Whenever we create a commit object via lookup_commit, we
give it a unique index to be used with the commit-slab API.
The theory is that any "struct commit" we create would
follow this code path, so any such struct would get an
index. However, callers could use alloc_commit_node()
directly (and get multiple commits with index 0).
Let's push the indexing into alloc_commit_node so that it's
hard for callers to get it wrong.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 2c1cbec (Use proper object allocators for unknown
object nodes too, 2007-04-16), added a special "any_object"
allocator, it never taught alloc_report to report on it. To
do so we need to add an extra type argument to the REPORT
macro, as that commit did for DEFINE_ALLOCATOR.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is not a good idea to strbuf_attach an arbitrary pointer
just because a function you are calling wants a strbuf.
Attaching implies a transfer of memory ownership; if anyone
were to modify or release the resulting strbuf, we would
free() the pointer, leading to possible problems:
1. Other users of the original pointer might access freed
memory.
2. The pointer might not be the start of a malloc'd
area, so calling free() on it in the first place would
be wrong.
In the two cases modified here, we are fortunate that nobody
touches the strbuf once it is attached, but it is an
accident waiting to happen. Since the previous commit,
commit_tree and friends take a pointer/buf pair, so we can
just do away with the strbufs entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While strbufs are pretty common throughout our code, it is
more flexible for functions to take a pointer/len pair than
a strbuf. It's easy to turn a strbuf into such a pair (by
dereferencing its members), but less easy to go the other
way (you can strbuf_attach, but that has implications about
memory ownership).
This patch teaches commit_tree (and its associated callers
and sub-functions) to take such a pair for the commit
message rather than a strbuf. This makes passing the buffer
around slightly more verbose, but means we can get rid of
some dangerous strbuf_attach calls in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is expected to be the final maintenance release for 1.9 series,
merging the remaining fixes that are relevant and are already in 2.0.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These were originally removed by 0232852 (t5537: move
http tests out to t5539, 2014-02-13). However, they were
accidentally re-added in 1ddb4d7 (Merge branch
'nd/upload-pack-shallow', 2014-03-21).
This looks like an error in manual conflict resolution.
Here's what happened:
1. v1.9.0 shipped with the http tests in t5537.
2. We realized that this caused problems, and built
0232852 on top to move the tests to their own file.
This fix made it into v1.9.1.
3. We later had another fix in nd/upload-pack-shallow that
also touched t5537. It was built directly on v1.9.0.
When we merged nd/upload-pack-shallow to master, we got a
conflict; it was built on a version with the http tests, but
we had since removed them. The correct resolution was to
drop the http tests and keep the new ones, but instead we
kept everything.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mw/symlinks:
setup: fix windows path buffer over-stepping
setup: don't dereference in-tree symlinks for absolute paths
setup: add abspath_part_inside_repo() function
t0060: add tests for prefix_path when path begins with work tree
t0060: add test for prefix_path when path == work tree
t0060: add test for prefix_path on symlinks via absolute paths
t3004: add test for ls-files on symlinks via absolute paths
Instead of showing a warning and working as before, fail and show
the message and force immediate upgrade from their upstream
repositories when these tools are run, per request from their
primary author.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tools are now maintained out-of-tree, and they have a regression
in v2.0. It's better to start warning the users as soon as possible.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit d508e4a8e2,
reversing changes made to e42552135a.
The author of the original topic says he broke the upcoming 2.0
release with something that relates to "synchronization crash
regression" while refusing to give further specifics, so this would
unfortunately be the safest option for the upcoming release.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not all shells subject the prompt string to parameter expansion. Test
whether the shell will expand the value of PS1, and use the result to
control whether raw ref names are included directly in PS1.
This fixes a regression introduced in commit 8976500 ("git-prompt.sh:
don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1"): zsh does not expand PS1
by default, but that commit assumed it did. The bug resulted in
prompts containing the literal string '${__git_ps1_branch_name}'
instead of the actual branch name.
Reported-by: Caleb Thompson <caleb@calebthompson.io>
Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The highlighting was pretty, but unfortunately, the failure mode
when source-highlight is not installed was that the entire code
block disappears.
See https://bugs.debian.org/745591,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316810.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since git 2.0.0 starting git gui in a submodule using a gitfile fails with
the following error:
No working directory ../../../<path>
couldn't change working directory
to "../../../<path>": no such file or
directory
This is because "git rev-parse --show-toplevel" is only run when git gui
sees a git version of at least 1.7.0 (which is the version in which the
--show-toplevel option was introduced). But "package vsatisfies" returns
false when the major version changes, which is not what we want here.
Fix that for both places where the git version is checked using vsatisfies
by appending a '-' to the version number. This tells vsatisfies that a
change of the major version is not considered to be a problem, as long as
the new major version is larger. This is done for both the place that
caused the reported bug and another spot where the git version is tested
for another feature.
Reported-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@free.fr>
Helped-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Tested-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Older versions of Git before v1.7.10 did not DWIM
$ git pull $URL for-linus
to the tag "tags/for-linus" and the users were required to say
$ git pull $URL tags/for-linus
instead. Because newer versions of Git works either way,
request-pull used to show tags/for-linus when asked
$ git request-pull origin/master $URL for-linus
The recent updates broke this and in the output we see "for-linus"
without the "tags/" prefix.
As v1.7.10 is more than 2 years old, this should matter very little
in practice, but resurrecting it is very simple.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise it might collide with a function of the same name in the
user's environment.
Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The third maintenance release for Git 1.9; contains all the fixes
that are scheduled to appear in Git 2.0 since 1.9.2.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-shell(1) manpage says
EXAMPLE
To disable interactive logins, displaying a greeting
instead:
+
$ chsh -s /usr/bin/git-shell
$ mkdir $HOME/git-shell-commands
[...]
The stray "+" has been there ever since the example was added in
v1.8.3-rc0~210^2 (shell: new no-interactive-login command to print a
custom message, 2013-03-09). The "+" sign between paragraphs is
needed in asciidoc to attach extra paragraphs to a list item but here
it is not needed and ends up rendered as a literal "+". Remove it.
A quick search with "grep -e '<p>+' /usr/share/doc/git/html/*.html"
doesn't find any other instances of this problem.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git p4" dealing with changes in binary files were broken by a
change in 1.9 release.
* cl/p4-use-diff-tree:
git-p4: format-patch to diff-tree change breaks binary patches
The shell prompt script (in contrib/), when using the PROMPT_COMMAND
interface, used an unsafe construct when showing the branch name in
$PS1.
* rh/prompt-pcmode-avoid-eval-on-refname:
git-prompt.sh: don't put unsanitized branch names in $PS1
"git rebase" used a POSIX shell construct FreeBSD /bin/sh does not
work well with.
* km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase:
Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
Some more Unicode codepoints defined in Unicode 6.3 as having zero
width have been taught to our display column counting logic.
* tb/unicode-6.3-zero-width:
utf8.c: partially update to version 6.3
Describe one last minute one-liner fix for regression introduced in
1.9, and fix a grave mischaracterization on a recent remote-hg/bzr
change, pointed out by Felipe.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fixes a regression in 1.9.0 with an obviously correct single-liner.
* cl/p4-use-diff-tree:
git-p4: format-patch to diff-tree change breaks binary patches
When applying binary patches a full index is required. format-patch
already handles this, but diff-tree needs '--full-index' argument
to always output full index. When git-p4 runs git-apply to test
the patch, git-apply rejects the patch due to abbreviated blob
object names. This is the error message git-apply emits in this
case:
error: cannot apply binary patch to '<filename>' without full index line
error: <filename>: patch does not apply
Signed-off-by: Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
