* maint:
Update GIT 1.5.3.5 Release Notes
git-rebase--interactive.sh: Make 3-way merge strategies work for -p.
git-rebase--interactive.sh: Don't pass a strategy to git-cherry-pick.
Fix --strategy parsing in git-rebase--interactive.sh
Make merge-recursive honor diff.renamelimit
cherry-pick/revert: more compact user direction message
core-tutorial: Use new syntax for git-merge.
git-merge: document but discourage the historical syntax
Prevent send-pack from segfaulting (backport from 'master')
Documentation/git-cvsexportcommit.txt: s/mgs/msg/ in example
Conflicts:
git-rebase--interactive.sh
* cc/skip:
Bisect: add "skip" to the short usage string.
Bisect run: "skip" current commit if script exit code is 125.
Bisect: add a "bisect replay" test case.
Bisect: add "bisect skip" to the documentation.
Bisect: refactor "bisect_{bad,good,skip}" into "bisect_state".
Bisect: refactor some logging into "bisect_write".
Bisect: refactor "bisect_write_*" functions.
Bisect: implement "bisect skip" to mark untestable revisions.
Bisect: fix some white spaces and empty lines breakages.
rev-list documentation: add "--bisect-all".
rev-list: implement --bisect-all
* lt/rename:
Do the fuzzy rename detection limits with the exact renames removed
Fix ugly magic special case in exact rename detection
Do exact rename detection regardless of rename limits
Do linear-time/space rename logic for exact renames
copy vs rename detection: avoid unnecessary O(n*m) loops
Ref-count the filespecs used by diffcore
Split out "exact content match" phase of rename detection
Add 'diffcore.h' to LIB_H
* ds/gitweb:
gitweb: Use chop_and_escape_str in more places.
gitweb: Refactor abbreviation-with-title-attribute code.
gitweb: Provide title attributes for abbreviated author names.
This has been proposed for a few times without much reaction
from the list. Actually remove it to see who screams.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-rebase--interactive.sh used to pass all parents of a merge commit to
git-merge, which means that we have at least 3 heads to merge: HEAD,
first parent and second parent. So 3-way merge strategies like recursive
wouldn't work.
Fortunately, we have checked out the first parent right before the merge
anyway, so that is HEAD. Therefore we can drop simply it from the list
of parents, making 3-way strategies work for merge commits with only
two parents.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-cherry-pick doesn't support a strategy paramter, so don't pass one.
This means that --strategy for interactive rebases is a no-op for
anything but merge commits, but that's still better than being broken. A
correct fix would probably need to port the --merge behaviour from plain
git-rebase.sh, but I have no clue how to integrate that cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For the --strategy/-s option, git-rebase--interactive.sh dropped the
parameter which it was trying to parse.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It might be a sign of source code management gone bad, but when two branches
has diverged almost beyond recognition and time has come for the branches to
merge, the user is going to need all the help his tool can give him. Honoring
diff.renamelimit has great potential as a painkiller in such situations.
The painkiller effect could have been achieved by e.g. 'merge.renamelimit',
but the flexibility gained by a separate option is questionable: our user
would probably expect git to detect renames equally good when merging as
when diffing (I known I did).
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A failed cherry-pick (and friend) currently says:
|Automatic cherry-pick failed. After resolving the conflicts,
|mark the corrected paths with 'git-add <paths>'
|and commit the result.
This can obviously be displayed on two lines only.
While at it, change "git-add" to "git add".
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Historically "git merge" took its command line arguments in a
rather strange order. Document the historical syntax, and also
document clearly that it is not encouraged in new scripts.
There is no reason to deprecate the historical syntax, as the
current code can sanely tell which syntax the caller is using,
and existing scripts by people do use the historical syntax.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
4491e62ae9 (Prevent send-pack from
segfaulting when a branch doesn't match) is hereby cherry-picked
back to 'maint'.
If we can't find a source match, and we have no destination, we
need to abort the match function early before we try to match
the destination against the remote.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The typo was introduced by 5ac0a2063e
(Make builtin-fsck.c use parse_options.)
Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com>
Acked-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This one triggers only when git-pack-objects is called with
--all-progress and --stdout which is the combination used by
git-push.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
... and call it "Receiving objects" when over stdin to look clearer
to end users.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds the ability for the progress code to also display transfer
throughput when that makes sense.
The math was inspired by commit c548cf4ee0
from Linus.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since it is now OK to pass a null pointer to display_progress() and
stop_progress() resulting in a no-op, then we can simplify the code
and remove a bunch of lines by not making those calls conditional all
the time.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows for better management of progress "object" existence,
as well as making the progress display implementation more independent
from its callers.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The progress count is per fanout directory, so it is useless to call
it for every file as the count doesn't change that often.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are some cases when one line from "raw" git-diff output (raw
format) corresponds to more than one patch in the patchset git-diff
output; we call this situation "split patch". Old code misdetected
subsequent patches (for different files) with the same pre-image and
post-image as fragments of "split patch", leading to mislabeled
from-file/to-file diff header etc.
Old code used pre-image and post-image SHA-1 identifier ('from_id' and
'to_id') to check if current patch corresponds to old raw diff format
line, to find if one difftree raw line coresponds to more than one
patch in the patch format. Now we use post-image filename for that.
This assumes that post-image filename alone can be used to identify
difftree raw line. In the case this changes (which is unlikely
considering current diff engine) we can add 'from_id' and 'to_id'
to detect "patch splitting" together with 'to_file'.
Because old code got pre-image and post-image SHA-1 identifier for the
patch from the "index" line in extended diff header, diff header had
to be buffered. New code takes post-image filename from "git diff"
header, which is first line of a patch; this allows to simplify
git_patchset_body code. A side effect of resigning diff header
buffering is that there is always "diff extended_header" div, even
if extended diff header is empty.
Alternate solution would be to check when git splits patches, and do
not check if parsed info from current patch corresponds to current or
next raw diff format output line. Git splits patches only for 'T'
(typechange) status filepair, and there always two patches
corresponding to one raw diff line. It was not used because it would
tie gitweb code to minute details of git diff output.
While at it, use newly introduced parsed_difftree_line wrapper
subroutine in git_difftree_body.
Noticed-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Diagnosed-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rev-parse --git-dir" trick does not play well with worktree
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there is an option "--amend", the option parser now recognizes
"--am" for that option, provided that there is no other option beginning
with "--am".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
It helps with consistency of the help strings, for example.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* add the possibility to use callbacks to parse some options, this can
help implementing new options kinds with great flexibility. struct option
gains a callback pointer and a `defval' where callbacks user can put
either integers or pointers. callbacks also can use the `value' pointer
for anything, preferably to the pointer to the final storage for the value
though.
* add a `flag' member to struct option to make explicit that this option may
have an optional argument. The semantics depends on the option type. For
INTEGERS, it means that if the switch is not used in its
--long-form=<value> form, and that there is no token after it or that the
token does not starts with a digit, then it's assumed that the switch has
no argument. For STRING or CALLBACK it works the same, except that the
condition is that the next atom starts with a dash. This is needed to
implement backward compatible behaviour with existing ways to parse the
command line. Its use for new options is discouraged.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>