* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/fastimport:
Update bash completion for git-config options
Teach bash completion about recent log long options
Teach bash completion about 'git remote update'
Update bash completion header documentation
Remove a duplicate --not option in bash completion
Teach bash completion about git-shortlog
Hide the plumbing diff-{files,index,tree} from bash completion
Update bash completion to ignore some more plumbing commands
When check_sha1_signature fails, program is not terminated:
it prints an error message and returns NULL, so the
buffer returned by read_sha1_file should be freed before.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In git.git repository, "git-name-rev v1.3.0~158" cannot name the
rev, while adjacent revs can be named.
This was because it gives up traversal from the tips of existing
refs as soon as it sees a commit that has older commit timestamp
than what is being named. This is usually a good heuristics,
but v1.3.0~158 has a slightly older commit timestamp than
v1.3.0~157 (i.e. it's child), as these two were made in a
separate repostiory (in fact, in a different continent).
This adds a hardcoded slop value (1 day) to the cut-off
heuristics to work this kind of problem around. The current
algorithm essentially runs around from the available tips down
to ancient commits and names every single rev available that are
newer than cut-off date, so a single day slop would not add that
much overhead in repositories with long enough history where the
performance of name-rev matters.
I think the algorithm could be made a bit smarter by deepening
the graph on demand as a new commit is asked to be named (this
would require rewriting of name_rev() function not to recurse
itself but use a traversal list like revision.c traverser does),
but that would be a separate issue.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A few new configuration options grew out of the woodwork during the
1.5.2 series. Most of these are pretty easy to support a completion
of, so we do so.
I wanted to also add completion support for the <driver> part of
merge.<driver>.name but to do that we have to look at all of the
.gitattributes files and guess what the unique set of <driver>
strings would be. Since this appears to be non-trivial I'm punting
on it at this time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
(Somewhat) recently git-log learned about --reverse (to show commits
in the opposite order) and a looong time ago I think it learned
about --raw (to show the raw diff, rather than a unified diff).
These are both useful options, so we should make them easy for the
user to complete.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Recently the git-remote command grew an update subcommand, which
can be used to execute git-fetch across multiple repositories
in a single step. These can be configured with the 'remotes.*'
configuration options, so we can offer completion for any name that
matches and appears to be useful to git-remote update.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
1) Added a note about supporting the long options for most commands,
as we have been doing so for quite some time.
2) Include a notice that these routines are covered by the GPL,
as that may not be obvious, even though they are distributed
as part of the core Git distribution.
3) Added a short section on how to send patches to the routines,
and to whom they should get sent to. Currently that is me,
as I am the active maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This was just me being silly; I put the --not option into the
completion list twice. There's no duplicates shown in the shell
as the shell removes them before showing them to the user. But we
really don't need the duplicates in the source script either.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We've had completion for git-log for quite some time, but just
today I noticed we don't have it for the new builtin shortlog
that runs git-log internally. This is indeed a handy thing to
have completion for, especially when your branch names are of
the Very-Very-Long-and-Hard/To-Type/Variety/That-Some-Use.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The diff-* programs are meant to be plumbing for the diff frontend;
most end users aren't invoking these commands directly. Consequently
we should avoid showing them as possible completions.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When e8438420bb allowed us to reload
the marks table on subsequent runs of fast-import we really broke
things, as we set pack_id to MAX_PACK_ID for any objects we imported
into the marks table. Creating a branch from that mark should fail
as we attempt to read the object through a non-existant packed_git
pointer. Instead we have to use the normal Git object system to
locate the older commit, as we ourselves do not have a reference
to the packed_git it resides in.
This bug only occurred because t9300 was not complete enough.
When we added the --import-marks feature we didn't actually test
its implementation enough to verify the function worked as intended.
I have corrected that, and included the changes as part of this fix.
Prior versions of fast-import fail the new test(s); this commit
allows them to pass.
Credit for this bug find goes to Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de> as
he recently identified a similiar bug in the tree lazy-loading path.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To resolve a corner case uncovered by Simon Hausmann I need to
reuse the logic for the SHA-1 expression version of the 'from '
command within the mark version of the 'from ' command. This change
doesn't alter any functionality, but is merely breaking the common
code out to a function that I can reuse.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Commit a5c1780a03 sets the pack_id of existing
objects to MAX_PACK_ID. When the same object is referenced later again it is
found in the local object hash. With such a pack_id fast-import should not try
to locate that object in the newly created pack(s).
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Fix uninitialized last_object->no_free variable that is accessed in
store_object.
Signed-off-by: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This works in repositories that have their refs packed by
"git-pack-refs --all --prune" whereas testing the file
$git_dir/refs/heads/$opt_o does not.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch documents the branch.autosetupmerge config option, added
by commit 0746d19a.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When the per-method enable logic disables the access, we should
not even look at the global one.
git-cvsserver.perl | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-add reads this variable, and honours the contents of that file if that
exists. Match this behaviour in git-status, too.
Noticed by Evan Carroll on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We do not appreciate C99 initializers, declarations after statements,
or "0" instead of "NULL".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Note: since the consequence of failure is to call die,
I don't bother to close "f".
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
[sp: Modified Jonas' original patch to keep checkout-index
as a a valid completion.]
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* maint-1.5.1:
annotate: make it work from subdirectories.
git-config: Correct asciidoc documentation for --int/--bool
t1300: Add tests for git-config --bool --get
unpack-trees.c: verify_uptodate: remove dead code
Use PATH_MAX instead of TEMPFILE_PATH_LEN
branch: fix segfault when resolving an invalid HEAD
The asciidoc documentation seemed to indicate that type specifiers
are honoured on writing operations which they aren't. Make this
more clear.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Noticed that there were only tests for --int, but not
for --bool. Add some.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Caused by return value of resolve_ref being passed directly
to xstrdup whereby the sanity checking was never reached.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I didn't have a chance to test the off-by-default minimize-url
stuff enough before, but it's quite broken for people passing
the --trunk/-T, --tags/-t, --branches/-b switches to "init" or
"clone" commands.
Additionally, follow-parent functionality seems broken when we're
not connected to the root of the repository.
Default behavior for "traditional" git-svn users who only track
one directory (without needing follow-parent) should be
reasonable, as those users started using things before
minimize-url functionality existed.
Behavior for users more used to the git-svnimport-like command
line will also benefit from a more-flexible command-line than
svnimport given the assumption they're working with
non-restrictive read permissions on the repository.
I hope to properly fix these bugs when I get a chance to in the
next week or so, but I would like to get this stopgap measure of
reverting to the old behavior as soon as possible.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When sorting directory names by depth (slash ("/") count) and
closing the deepest directories first (as the protocol
requires), we failed to put the root baton (with an empty string
as its key "") after top-level directories (which did not have
any slashes).
This resulted in svnserve being in a situation it couldn't
handle and caused a segmentation fault on the remote server.
This bug did not affect users of DAV and filesystem repositories.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Confirmed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The todo list at the end of the user manual says that something must be
said about .gitignore. Also, there seems to be a lack of documentation
on how to choose between the various types of ignore files (.gitignore
vs. .git/info/exclude, etc.).
This patch adds a section on ignoring files which try to introduce how
to tell git about ignored files, and how the different strategies
complement eachother.
The syntax of exclude patterns is explained in a simplified manner, with
a reference to git-ls-files(1) which already contains a more thorough
explanation.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Another amusing git exploration example brought up in irc. (Credit to
aeruder for the complete solution.)
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
I don't really want to look like we're encouraging the shared repository
thing. Take down some of the argument for using purely
single-developer-owned repositories and collaborating using patches and
pulls instead.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The embarassing history of this tutorial is that I started it without
really understanding the index well, so I avoided mentioning it.
And we all got the idea that "index" was a word to avoid using around
newbies, but it was reluctantly mentioned that *something* had to be
said. The result is a little awkward: the discussion of the index never
actually uses that word, and isn't well-integrated into the surrounding
material.
Let's just go ahead and use the word "index" from the very start, and
try to demonstrate its use with a minimum of lecturing.
Also, remove discussion of using git-commit with explicit filenames.
We're already a bit slow here to get people to their first commit, and
I'm not convinced this is really so important.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Mention the user manual, especially as an alternative introduction for
user's mainly interested in read-only operations.
And fix a typo while we're there.
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
