Since commit f269048 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs,
2013-05-11) we update tracking refs opportunistically when fetching
remote branches. However, if there is a configured non-pattern refspec
that does not match any of the refspecs given on the command line then a
fatal error occurs.
Fix this by setting the "missing_ok" flag when calling get_fetch_map.
Test-added-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we run a regular "git fetch" without arguments, we
update the tracking refs according to the configured
refspec. However, when we run "git fetch origin master" (or
"git pull origin master"), we do not look at the configured
refspecs at all, and just update FETCH_HEAD.
We miss an opportunity to update "refs/remotes/origin/master"
(or whatever the user has configured). Some users find this
confusing, because they would want to do further comparisons
against the old state of the remote master, like:
$ git pull origin master
$ git log HEAD...origin/master
In the currnet code, they are comparing against whatever
commit happened to be in origin/master from the last time
they did a complete "git fetch". This patch will update a
ref from the RHS of a configured refspec whenever we happen
to be fetching its LHS. That makes the case above work.
The downside is that any users who really care about whether
and when their tracking branches are updated may be
surprised.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Each "struct ref" has a boolean flag that is set by the
fetch code to determine whether the ref should be marked as
"not-for-merge" or not when we write it out to FETCH_HEAD.
It would be useful to turn this boolean into a tri-state,
with the third state meaning "do not bother writing it out
to FETCH_HEAD at all". That would let us add extra refs to
the set of refs to be stored (e.g., to store copies of
things we fetched) without impacting FETCH_HEAD.
This patch turns it into an enum that covers the tri-state
case, and hopefully makes the code more explicit and easier
to read.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation erroneously used the same wording for both fetch and
pull, stating that something will be merged even in git-fetch(1).
In addition, saying that "<ref> is equivalent to <ref>:" doesn't
really help anyone who still needs to read manpages. Clarify what is
actually going on.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have three sequential tests for for whether tracking refs
are updated by various fetches and pulls; the first two
should not update the ref, and the third should. Each test
depends on the state left by the test before.
This is fragile (a failing early test will confuse later
tests), and means we cannot add more "should update" tests
after the third one.
Let's instead save the initial state before these tests, and
then reset to a known state before running each test.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Git 1.8.2.3
t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive
t5004: ignore pax global header file
mergetools/kdiff3: do not use --auto when diffing
transport-helper: trivial style cleanup
Fix "git cherry-pick $annotated_tag", which was mistakenly rejected.
* mv/sequencer-pick-error-diag:
cherry-pick: picking a tag that resolves to a commit is OK
Earlier, 21246dbb9e (cherry-pick: make sure all input objects are
commits, 2013-04-11) tried to catch an unlikely "git cherry-pick $blob"
as an error, but broke a more important use case to cherry-pick a
tag that points at a commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test 2 of t5004 checks if a supposedly empty tar archive really
contains no files. 24676f02 (t5004: fix issue with empty archive test
and bsdtar) removed our commit hash to make it work with bsdtar, but
the test still fails on NetBSD and OpenBSD, which use their own tar
that considers a tar file containing only NULs as broken.
Here's what the different archivers do when asked to create a tar
file without entries:
$ uname -v
NetBSD 6.0.1 (GENERIC)
$ gtar --version | head -1
tar (GNU tar) 1.26
$ bsdtar --version
bsdtar 2.8.4 - libarchive 2.8.4
$ : >zero.tar
$ perl -e 'print "\0" x 10240' >tenk.tar
$ sha1 zero.tar tenk.tar
SHA1 (zero.tar) = da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
SHA1 (tenk.tar) = 34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | tar cf - -T - | sha1
da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
$ : | gtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
$ : | bsdtar cf - -T - | sha1
34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
So NetBSD's native tar creates an empty file, while GNU tar and bsdtar
both give us 10KB of NULs -- just like git archive with an empty tree.
Now let's see how the archivers handle these two kinds of empty tar
files:
$ tar tf zero.tar; echo $?
tar: Unexpected EOF on archive file
1
$ gtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
gtar: This does not look like a tar archive
gtar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
2
$ bsdtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
0
$ tar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
tar: Cannot identify format. Searching...
tar: End of archive volume 1 reached
tar: Sorry, unable to determine archive format.
1
$ gtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
$ bsdtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
0
NetBSD's tar complains about both, bsdtar happily accepts any of them
and GNU tar doesn't like zero-length archive files. So the safest
course of action is to stay with our block-of-NULs format which is
compatible with GNU tar and bsdtar, as we can't make NetBSD's native
tar happy anyway.
We can simplify our test, however, by taking tar out of the picture.
Instead of extracting the archive and checking for the non-presence of
files, check if the file has a size of 10KB and contains only NULs.
This makes t5004 pass on NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Versions of tar that don't know pax headers -- like the ones in NetBSD 6
and OpenBSD 5.2 -- extract them as regular files. Explicitly ignore the
file created for our global header when checking the list of extracted
files, as this is normal and harmless fall-back behaviour. This fixes
test 3 of t5004 on these platforms.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `kdiff3 --auto` help message is, "No GUI if all conflicts are auto-
solvable." This flag was carried over from the original mergetool
commands. diff_cmd() is for two-way comparisons only so remove the
superfluous flag.
Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comment was copied from hg-fast-export, not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's possible that the previous tip goes away, we should not assume it's
always present. Fortunately we are only using it to calculate the
progress to display to the user, so only that needs to be fixed.
Also, add a test that triggers this issue.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Translate 44 new messages came from git.pot update in
c6bc7d4 (l10n: git.pot: v1.8.3 round 2 (44 new, 12 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
git-merge-tree causes a null pointer dereference when a directory
entry exists in only one or two of the three trees being compared with
no corresponding entry in the other tree(s).
When this happens, we want to handle the entry as a directory and not
attempt to mark it as a file merge. Do this by setting the entries bit
in the directory mask when the entry is missing or when it is a
directory, only performing the file comparison when we know that a file
entry exists.
Reported-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Tested-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* fc/remote-bzr:
remote-bzr: avoid bad refs
remote-bzr: convert all unicode keys to str
remote-bzr: access branches only when needed
remote-bzr: delay peer branch usage
remote-bzr: iterate revisions properly
remote-bzr: improve progress reporting
remote-bzr: add option to specify branches
remote-bzr: add custom method to find branches
remote-bzr: improve author sanitazion
remote-bzr: add support for shared repo
remote-bzr: fix branch names
remote-bzr: add support for bzr repos
remote-bzr: use branch variable when appropriate
remote-bzr: fix partially pushed merge
remote-bzr: fixes for branch diverge
remote-bzr: add support to push merges
remote-bzr: always try to update the worktree
remote-bzr: fix order of locking in CustomTree
remote-bzr: delay blob fetching until the very end
remote-bzr: cleanup CustomTree
Versions of fast-export before v1.8.2 throws a bad 'reset' commands
because of a behavior in transport-helper that is not even needed.
We should ignore them, otherwise we will treat them as branches and
fail.
This was fixed in v1.8.2, but some people use this script in older
versions of git.
Also, check if the ref was a tag, and skip it for now.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise some versions of bazaar might barf.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there's already a remote-helper tracking ref, we can fetch the
SHA-1 to report proper push messages (as opposed to always reporting
[new branch]).
The remote-helper currently can specify the old SHA-1 to avoid this
problem, but there's no point in forcing all remote-helpers to be aware
of git commit ids; they should be able to be agnostic of them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
zsh is smart enough to add the right suffix while completing, there's no
point in trying to do the same as bash.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-C takes a commit object, not a file.
Signed-off-by: Anders Granskogen Bjørnstad <andersgb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rs/pp-user-info-without-extra-allocation:
pretty: remove intermediate strbufs from pp_user_info()
pretty: simplify output line length calculation in pp_user_info()
pretty: simplify input line length calculation in pp_user_info()
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
Bazaar doesn't seem to be tested for multiple usage of branches, so
resources seem to be leaked all over. Let's try to minimize this by
accessing the Branch objects only when needed.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way we don't need to store the list of all the revisions, which
doesn't seem to be very memory efficient with bazaar's design, for
whatever reason.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
No need to manually count the revisions, and also, this would help to
iterate more properly.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We might not want all the branches. And branch handling in bazaar is
rather tricky, so it's safer to simply specify them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The official method is incredibly inefficient and slow.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
So that we don't end up with '<None>', and also synchronize it with the
one from remote-hg.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way all the remotes share the same data, so adding multiple
remotes, or renaming them doesn't create extra overhead.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
