know which
side of the merge should be considered the mainline (iow, what
change to reverse).
With this patch, cherry-pick and revert learn -m (--mainline)
option that lets you specify the parent number (starting from 1)
of the mainline, so that you can:
git revert -m 1 $merge
to reverse the changes introduced by the $merge commit relative
to its first parent, and:
git cherry-pick -m 2 $merge
to replay the changes introduced by the $merge commit relative
to its second parent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is incompatible with previous versions because an exit code
of 125 used to mark current commit as "bad". But hopefully this exit
code is not much used by test scripts or other programs. (126 and 127
are used by POSIX compliant shells to mean "found but not
executable" and "command not found", respectively.)
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also fix "bisect bad" and "bisect good" short usage description.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also use "die" instead of "echo >&2 something ; exit 1".
And simplify "bisect_replay".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there are some "skip"ped revisions, we add the '--bisect-all'
option to "git rev-list --bisect-vars". Then we filter out the
"skip"ped revisions from the result of the rev-list command, and we
modify the "bisect_rev" var accordingly.
We don't always use "--bisect-all" because it is slower
than "--bisect-vars" or "--bisect".
When we cannot find for sure the first bad commit because of
"skip"ped commits, we print the hash of each possible first bad
commit and then we exit with code 2.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is Junio's patch with some stuff to make --bisect-all
compatible with --bisect-vars.
This option makes it possible to see all the potential
bisection points. The best ones are displayed first.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The double LF were there only because we gave a list of common
commands. WIth the list gone, there is no reason to have the
extra blank line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we do the fuzzy rename detection, we don't care about the
destinations that we already handled with the exact rename detector.
And, in fact, the code already knew that - but the rename limiter, which
used to run *before* exact renames were detected, did not.
This fixes it so that the rename detection limiter now bases its
decisions on the *remaining* rename counts, rather than the original
ones.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For historical reasons, the exact rename detection had populated the
filespecs for the entries it compared, and the rest of the similarity
analysis depended on that. I hadn't even bothered to debug why that was
the case when I re-did the rename detection, I just made the new one
have the same broken behaviour, with a note about this special case.
This fixes that fixme. The reason the exact rename detector needed to
fill in the file sizes of the files it checked was that the _inexact_
rename detector was broken, and started comparing file sizes before it
filled them in.
Fixing that allows the exact phase to do the sane thing of never even
caring (since all *it* cares about is really just the SHA1 itself, not
the size nor the contents).
It turns out that this also indirectly fixes a bug: trying to populate
all the filespecs will run out of virtual memory if there is tons and
tons of possible rename options. The fuzzy similarity analysis does the
right thing in this regard, and free's the blob info after it has
generated the hash tables, so the special case code caused more trouble
than just some extra illogical code.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that the exact rename detection is linear-time (with a very small
constant factor to boot), there is no longer any reason to limit it by
the number of files involved.
In some trivial testing, I created a repository with a directory that
had a hundred thousand files in it (all with different contents), and
then moved that directory to show the effects of renaming 100,000 files.
With the new code, that resulted in
[torvalds@woody big-rename]$ time ~/git/git show -C | wc -l
400006
real 0m2.071s
user 0m1.520s
sys 0m0.576s
ie the code can correctly detect the hundred thousand renames in about 2
seconds (the number "400006" comes from four lines for each rename:
diff --git a/really-big-dir/file-1-1-1-1-1 b/moved-big-dir/file-1-1-1-1-1
similarity index 100%
rename from really-big-dir/file-1-1-1-1-1
rename to moved-big-dir/file-1-1-1-1-1
and the extra six lines is from a one-liner commit message and all the
commit information and spacing).
Most of those two seconds weren't even really the rename detection, it's
really all the other stuff needed to get there.
With the old code, this wouldn't have been practically possible. Doing
a pairwise check of the ten billion possible pairs would have been
prohibitively expensive. In fact, even with the rename limiter in
place, the old code would waste a lot of time just on the diff_filespec
checks, and despite not even trying to find renames, it used to look
like:
[torvalds@woody big-rename]$ time git show -C | wc -l
1400006
real 0m12.337s
user 0m12.285s
sys 0m0.192s
ie we used to take 12 seconds for this load and not even do any rename
detection! (The number 1400006 comes from fourteen lines per file moved:
seven lines each for the delete and the create of a one-liner file, and
the same extra six lines of commit information).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This implements a smarter rename detector for exact renames, which
rather than doing a pairwise comparison (time O(m*n)) will just hash the
files into a hash-table (size O(n+m)), and only do pairwise comparisons
to renames that have the same hash (time O(n+m) except for unrealistic
hash collissions, which we just cull aggressively).
Admittedly the exact rename case is not nearly as interesting as the
generic case, but it's an important case none-the-less. A similar general
approach should work for the generic case too, but even then you do need
to handle the exact renames/copies separately (to avoid the inevitable
added cost factor that comes from the _size_ of the file), so this is
worth doing.
In the expectation that we will indeed do the same hashing trick for the
general rename case, this code uses a generic hash-table implementation
that can be used for other things too. In fact, we might be able to
consolidate some of our existing hash tables with the new generic code
in hash.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The core rename detection had some rather stupid code to check if a
pathname was used by a later modification or rename, which basically
walked the whole pathname space for all renames for each rename, in
order to tell whether it was a pure rename (no remaining users) or
should be considered a copy (other users of the source file remaining).
That's really silly, since we can just keep a count of users around, and
replace all those complex and expensive loops with just testing that
simple counter (but this all depends on the previous commit that shared
the diff_filespec data structure by using a separate reference count).
Note that the reference count is not the same as the rename count: they
behave otherwise rather similarly, but the reference count is tied to
the allocation (and decremented at de-allocation, so that when it turns
zero we can get rid of the memory), while the rename count is tied to
the renames and is decremented when we find a rename (so that when it
turns zero we know that it was a rename, not a copy).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
