As part of an ongoing effort to make rebase have more uniform behavior,
modify the merge backend to behave like the interactive one, by
re-implementing it on top of the latter.
Interactive rebases are implemented in terms of cherry-pick rather than
the merge-recursive builtin, but cherry-pick also calls into the
recursive merge machinery by default and can accept special merge
strategies and/or special strategy options. As such, there really is
not any need for having both git-rebase--merge and
git-rebase--interactive anymore. Delete git-rebase--merge.sh and
instead implement it in builtin/rebase.c.
This results in a few deliberate but small user-visible changes:
* The progress output is modified (see t3406 and t3420 for examples)
* A few known test failures are now fixed (see t3421)
* bash-prompt during a rebase --merge is now REBASE-i instead of
REBASE-m. Reason: The prompt is a reflection of the backend in use;
this allows users to report an issue to the git mailing list with
the appropriate backend information, and allows advanced users to
know where to search for relevant control files. (see t9903)
testcase modification notes:
t3406: --interactive and --merge had slightly different progress output
while running; adjust a test to match the new expectation
t3420: these test precise output while running, but rebase--am,
rebase--merge, and rebase--interactive all were built on very
different commands (am, merge-recursive, cherry-pick), so the
tests expected different output for each type. Now we expect
--merge and --interactive to have the same output.
t3421: --interactive fixes some bugs in --merge! Wahoo!
t9903: --merge uses the interactive backend so the prompt expected is
now REBASE-i.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since commit 3f213981e4 ("add tests for rebasing merged history",
2013-06-06), t3425 has had tests which included the rebasing of merged
history and whose order of applied commits was checked. Unfortunately,
the tests expected different behavior depending on which backend was in
use. Implementing these checks was the following four lines (including
the TODO message) which were repeated verbatim three times in t3425:
#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
test_run_rebase success 'e n o' ''
test_run_rebase success 'e n o' -m
test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -i
As part of the effort to reduce differences between the rebase backends
so that users get more uniform behavior, let's define the correct
behavior and modify the different backends so they all get the right
answer. It turns out that the difference in behavior here is entirely
due to topological sorting; since some backends require topological
sorting (particularly when --rebase-merges is specified), require it for
all modes. Modify the am and merge backends to implement this.
Performance Considerations:
I was unable to measure any appreciable performance difference with this
change. Trying to control the run-to-run variation was difficult; I
eventually found a headless beefy box that I could ssh into, which
seemed to help. Using git.git, I ran the following testcase:
$ git reset --hard v2.20.0-rc1~2
$ time git rebase --quiet v2.20.0-rc0~16
I first ran once to warm any disk caches, then ran five subsequent runs
and recorded the times of those five. I observed the following results
for the average time:
Before this change:
"real" timing: 1.340s (standard deviation: 0.040s)
"user" timing: 1.050s (standard deviation: 0.041s)
"sys" timing: 0.270s (standard deviation: 0.011s)
After this change:
"real" timing: 1.327s (standard deviation: 0.065s)
"user" timing: 1.031s (standard deviation: 0.061s)
"sys" timing: 0.280s (standard deviation: 0.014s)
Measurements aside, I would expect the timing for walking revisions to
be dwarfed by the work involved in creating and applying patches, so
this isn't too surprising. Further, while somewhat counter-intuitive,
it is possible that turning on topological sorting is actually a
performance improvement: by way of comparison, turning on --topo-order
made fast-export faster (see
https://public-inbox.org/git/20090211135640.GA19600@coredump.intra.peff.net/).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-legacy-rebase.sh script previously had code of the form:
if git_am_opt:
if interactive:
if incompatible_opts:
show_error_about_interactive_and_am_incompatibilities
if rebase-merge:
if incompatible_opts
show_error_about_merge_and_am_incompatibilities
which was a triply nested if. However, the first conditional
(git_am_opt) and third (incompatible_opts) were somewhat redundant: the
latter condition was a strict subset of the former. Simplify this by
moving the innermost conditional to the outside, allowing us to remove
the test on git_am_opt entirely and giving us the following form:
if incompatible_opts:
if interactive:
show_error_about_interactive_and_am_incompatibilities
if rebase-merge:
show_error_about_merge_and_am_incompatibilities
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While 'quiet' and 'interactive' may sound like antonyms, the interactive
machinery actually has logic that implements several
interactive_rebase=implied cases (--exec, --keep-empty, --rebase-merges)
which won't pop up an editor. The rewrite of interactive rebase in C
added a quiet option, though it only turns stats off. Since we want to
make the interactive machinery also take over for git-rebase--merge, it
should fully implement the --quiet option.
git-rebase--interactive was already somewhat quieter than
git-rebase--merge and git-rebase--am, possibly because cherry-pick has
just traditionally been quieter. As such, we only drop a few
informational messages -- "Rebasing (n/m)" and "Successfully rebased..."
Also, for simplicity, remove the differences in how quiet and verbose
options were recorded. Having one be signalled by the presence of a
"verbose" file in the state_dir, while the other was signalled by the
contents of a "quiet" file was just weirdly inconsistent. (This
inconsistency pre-dated the rewrite into C.) Make them consistent by
having them both key off the presence of the file.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The post-rewrite hook is supposed to be invoked for each rewritten
commit. The fact that a commit was selected and processed by the rebase
operation (even though when we hit an error a user said it had no more
useful changes), suggests we should write an entry for it. In
particular, let's treat it as an empty commit trivially squashed into
its parent.
This brings the rebase--am and rebase--merge backends in sync with the
behavior of the interactive rebase backend.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The post-rewrite hook is documented as being invoked by commands that
rewrite commits such as commit --amend and rebase, and that it will
be called for each rewritten commit.
Apparently, the three backends handled --skip'ed commits differently:
am: treat the skipped commit as though it weren't rewritten
merge: same as 'am' backend
interactive: treat skipped commits as having been rewritten to empty
(view them as an empty fixup to their parent)
For now, just add a testcase documenting the different behavior (use
--keep to force usage of the interactive machinery even though we have
no empty commits). A subsequent commit will remove the inconsistency in
--skip handling.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit f57696802c ("rebase: really just passthru the `git am`
options", 2018-11-14), the handling of `git am` options was simplified
dramatically (and an option parsing bug was fixed), but it introduced
a small regression in the error message shown when options only
understood by separate backends were used:
$ git rebase --keep --ignore-whitespace
fatal: cannot combine interactive options (--interactive, --exec,
--rebase-merges, --preserve-merges, --keep-empty, --root + --onto) with
am options (.git/rebase-apply/applying)
$ git rebase --merge --ignore-whitespace
fatal: cannot combine merge options (--merge, --strategy,
--strategy-option) with am options (.git/rebase-apply/applying)
Note that in both cases, the list of "am options" is
".git/rebase-apply/applying", which makes no sense. Since the lists of
backend-specific options is documented pretty thoroughly in the rebase
man page (in the "Incompatible Options" section, with multiple links
throughout the document), and since I expect this list to change over
time, just simplify the error message.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The conversion of the script version of rebase took messages that were
prefixed with "error:" and passed them along to die(), which adds a
"fatal:" prefix, thus resulting in messages of the form:
fatal: error: cannot combine...
which seems redundant. Remove the "error:" prefix from the builtin
version of rebase, and change the prefix from "error:" to "fatal:" in
the legacy script to match.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A recent update accidentally squelched an error message when the
run_command API failed to run a missing command, which has been
corrected.
* jc/run-command-report-exec-failure-fix:
run-command: report exec failure
"git help -a" did not work well when an overly long alias is
defined, which has been corrected.
* js/help-commands-verbose-by-default-fix:
help -a: handle aliases with long names gracefully
help.h: fix coding style
The new test_oid machinery in the test library requires reading
some information from t/oid-info/hash-info and t/oid-info/oid.
The logic to read from these files in shell uses built-in "read"
command, which leaves CR at the end of these text files when they
are checked out with CRLF line endings, at least when run with bash
shipped with Git for Windows. This results in an unexpected value
in the variable these lines are read into, leading the tests to
fail.
Mark them to be checked out always with the LF line endings.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The oneline notwithstanding, 13374987dd (completion: use _gitcompbuiltin
for format-patch, 2018-11-03) changed also the way send-email options
are completed, by asking the git send-email command itself what options
it offers.
Necessarily, this must fail when built with NO_PERL because send-email
itself is a Perl script. Which means that we need the PERL prerequisite
for the send-email test case in t9902.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test t4256-am-format-flowed.sh requires carefully applying a
patch after ignoring padding whitespace. This breaks if the file
is munged to include CRLF line endings instead of LF.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The compiler reports this because show_gitcomp() never actually
returns a value:
"parse-options.c", line 520: warning: Function has no return
statement : show_gitcomp
We could shut the compiler up. But instead let's not bury exit() too
deep. Do the same as internal -h handling, return a special error code
and handle the exit() in parse_options() (and other
parse_options_step() callers) instead.
Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We take pains to determine the longest command beforehand, so that we
can align the category column after printing the command names.
However, then we re-use that value when printing the aliases. If any
alias name is longer than the longest command name, we consequently try
to add a negative number of spaces (but `mput_char()` does not expect
any negative values and simply decrements until the value is 0, i.e.
it tries to add close to 2**31 spaces).
Let's fix this by adjusting the `longest` variable before printing the
aliases.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1975.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We want a space after the `while` keyword.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 321fd823 ("run-command: mark path lookup errors with ENOENT",
2018-10-24), we rewrote the logic to execute a command by looking
in the directories on $PATH; as a side effect, a request to run a
command that is not found on $PATH is noticed even before a child
process is forked to execute it.
We however stopped to report an exec failure in such a case by
mistake. Add a logic to report the error unless silent-exec-failure
is requested, to match the original code.
Reported-by: John Passaro <john.a.passaro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The text body of section Behavioral Differences is typeset as code,
but should be regular text. Remove the indentation to achieve that.
While here, prettify the language:
- use "the x backend" instead of "x-based rebase";
- use present tense instead of future tense;
and use subsections instead of a list.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have three double-quote characters, which is one too many or too few.
Dropping the last one seems to match the original intention best.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I had to read this sentence a few times to understand it. Let's try to
clarify it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some items that should be in "Performance, Internal Implementation,
Development Support etc." have ended up in "UI, Workflows & Features"
and "Fixes since v2.19". Move them, and do s/uses/use/ while at it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit d8981c3f88 ("format-patch: do not let its diff-options affect
--range-diff", 2018-11-30) taught `show_range_diff()` to accept a
NULL-pointer as an indication that it should use its own "reasonable
default". That fixed a regression from a5170794 ("Merge branch
'ab/range-diff-no-patch'", 2018-11-18), but unfortunately it introduced
a regression of its own.
In particular, it means we forget the `file` member of the diff options,
so rather than placing a range-diff in the cover-letter, we write it to
stdout. In order to fix this, rewrite the two callers adjusted by
d8981c3f88 to instead create a "dummy" set of diff options where they
only fill in the fields we absolutely require, such as output file and
color.
Modify and extend the existing tests to try and verify that the right
contents end up in the right place.
Don't revert `show_range_diff()`, i.e., let it keep accepting NULL.
Rather than removing what is dead code and figuring out it isn't
actually dead and we've broken 2.20, just leave it for now.
[es: retain diff coloring when going to stdout]
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git diff --raw" lost ellipses to adjust the output columns for
some time now, but the documentation still showed them.
* gh/diff-raw-has-no-ellipses:
doc: update diff-format.txt for removed ellipses in --raw
