After b489b9d9aa (branch: use branch_checked_out() when deleting refs,
2022-06-14), we no longer look at our local "worktrees" variable, since
branch_checked_out() handles it under the hood. The compiler didn't
notice the unused variable because we call functions to initialize and
free it (so it's not totally unused, it just doesn't do anything
useful).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 12d47e3b1f (fetch: use new branch_checked_out() and add tests,
2022-06-14), fetch's update_local_ref() function stopped using its
"worktrees" parameter. It doesn't need it, since the
branch_checked_out() function examines the global worktrees under the
hood.
So we can not only drop the unused parameter from that function, but
also from its entire call chain. And as we do so all the way up to
do_fetch(), we can see that nobody uses it at all, and we can drop the
local variable there entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The branch_checked_out() method populates a strmap linking a refname to
a worktree that has that branch checked out. While unlikely, it is
possible that a bug or filesystem manipulation could create a scenario
where the same ref is checked out in multiple places. Further, there are
some states in an interactive rebase where HEAD and REBASE_HEAD point to
the same ref, leading to multiple insertions into the strmap. In either
case, the strmap_put() method returns the old value which is leaked.
Update branch_checked_out() to consume that pointer and free it.
Add a test in t2407 that checks this erroneous case. The test "checks
itself" by first confirming that the filesystem manipulations it makes
trigger the branch_checked_out() logic, and then sets up similar
manipulations to make it look like there are multiple worktrees pointing
to the same ref.
While TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK would be helpful to demonstrate the
leakage and prevent it in the future, t2407 uses helpers such as 'git
clone' that cause the test to fail under that mode.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is the last current use of find_shared_symref() that can easily be
replaced by branch_checked_out(). The benefit of this switch is that the
code is a bit simpler, but also it is faster on repeated calls.
The remaining uses of find_shared_symref() are non-trivial to remove, so
we probably should not continue in that direction:
* builtin/notes.c uses find_shared_symref() with "NOTES_MERGE_REF"
instead of "HEAD", so it doesn't have an immediate analogue with
branch_checked_out(). Perhaps we should consider extending it to
include that symref in addition to HEAD, BISECT_HEAD, and
REBASE_HEAD.
* receive-pack.c checks to see if a worktree has a checkout for the ref
that is being updated. The tricky part is that it can actually decide
to update the worktree directly instead of just skipping the update.
This all depends on the receive.denyCurrentBranch config option. The
implementation currenty cares about receiving the worktree in the
result, so the current branch_checked_out() prototype is insufficient
currently. This is something to investigate later, though, since a
large number of refs could be updated at the same time and using the
strmap implementation of branch_checked_out() could be beneficial.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When fetching refs from a remote, it is possible that the refspec will
cause use to overwrite a ref that is checked out in a worktree. The
existing logic in builtin/fetch.c uses a possibly-slow mechanism. Update
those sections to use the new, more efficient branch_checked_out()
helper.
These uses were not previously tested, so add a test case that can be
used for these kinds of collisions. There is only one test now, but more
tests will be added as other consumers of branch_checked_out() are
added.
Note that there are two uses in builtin/fetch.c, but only one of the
messages is tested. This is because the tested check is run before
completing the fetch, and the untested check is not reachable without
concurrent updates to the filesystem. Thus, it is beneficial to keep
that extra check for the sake of defense-in-depth. However, we should
not attempt to test the check, as the effort required is too
complicated to be worth the effort. This use in update_local_ref()
also requires a change in the error message because we no longer have
access to the worktree struct, only the path of the worktree. This error
is so rare that making a distinction between the two is not critical.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The branch_checked_out() helper was added by the previous change, but it
used an over-simplified view to check if a branch is checked out. It
only focused on the HEAD symref, but ignored whether a bisect or rebase
was happening.
Teach branch_checked_out() to check for these things, and also add tests
to ensure that we do not lose this functionality in the future.
Now that this test coverage exists, we can safely refactor
validate_new_branchname() to use branch_checked_out().
Note that we need to prepend "refs/heads/" to the 'state.branch' after
calling wt_status_check_*(). We also need to duplicate wt->path so the
value is not freed at the end of the call.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The validate_new_branchname() method contains a check to see if a branch
is checked out in any non-bare worktree. This is intended to prevent a
force push that will mess up an existing checkout. This helper is not
suitable to performing just that check, because the method will die()
when the branch is checked out instead of returning an error code.
Create a new branch_checked_out() helper that performs the most basic
form of this check. To ensure we can call branch_checked_out() in a loop
with good performance, do a single preparation step that iterates over
all worktrees and stores their current HEAD branches in a strmap. The
branch_checked_out() helper can then discover these branches using a
hash lookup.
This helper is currently missing some key functionality. Namely: it
doesn't look for active rebases or bisects which mean that the branch is
"checked out" even though HEAD doesn't point to that ref. This
functionality will be added in a coming change.
We could use branch_checked_out() in validate_new_branchname(), but this
missing functionality would be a regression. However, we have no tests
that cover this case!
Add a new test script that will be expanded with these cross-worktree
ref updates. The current tests would still pass if we refactored
validate_new_branchname() to use this version of branch_checked_out().
The next change will fix that functionality and add the proper test
coverage.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The way "git fetch" without "--update-head-ok" ensures that HEAD in
no worktree points at any ref being updated was too wasteful, which
has been optimized a bit.
* os/fetch-check-not-current-branch:
fetch: limit shared symref check only for local branches
Documentation update.
* pb/ggg-in-mfc-doc:
MyFirstContribution: drop PR description for GGG single-patch contributions
MyFirstContribution: reference "The cover letter" in GitGitGadget section
MyFirstContribution: reference "The cover letter" in "Preparing Email"
MyFirstContribution: add standalone section on cover letter
MyFirstContribution: add "Anatomy of a Patch Series" section
"git fetch" unnecessarily failed when an unexpected optional
section appeared in the output, which has been corrected.
* jt/fetch-peek-optional-section:
fetch-pack: make unexpected peek result non-fatal
The "--current" option of "git show-branch" should have been made
incompatible with the "--reflog" mode, but this was not enforced,
which has been corrected.
* jc/show-branch-g-current:
show-branch: -g and --current are incompatible
"make coverage-report" without first running "make coverage" did
not produce any meaningful result, which has been corrected.
* ep/coverage-report-wants-test-to-have-run:
Makefile: add a prerequisite to the coverage-report target
"git archive --add-file=<path>" picked up the raw permission bits
from the path and propagated to zip output in some cases, without
normalization, which has been corrected (tar output did not have
this issue).
* jc/archive-add-file-normalize-mode:
archive: do not let on-disk mode leak to zip archives
A bit of test framework fixes with a few fixes to issues found by
valgrind.
* ab/valgrind-fixes:
commit-graph.c: don't assume that stat() succeeds
object-file: fix a unpack_loose_header() regression in 3b6a8db3b0
log test: skip a failing mkstemp() test under valgrind
tests: using custom GIT_EXEC_PATH breaks --valgrind tests
macOS CI jobs have been occasionally flaky due to tentative version
skew between perforce and the homebrew packager. Instead of
failing the whole CI job, just let it skip the p4 tests when this
happens.
* cb/ci-make-p4-optional:
ci: use https, not http to download binaries from perforce.com
ci: reintroduce prevention from perforce being quarantined in macOS
ci: avoid brew for installing perforce
ci: make failure to find perforce more user friendly
Introduce and apply coccinelle rule to discourage an explicit
comparison between a pointer and NULL, and applies the clean-up to
the maintenance track.
* ep/maint-equals-null-cocci:
tree-wide: apply equals-null.cocci
tree-wide: apply equals-null.cocci
contrib/coccinnelle: add equals-null.cocci
"git show :<path>" learned to work better with the sparse-index
feature.
* ds/sparse-colon-path:
rev-parse: integrate with sparse index
object-name: diagnose trees in index properly
object-name: reject trees found in the index
show: integrate with the sparse index
t1092: add compatibility tests for 'git show'
Teach "git stash" to work better with sparse index entries.
* vd/sparse-stash:
unpack-trees: preserve index sparsity
stash: apply stash using 'merge_ort_nonrecursive()'
read-cache: set sparsity when index is new
sparse-index: expose 'is_sparse_index_allowed()'
stash: integrate with sparse index
stash: expand sparse-checkout compatibility testing
"git bisect" was too silent before it is ready to start computing
the actual bisection, which has been corrected.
* cd/bisect-messages-from-pre-flight-states:
bisect: output bisect setup status in bisect log
bisect: output state before we are ready to compute bisection
"git pull" without "--recurse-submodules=<arg>" made
submodule.recurse take precedence over fetch.recurseSubmodules by
mistake, which has been corrected.
* gc/pull-recurse-submodules:
pull: do not let submodule.recurse override fetch.recurseSubmodules
Trace2 documentation updates.
* js/trace2-doc-fixes:
trace2 docs: add missing full stop
trace2 docs: clarify what `varargs` is all about
trace2 docs: fix a JSON formatted example
trace2 docs: surround more terms in backticks
trace2 docs: "printf" is not an English word
trace2 docs: a couple of grammar fixes
"git log --since=X" will stop traversal upon seeing a commit that
is older than X, but there may be commits behind it that is younger
than X when the commit was created with a faulty clock. A new
option is added to keep digging without stopping, and instead
filter out commits with timestamp older than X.
* mv/log-since-as-filter:
log: "--since-as-filter" option is a non-terminating "--since" variant
The temporary files fed to external diff command are now generated
inside a new temporary directory under the same basename.
* rs/external-diff-tempfile:
diff: use mks_tempfile_dt()
tempfile: add mks_tempfile_dt()
New tests for the safe.directory mechanism.
* sg/safe-directory-tests-and-docs:
safe.directory: document and check that it's ignored in the environment
t0033-safe-directory: check when 'safe.directory' is ignored
t0033-safe-directory: check the error message without matching the trash dir
This check was introduced in 8ee5d73137 (Fix fetch/pull when run without
--update-head-ok, 2008-10-13) in order to protect against replacing the ref
of the active branch by mistake, for example by running git fetch origin
master:master.
It was later extended in 8bc1f39f41 (fetch: protect branches checked out
in all worktrees, 2021-12-01) to scan all worktrees.
This operation is very expensive (takes about 30s in my repository) when
there are many tags or branches, and it is executed on every fetch, even if
no local heads are updated at all.
Limit it to protect only refs/heads/* to improve fetch performance.
Signed-off-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a Git server responds to a fetch request, it may send optional
sections before the packfile section. To handle this, the Git client
calls packet_reader_peek() (see process_section_header()) in order to
see what's next without consuming the line.
However, as implemented, Git errors out whenever what's peeked is not an
ordinary line. This is not only unexpected (here, we only need to know
whether the upcoming line is the section header we want) but causes
errors to include the name of a section header that is irrelevant to the
cause of the error. For example, at $DAYJOB, we have seen "fatal: error
reading section header 'shallow-info'" error messages when none of the
repositories involved are shallow.
Therefore, fix this so that the peek returns 1 if the upcoming line is
the wanted section header and nothing else. Because of this change,
reader->line may now be NULL later in the function, so update the error
message printing code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, GitHub prefills the PR description using the commit message
for single-commit PRs. This results in a duplicate commit message below
the three-dash line if the contributor does not empty out the PR
description before submitting, which adds noise for reviewers.
Add a note to that effect in MyFirstContribution.txt.
This partly addresses:
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/gitgitgadget/issues/340
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "Sending Patches via GitGitGadget" section mentions that the PR
title and description will be used as the cover letter, but does not
explain what is a cover letter or what should be included in it.
Refer readers to the new "The cover letter" section added in a previous
commit.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit added a standalone section on the purpose of the
cover letter, drawing inspiration from the existing content of the
"Preparing Email" section.
Adjust "Preparing Email" to reference "The cover letter", to avoid
content duplication.
Also, use the imperative mode for the cover letter subject, as is done
in "The cover letter".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An explanation of the purpose of the cover letter is included in the
"Sending Patches with git send-email" / "Preparing Email" section but is
missing from the "Sending Patches via GitGitGadget" section.
Add a standalone section "The cover letter" under the "Getting Started:
Anatomy of a Patch Series" header to explain what the cover letter is
used for and to draft the cover letter of the 'psuh' topic used in the
tutorial.
For now we mostly copy content from the "Sending Patches with git
send-email" section but do not adjust that section, nor the GGG section,
to reference the new section. This is done in following commits.
Also, adjust the "Preparing Email" Asciidoc anchor to avoid conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before describing how to send patches to the mailing list either with
GitGitGadget or 'git send-email', the MyFirstContribution tutorial
includes a small "Getting Ready to Share" section where the two
different methods are briefly introduced.
Use this section to also describe what a patch series looks like once
submitted, so that readers get an understanding of the end result before
diving into how to accomplish that end result.
Start by copying the "thread overview" section of a recent contribution
from the public-inbox web UI and explaining how each commit is a
separate mail, and point out the cover letter.
Subsequent commits will move the existing description of the purpose of
the cover letter from the 'git send-email' section to this "anatomy"
section.
Also, change the wording in the introductory paragraph to use
"contributions" instead of "patches", since this makes more sense when
talking about GitHub pull requests.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
