"git log --left-right A...B" lost the "leftness" of commits
reachable from A when A is a tag as a side effect of a recent
bugfix. This is a regression in 1.8.4.x series.
* jc/revision-range-unpeel:
revision: propagate flag bits from tags to pointees
revision: mark contents of an uninteresting tree uninteresting
"git clone" would fail to clone from a repository that has a ref
directly under "refs/", e.g. "refs/stash", because different
validation paths do different things on such a refname. Loosen the
client side's validation to allow such a ref.
* jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname:
fetch-pack: do not filter out one-level refs
A handful of bugs around interpreting $branch@{upstream} notation
and its lookalike, when $branch part has interesting characters,
e.g. "@", and ":", have been fixed.
* jk/interpret-branch-name-fix:
interpret_branch_name: find all possible @-marks
interpret_branch_name: avoid @{upstream} past colon
interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter
interpret_branch_name: rename "cp" variable to "at"
interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling
A recent update to "git send-email" broke platforms where
/etc/ssl/certs/ directory exists but cannot be used as SSL_ca_path
(e.g. Fedora rawhide).
* rk/send-email-ssl-cert:
send-email: /etc/ssl/certs/ directory may not be usable as ca_path
"git repack --max-pack-size=8g" stopped being parsed correctly when
the command was reimplemented in C.
* sb/repack-in-c:
repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings
repack: make parsed string options const-correct
repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option
The pathspec matching code, while comparing two trees (e.g. "git
diff A B -- path1 path2") was too aggressive and failed to match
some paths when multiple pathspecs were involved.
* as/tree-walk-fix-aggressive-short-cut:
tree_entry_interesting: match against all pathspecs
start_httpd is supposed to be at the beginning of the test file, not
the middle of it. The "test_seq" line in "no shallow lines.." test is
updated to compensate missing refs that are there in t5537, but not in
the new t5539.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recent translation was giving the idea that all commits
based on a graft were meant to be hidden. Make it clear that
it is the graft commit itself.
Reported-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
In smart http, upload-pack adds new shallow lines at the beginning of
each rpc response. Only shallow lines from the first rpc call are
useful. After that they are thrown away. It's designed this way
because upload-pack is stateless and has no idea when its shallow
lines are helpful or not.
So after refs are negotiated with multi_ack_detailed and the server
thinks it learned enough, it sends "ACK obj-id ready", terminates the
rpc call and waits for the final rpc round. The client sends "done".
The server sends another response, which also has shallow lines at
the beginning, and the last "ACK obj-id" line.
When no-done is active, the last round is cut out, the server sends
"ACK obj-id ready" and "ACK obj-id" in the same rpc
response. fetch-pack is updated to recognize this and not send
"done". However it still tries to consume shallow lines, which are
never sent.
Update the code, make sure to skip consuming shallow lines when
no-done is enabled.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
See 3e63b21 (upload-pack: Implement no-done capability - 2011-03-14)
and 761ecf0 (fetch-pack: Implement no-done capability - 2011-03-14)
for more information.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pack-protocol.txt explains in detail how multi_ack_detailed works and
what's the difference between no multi_ack, multi_ack and
multi_ack_detailed. No need to repeat here.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's introduced in 1bd8c8f (git-upload-pack: Support the multi_ack
protocol - 2005-10-28) but probably better documented in the commit
message of 78affc4 (Add multi_ack_detailed capability to
fetch-pack/upload-pack - 2009-10-30).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make clear which one is for dumb protocol, which one is for smart from
their file name.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We set the default apache port for each of the httpd tests
to the 4-digit test number of the test script. We want these
to remain unique so that the tests do not conflict with each
other when run in parallel.
Instead of doing it manually in each test script, let's just
set it from the test name at run time. This is simpler, and
is one less thing to be updated when test scripts are
renamed (e.g., when being re-rolled or when conflicting
after being merged with another topic).
Incidentally, this fixes a case where t5537 and t5538 used
the same port number (5537), and could conflict with each
other when run in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Lasse Makholm noticed that running "git check-attr" from a place
totally unrelated to $GIT_DIR and $GIT_WORK_TREE does not give
expected results. I think it is because the command does not say it
wants to call setup_work_tree().
We still need to support use cases where only a bare repository is
involved, so unconditionally requiring a working tree would not work
well. Instead, make a call only in a non-bare repository.
We may want to see if we want to do a similar fix in the opposite
direction to check-ignore. The command unconditionally requires a
working tree, but it should be usable in a bare repository just like
check-attr attempts to be.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Moving to some other directory and letting the remainder of the test
pieces to expect that they start there is a bad practice. The test
that contains chdir itself may fail (or by mistake skipped via the
GIT_SKIP_TESTS mechanism) in which case the remainder may operate on
files in unexpected places.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We wanted to call the upcoming release "Git 1.9", with its
maintenance track being "Git 1.9.1", "Git 1.9.2", etc., but various
third-party tools are reported to assume that there are at least
three dewey-decimal components in our version number.
Adjust the plan so that vX.Y.0 are feature releases while vX.Y.Z
(Z > 0) are maintenance releases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation to "git pull" hinted there is an "-m" option
because it incorrectly shared the documentation with "git merge".
* jc/maint-pull-docfix:
Documentation: "git pull" does not have the "-m" option
Documentation: exclude irrelevant options from "git pull"
The implementation of 'git stash $cmd "stash@{...}"' did not quote
the stash argument properly and left it split at IFS whitespace.
* ow/stash-with-ifs:
stash: handle specifying stashes with $IFS
There is no reason to have a hardcoded upper limit of the number of
parents for an octopus merge, created via the graft mechanism, but
there was.
* js/lift-parent-count-limit:
Remove the line length limit for graft files
"git add -A" (no other arguments) in a totally empty working tree
used to emit an error.
* nd/add-empty-fix:
add: don't complain when adding empty project root
When we figure out how many file descriptors to allocate for
keeping packfiles open, a system with non-working getrlimit() could
cause us to die(), but because we make this call only to get a
rough estimate of how many is available and we do not even attempt
to use up all file descriptors available ourselves, it is nicer to
fall back to a reasonable low value rather than dying.
* jh/rlimit-nofile-fallback:
get_max_fd_limit(): fall back to OPEN_MAX upon getrlimit/sysconf failure
"git commit -v" appends the patch to the log message before
editing, and then removes the patch when the editor returned
control. However, the patch was not stripped correctly when the
first modified path was a submodule.
* jl/commit-v-strip-marker:
commit -v: strip diffs and submodule shortlogs from the commit message
SSL-related options were not passed correctly to underlying socket
layer in "git send-email".
* tr/send-email-ssl:
send-email: set SSL options through IO::Socket::SSL::set_client_defaults
send-email: --smtp-ssl-cert-path takes an argument
send-email: pass Debug to Net::SMTP::SSL::new
Remote repository URL expressed in scp-style host:path notation are
parsed more carefully (e.g. "foo/bar:baz" is local, "[::1]:/~user" asks
to connect to user's home directory on host at address ::1.
* tb/clone-ssh-with-colon-for-port:
git_connect(): use common return point
connect.c: refactor url parsing
git_connect(): refactor the port handling for ssh
git fetch: support host:/~repo
t5500: add test cases for diag-url
git fetch-pack: add --diag-url
git_connect: factor out discovery of the protocol and its parts
git_connect: remove artificial limit of a remote command
t5601: add tests for ssh
t5601: remove clear_ssh, refactor setup_ssh_wrapper
"git fetch --depth=0" was a no-op, and was silently ignored.
Diagnose it as an error.
* nd/transport-positive-depth-only:
clone,fetch: catch non positive --depth option value
When a repo was fully repacked, and is repacked again, we may run
into the situation that "new" packfiles have the same name as
already existing ones (traditionally packfiles have been named after
the list of names of objects in them, so repacking all the objects
in a single pack would have produced a packfile with the same name).
The logic is to rename the existing ones into filename like
"old-XXX", create the new ones and then remove the "old-" ones.
When something went wrong in the middle, this sequence is rolled
back by renaming the "old-" files back.
The renaming into "old-" did not work as intended, because
file_exists() was done on "XXX", not "pack-XXX". Also when rolling
back the change, the code tried to rename "old-pack-XXX" but the
saved ones are named "old-XXX", so this couldn't have worked.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Allow extra space in "is new" and "is separate"
- Fix bug in word regex for numbers
Signed-off-by: Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@redneon.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The prefix_path_gently() function currently applies real_path to
everything if given an absolute path, dereferencing symlinks both
outside and inside the work tree.
This causes most high-level functions to misbehave when acting on
symlinks given via absolute paths. For example
$ git add /dir/repo/symlink
attempts to add the target of the symlink rather than the symlink
itself, which is usually not what the user intends to do.
In order to manipulate symlinks in the work tree using absolute paths,
symlinks should only be dereferenced outside the work tree.
Modify the prefix_path_gently() to first normalize the path in order to
make sure path levels are separated by '/', then pass the result to
'abspath_part_inside_repo' to find the part inside the work tree
(without dereferencing any symlinks inside the work tree).
For absolute paths, prefix_path_gently() did not, nor does now do, any
actual prefixing, hence the result from abspath_part_in_repo() is
returned as-is.
Fixes t0060-82 and t3004-5.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to extract the part of an absolute path which lies inside the
repo, it is not possible to directly use real_path, since that would
dereference symlinks both outside and inside the work tree.
Add an abspath_part_inside_repo() function which first checks if the
work tree is already the prefix, then incrementally checks each path
level by temporarily NUL-terminating at each '/' and comparing against
the work tree path. If a match is found, it overwrites the input path
with the remainder past the work tree (which will be the part inside the
work tree).
This function is currently only intended for use in
'prefix_path_gently'.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One edge-case that isn't currently checked in the tests is the beginning
of the path matching the work tree, despite the target not actually
being the work tree, for example:
path = /dir/repoa
work_tree = /dir/repo
should fail since the path is outside the repo. However, if /dir/repoa
is in fact a symlink that points to /dir/repo, it should instead
succeed.
Add two tests covering these cases, since they might be potential
regression points.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current behaviour of prefix_path is to return an empty string if
prefixing and absolute path that only contains exactly the work tree.
This behaviour is a potential regression point.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When symlinks in the working tree are manipulated using the absolute
path, git dereferences them, and tries to manipulate the link target
instead.
This applies to most high-level commands but prefix_path is the common
denominator for all of them.
Add a known-breakage tests using the prefix_path function, which
currently uses real_path, causing the dereference.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When symlinks in the working tree are manipulated using the absolute
path, git dereferences them, and tries to manipulate the link target
instead.
This causes most high-level functions to misbehave when acting on
symlinks given via absolute paths. For example
$ git add /dir/repo/symlink
attempts to add the target of the symlink rather than the symlink
itself, which is usually not what the user intends to do.
This is a regression introduced by 18e051a:
setup: translate symlinks in filename when using absolute paths
(which did not take symlinks inside the work tree into consideration).
Add a known-breakage test using the ls-files function, checking both if
the symlink leads to a target in the same directory, and a target in the
above directory.
Signed-off-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This goes far back to e84fb2f (branch --contains: default to HEAD -
2008-07-08) where the same parsing code is shared with
builtin/tag.c. git-branch.txt correctly states that <commit> for
--contains is optional while git-tag.txt does not. Correct it.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
