* lt/rev-list:
setup_revisions(): handle -n<n> and -<n> internally.
git-log (internal): more options.
git-log (internal): add approxidate.
Rip out merge-order and make "git log <paths>..." work again.
Tie it all together: "git log"
Introduce trivial new pager.c helper infrastructure
git-rev-list libification: rev-list walking
Splitting rev-list into revisions lib, end of beginning.
rev-list split: minimum fixup.
First cut at libifying revlist generation
A brief survey of useful git tools, including third-party
and external projects.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-cvsserver now knows how to do the pserver auth chat when the user
is anonymous. To get it to work, add a line to your inetd.conf like
cvspserver stream tcp nowait nobody git-cvsserver pserver
(On some inetd implementations you may have to put the pserver parameter twice.)
Commits are blocked. Naively, git-cvsserver assumes non-malicious users. Please
review the code before setting this up on an internet-accessible server.
NOTE: the <nobody> user above will need write access to the .git directory
to maintain the sqlite database. Updating of the sqlite database should be
put in an update hook to avoid this problem, so that it is maintained by
users with write access.
We now have different error messages when the repo is not found vs repo is
not configured to allow gitcvs. Should help users during initial checkouts.
Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To create nested directories without (or before) sending file entries
is rather tricky. Most clients just work. Eclipse, however, expects
a very specific sequence of events. With this patch, cvsserver meets
those expectations.
Note: we may want to reuse prepdir() in req_update -- should move it
outside of req_co. Right now prepdir() is tied to how req_co() works.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fixes two bugs introduced when we switched to generic tree
traversal code.
(1) directory mode recorded silently became 0755, not 0777
(2) if passed a tree object (not a commit), it emitted an
alarming error message (but proceeded anyway).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
C programmers are well used to counting from zero, but every
other text file tool starts counting from 1.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I thought passing --stop-on-copy to svn would save us from all
the trouble svn-arch-mirror had with directory (project) copies.
I was wrong, there was one thing I overlooked.
If a tree was moved from /foo/trunk to /bar/foo/trunk with no
other changes in r10, but the last change was done in r5, the
Last Changed Rev (from svn info) in /bar/foo/trunk will still be
r5, even though the copy in the repository didn't exist until
r10.
Now, if we ever detect that the Last Changed Rev isn't what
we're expecting, we'll run svn diff and only croak if there are
differences between them.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When inspecting contents of topic branches for yet-to-be-merged
commits, a commit that is in the release/master branch is
uninteresting. Previous round still showed them, especially,
the ones before a topic branch that was forked from the
release/master later than other topic branches.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-mv needs to be run from the base directory so that
the check if a file is under revision also covers files
outside of a subdirectory. Previously, e.g. in the git repo,
cd Documentation; git-mv ../README .
produced the error
Error: '../README' not under version control
The test is extended for this case; it previously only tested
one direction.
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
--no-signed-off-cc is still supported, for backwards compatibility
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I ended up using GIT_SVN_ID far more than I ever thought I
would. Typing less is good.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If it does change, we're screwed anyways as SVN will refuse to
commit or update. We also never access more than one SVN
repository per-invocation, so we can store it as a global, too.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In a new repository, the initial fetch creates a master branch
if one does not exist so HEAD has something to point to.
It now creates a master at the end of the initial fetch run,
pointing to the latest revision. Previously it pointed to the
first revision imported, which is generally less useful.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Syntax is compatible with git-svnimport and git-cvsimport:
normalperson = Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
If this option is specified and git-svn encounters an SVN
committer name that it cannot parse, it git-svn will abort.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We regenerate and use git-svn-id: whenever we fetch or otherwise
commit to remotes/git-svn. We don't actually know what revision
number we'll commit to SVN at commit time, so this is useless.
It won't throw off things like 'rebuild', though, which knows to
only use the last instance of git-svn-id: in a log message
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Fixed manually-edited commit messages not going to
remotes/git-svn on sequential commits after the sequential
commit optimization.
* format help correctly after adding 'show-ignore'
* sha1_short regexp matches down to 4 hex characters
(from git-rev-parse --short documentation)
* Print the first line of the commit message when we commit to
SVN next to the sha1.
* Document 'T' (type change) in the comments
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I've said I don't like branches in Subversion, and I still don't.
This is a bit more flexible, though, as the argument for -b is any
arbitrary git head/tag reference.
This makes some things easier:
* Importing git history into a brand new SVN branch.
* Tracking multiple SVN branches via GIT_SVN_ID, even from multiple
repositories.
* Adding tags from SVN (still need to use GIT_SVN_ID, though).
* Even merge tracking is supported, if and only the heads end up with
100% equivalent tree objects. This is more stricter but more robust
and foolproof than parsing commit messages, imho.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If git-update-index --index-info -z is used only the first
record given to the process will actually be updated as
the -z option is ignored until after all index records
have been read and processed. This meant that multiple
null terminated records were seen as a single record which
was lacking a trailing LF, however since the first record
ended in a null the C string handling functions ignored the
trailing garbage. So --index-info should be required to be
the last command line option, much as --stdin is required
to be the last command line option. Because --index-info
implies --stdin this isn't an issue as the user shouldn't
be passing --stdin when also passing --index-info.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Found with:
for i in *.txt; do
grep -A 2 "SYNOPSIS" "$i" | grep -q "^\[verse\]$" && continue
multiline=$(grep -A 3 "SYNOPSIS" "$i" | tail -n 1)
test -n "$multiline" && echo "$i: $multiline"
done
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In our last update to use the encoding while showing the commit
diff we added a new argument to this function. But we missed
updating all the callers.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some versions of sed lack the "-i" option.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If we decide to use refs/remotes/, having a convenient way to
list them would be nice.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A recent Eclipse compat fix broke checkouts with -d. Fix it so that the server
sends the correct module name instead of the destination directory name.
Just by sending the files in an ordered fashion, clients can process them
much faster. And we can optimize our check of whether we created this
directory already -- faster.
Timings for a checkout on a commandline cvs client for a project with
~13K files totalling ~100MB:
Unsorted:
603.12 real 16.89 user 42.88 sys
Sorted:
298.19 real 26.37 user 42.42 sys
The "similarity" logic was giving added material way too much
negative weight. What we wanted to see was how similar the
post-change image was compared to the pre-change image, so the
natural definition of similarity is how much common things are
there, relative to the post-change image's size.
This simplifies things a lot.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
An earlier commit 8098a178b2
accidentally lost race protection from git-commit command.
This commit reinstates it. When something else updates HEAD
pointer while you were editing your commit message, the command
would notice and abort the commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The new flag is used to amend the tip of the current branch. Prepare
the tree object you would want to replace the latest commit as usual
(this includes the usual -i/-o and explicit paths), and the commit log
editor is seeded with the commit message from the tip of the current
branch. The commit you create replaces the current tip -- if it was a
merge, it will have the parents of the current tip as parents -- so the
current top commit is discarded.
It is a rough equivalent for:
$ git reset --soft HEAD^
$ ... do something else to come up with the right tree ...
$ git commit -c ORIG_HEAD
but can be used to amend a merge commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds a new flag, --topics, to help managing topic
branches. When you have topic branches forked some time ago
from your primary line of development, show-branch would show
many "uninteresting" things that happend on the primary line of
development when trying to see what are still not merged from
the topic branches.
With this flag, the first ref given to show-branch is taken as
the primary branch, and the rest are taken as the topic
branches. Output from the command is modified so that commits
only on the primary branch are not shown. In other words,
$ git show-branch --topics master topic1 topic2 ...
shows an (almost) equivalent of
$ git rev-list ^master topic1 topic2 ...
The major differences are that (1) you can tell which commits
are on which branch, and (2) the commit at the fork point is
shown.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now this is really a corner case, but if you have the git source
tree from somewhere other than the official tarball, you do not
have version file. And if git-describe does not work for you
(maybe you do not have git yet), we spilled an error message
from "cat version".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This moves the handling of max-count shorthand from the internal
implementation of "git log" to setup_revisions() so other users
of setup_revisions() can use it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Here is an updated version of git-blame. The main changes compared to
the first version are:
* Use the new revision.h interface to do the revision walking
* Do the right thing in a lot of more cases than before. In particular
parallel development tracks are hopefully handled sanely.
* Lots of clean-up
It still won't follow file renames though.
There are still some differences in the output between git-blame and
git-annotate. For example, in 'Makefile' git-blame assigns lines
354-358 to 455a7f3275 and git-annotate
assigns the same lines to 79a9d8ea0d.
I think git-blame is correct in this case. This patterns occur in
several other places, git-annotate seems to sometimes assign lines to
merge commits when the lines actually changed in some other commit
which precedes the merge.
[jc: I have conned Ryan into doing test cases, so that it would
help development and fixes on both implementations. Let the
battle begin! ;-) ]
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now blame will depend on the new revision walker infrastructure,
we need to make it depend on earlier parts of Linus' rev-list
topic branch, hence this merge.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We were missing the --whitespace option in the usage string for
git-apply and git-am, so this commit adds them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After reading a lengthy discussion on the list, I've come to the
conclusion that creating a 'remotes' directory in refs isn't
such a bad idea.
You can still branch from it by specifying remotes/git-svn (not
needing the leading 'refs/'), and the documentation has been
updated to reflect that.
The 'git-svn' part of the ref can of course be set to whatever
you want by using the GIT_SVN_ID environment variable, as
before.
I'm using refs/remotes/git-svn, and not going with something
like refs/remotes/git-svn/HEAD as it's redundant for Subversion
where there's zero distinction between branches and directories.
Run git-svn rebuild --upgrade to upgrade your repository to use
the new head. git-svn-HEAD must be manually deleted for safety
reasons.
Side note: if you ever (and I hope you never) want to run
git-update-refs on a 'remotes/' ref, make sure you have the
'refs/' prefix as you don't want to be clobbering your
'remotes/' in $GIT_DIR (where remote URLs are stored).
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When both heads deleted, or our side deleted while the other
side did not touch, we did not have to update the working tree.
However, we forgot to remove existing working tree file when we
did not touch and the other side did.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
