Explicitly list $HOME/.config/git/ignore as one of the places you
can use to keep ignore patterns that depend on your personal choice
of tools, e.g. *~ for Emacs users.
* jn/ignore-doc:
gitignore doc: add global gitignore to synopsis
Fix a handful of bugs around interpreting $branch@{upstream}
notation and its lookalike, when $branch part has interesting
characters, e.g. "@", and ":".
* jk/interpret-branch-name-fix:
interpret_branch_name: find all possible @-marks
interpret_branch_name: avoid @{upstream} past colon
interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter
interpret_branch_name: rename "cp" variable to "at"
interpret_branch_name: factor out upstream handling
"git clone" would fail to clone from a repository that has a ref
directly under "refs/", e.g. "refs/stash", because different
validation paths do different things on such a refname. Loosen the
client side's validation to allow such a ref.
* jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname:
fetch-pack: do not filter out one-level refs
"git log --left-right A...B" lost the "leftness" of commits
reachable from A when A is a tag as a side effect of a recent
bugfix. This is a regression in 1.8.4.x series.
* jc/revision-range-unpeel:
revision: propagate flag bits from tags to pointees
revision: mark contents of an uninteresting tree uninteresting
If the git version number consists of less than three period
separated numbers, then the Windows resource file compilation
issues a syntax error:
$ touch git.rc
$ make V=1 git.res
GIT_VERSION = 1.9.rc0
windres -O coff \
-DMAJOR=1 -DMINOR=9 -DPATCH=rc0 \
-DGIT_VERSION="\\\"1.9.rc0\\\"" git.rc -o git.res
C:\msysgit\msysgit\mingw\bin\windres.exe: git.rc:2: syntax error
make: *** [git.res] Error 1
$
Note that -DPATCH=rc0.
The values passed via -DMAJOR=, -DMINOR=, and -DPATCH= are used in
FILEVERSION and PRODUCTVERSION statements, which expect up to four numeric
values. These version numbers are intended for machine consumption. They
are typically inspected by installers to decide whether a file to be
installed is newer than one that exists on the system, but are not used
for much else.
We can be pretty certain that there are no tools that look at these
version numbers, not even the installer of Git for Windows does.
Therefore, to fix the syntax error, fill in only the first two numbers,
which we are guaranteed to find in Git version numbers.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Acked-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'master' of git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk:
gitk: Indent word-wrapped lines in commit display header
gitk: Comply with XDG base directory specification
gitk: Replace "next" and "prev" buttons with down and up arrows
gitk: chmod +x po2msg.sh
gitk: Update copyright dates
gitk: Add Bulgarian translation (304t)
gitk: Fix mistype
In the cases where the lines starting with Precedes:, Follows: and
Branches: in the commit display are long enough to be word-wrapped,
this adds a 1cm margin on the left of the wrapped lines, to make
the display more readable. Suggested by Stephen Rothwell.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
According to profile data, _rev_list and rebuild consume a large
portion of time. Memoize the results of _rev_list and memoize
rebuild internals to avoid subprocess invocation.
When importing 15152 revisions on a LAN, time improved from 10
hours to 3-4 hours.
Signed-off-by: lin zuojian <manjian2006@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Add cross-references between the manpages for git-for-each-ref(1) and
git-show-ref(1).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Write the gitk config data to $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/gitk ($HOME/.config/git/gitk
by default) in line with the XDG specification. This makes it consistent with
git which also follows the spec.
If $HOME/.gitk already exists use that for backward compatibility, so only new
installations are affected.
Signed-off-by: Astril Hayato <astrilhayato@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Users often find that "next" and "prev" do the opposite of what they
expect. For example, "next" moves to the next match down the list, but
that is almost always backwards in time. Replacing the text with arrows
makes it clear where the buttons will take the user.
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The Makefile only runs it using tclsh, but because the fallback po2msg
script has the usual tcl preamble starting with #!/bin/sh it can also
be run directly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The Makefile only runs po/po2msg.sh using tclsh, but because the
script has the usual tcl preamble starting with #!/bin/sh it can also
be run directly.
The Windows git-gui wrapper is usable in-place for the same reason.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
Since 918dbf58, git-gui crashes if started with Tk 8.4. The reason is that
tk < 8.5 does not support -stretch option for panedwindow.
Without the option it's not possible to properly expand the right half -
the commit area is expanded, while desired behavior is to expand the diff
area. So the whole feature should be disabled with Tk
version less than 8.5.
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
"submodule.*.update=checkout", when propagated from .gitmodules to
.git/config, turned into a "submodule.*.update=none", which did not
make much sense.
* fp/submodule-checkout-mode:
git-submodule.sh: 'checkout' is a valid update mode
Fetching from a shallow-cloned repository used to be forbidden,
primarily because the codepaths involved were not carefully vetted
and we did not bother supporting such usage. This attempts to allow
object transfer out of a shallow-cloned repository in a controlled
way (i.e. the receiver become a shallow repository with truncated
history).
* nd/shallow-clone: (31 commits)
t5537: fix incorrect expectation in test case 10
shallow: remove unused code
send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static
git-clone.txt: remove shallow clone limitations
prune: clean .git/shallow after pruning objects
clone: use git protocol for cloning shallow repo locally
send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone via http
receive-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone via http
smart-http: support shallow fetch/clone
remote-curl: pass ref SHA-1 to fetch-pack as well
send-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone
receive-pack: allow pushes that update .git/shallow
connected.c: add new variant that runs with --shallow-file
add GIT_SHALLOW_FILE to propagate --shallow-file to subprocesses
receive/send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone
receive-pack: reorder some code in unpack()
fetch: add --update-shallow to accept refs that update .git/shallow
upload-pack: make sure deepening preserves shallow roots
fetch: support fetching from a shallow repository
clone: support remote shallow repository
...
Finishing touches so that an expected error message will not leak to
the UI.
* jk/pull-rebase-using-fork-point:
pull: suppress error when no remoteref is found
Commit 48059e4 (pull: use merge-base --fork-point when appropriate,
2013-12-08) incorrectly assumes that get_remote_merge_branch will either
yield a non-empty string or return an error, but there are circumstances
where it will yield an empty string.
The previous code then invoked git-rev-list with no arguments, which
results in an error suppressed by redirecting stderr to /dev/null. Now
we invoke git-merge-base with an empty branch name, which also results
in an error. Suppress this in the same way.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subversion serf backend in versions 1.8.5 and below has a bug(*) that the
function creating the descriptor of a file change -- add_file() --
doesn't make a copy of its third argument when storing it on the
returned descriptor. As a result, by the time this field is used (in
transactions of file copying or renaming) it may well be released, and
the memory reused.
One of its possible manifestations is the svn assertion triggering on an
invalid path, with a message
svn_fspath__skip_ancestor: Assertion
`svn_fspath__is_canonical(child_fspath)' failed.
This patch works around this bug, by storing the value to be passed as
the third argument to add_file() in a local variable with the same scope
as the file change descriptor, making sure their lifetime is the same.
* [ew: fixed in Subversion r1553376 as noted by Jonathan Nieder]
Cc: Benjamin Pabst <benjamin.pabst85@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@mail.ru>
The gitignore(5) manpage already documents $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/ignore
but it is easy to forget that it exists. Add a reminder to the
synopsis.
Noticed while looking for a place to put a list of scratch filenames
in the cwd used by one's editor of choice.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the previous fix 895c5ba3 (revision: do not peel tags used in
range notation, 2013-09-19), handle_revision_arg() that processes
command line arguments for the "git log" family of commands no
longer directly places the object pointed by the tag in the pending
object array when it sees a tag object. We used to place pointee
there after copying the flag bits like UNINTERESTING and
SYMMETRIC_LEFT.
This change meant that any flag that is relevant to later history
traversal must now be propagated to the pointed objects (most often
these are commits) while starting the traversal, which is partly
done by handle_commit() that is called from prepare_revision_walk().
We did propagate UNINTERESTING, but did not do so for others, most
notably SYMMETRIC_LEFT. This caused "git log --left-right v1.0..."
(where "v1.0" is a tag) to start losing the "leftness" from the
commit the tag points at.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rev-list --objects ^A^{tree} B^{tree}" ought to mean "I want a
list of objects inside B's tree, but please exclude the objects that
appear inside A's tree".
we see the top-level tree marked as uninteresting (i.e. ^A^{tree} in
the above example) and call mark_tree_uninteresting() on it; this
unfortunately prevents us from recursing into the tree and marking
the objects in the tree as uninteresting.
The reason why "git log ^A A" yields an empty set of commits,
i.e. we do not have a similar issue for commits, is because we call
mark_parents_uninteresting() after seeing an uninteresting commit.
The uninteresting-ness of the commit itself does not prevent its
parents from being marked as uninteresting.
Introduce mark_tree_contents_uninteresting() and structure the code
in handle_commit() in such a way that it makes it the responsibility
of the callchain leading to this function to mark commits, trees and
blobs as uninteresting, and also make it the responsibility of the
helpers called from this function to mark objects that are reachable
from them.
Note that this is a very old bug that probably dates back to the day
when "rev-list --objects" was introduced. The line to clear
tree->object.parsed at the end of mark_tree_contents_uninteresting()
can be removed when this fix is merged to the codebase after
6e454b9a (clear parsed flag when we free tree buffers, 2013-06-05).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we parse a string like "foo@{upstream}", we look for
the first "@"-sign, and check to see if it is an upstream
mark. However, since branch names can contain an @, we may
also see "@foo@{upstream}". In this case, we check only the
first @, and ignore the second. As a result, we do not find
the upstream.
We can solve this by iterating through all @-marks in the
string, and seeing if any is a legitimate upstream or
empty-at mark.
Another strategy would be to parse from the right-hand side
of the string. However, that does not work for the
"empty_at" case, which allows "@@{upstream}". We need to
find the left-most one in this case (and we then recurse as
"HEAD@{upstream}").
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_sha1() cannot currently parse a valid object name like
"HEAD:@{upstream}" (assuming that such an oddly named file
exists in the HEAD commit). It takes two passes to parse the
string:
1. It first considers the whole thing as a ref, which
results in looking for the upstream of "HEAD:".
2. It finds the colon, parses "HEAD" as a tree-ish, and then
finds the path "@{upstream}" in the tree.
For a path that looks like a normal reflog (e.g.,
"HEAD:@{yesterday}"), the first pass is a no-op. We try to
dwim_ref("HEAD:"), that returns zero refs, and we proceed
with colon-parsing.
For "HEAD:@{upstream}", though, the first pass ends up in
interpret_upstream_mark, which tries to find the branch
"HEAD:". When it sees that the branch does not exist, it
actually dies rather than returning an error to the caller.
As a result, we never make it to the second pass.
One obvious way of fixing this would be to teach
interpret_upstream_mark to simply report "no, this isn't an
upstream" in such a case. However, that would make the
error-reporting for legitimate upstream cases significantly
worse. Something like "bogus@{upstream}" would simply report
"unknown revision: bogus@{upstream}", while the current code
diagnoses a wide variety of possible misconfigurations (no
such branch, branch exists but does not have upstream, etc).
However, we can take advantage of the fact that a branch
name cannot contain a colon. Therefore even if we find an
upstream mark, any prefix with a colon must mean that
the upstream mark we found is actually a pathname, and
should be disregarded completely. This patch implements that
logic.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
interpret_branch_name gets passed a "name" buffer to parse,
along with a "namelen" parameter representing its length. If
"namelen" is zero, we fallback to the NUL-terminated
string-length of "name".
However, it does not necessarily follow that if we have
gotten a non-zero "namelen", it is the NUL-terminated
string-length of "name". E.g., when get_sha1() is parsing
"foo:bar", we will be asked to operate only on the first
three characters.
Yet in interpret_branch_name and its helpers, we use string
functions like strchr() to operate on "name", looking past
the length we were given. This can result in us mis-parsing
object names. We should instead be limiting our search to
"namelen" bytes.
There are three distinct types of object names this patch
addresses:
- The intrepret_empty_at helper uses strchr to find the
next @-expression after our potential empty-at. In an
expression like "@:foo@bar", it erroneously thinks that
the second "@" is relevant, even if we were asked only
to look at the first character. This case is easy to
trigger (and we test it in this patch).
- When finding the initial @-mark for @{upstream}, we use
strchr. This means we might treat "foo:@{upstream}" as
the upstream for "foo:", even though we were asked only
to look at "foo". We cannot test this one in practice,
because it is masked by another bug (which is fixed in
the next patch).
- The interpret_nth_prior_checkout helper did not receive
the name length at all. This turns out not to be a
problem in practice, though, because its parsing is so
limited: it always starts from the far-left of the
string, and will not tolerate a colon (which is
currently the only way to get a smaller-than-strlen
"namelen"). However, it's still worth fixing to make the
code more obviously correct, and to future-proof us
against callers with more exotic buffers.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the original version of this function, "cp" acted as a
pointer to many different things. Since the refactoring in
the last patch, it only marks the at-sign in the string.
Let's use a more descriptive variable name.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function checks a few different @{}-constructs. The
early part checks for and dispatches us to helpers for each
construct, but the code for handling @{upstream} is inline.
Let's factor this out into its own function. This makes
interpret_branch_name more readable, and will make it much
simpler to further refactor the function in future patches.
While we're at it, let's also break apart the refactored
code into a few helper functions. These will be useful if we
eventually implement similar @{upstream}-like constructs.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently fetching a one-level ref like "refs/foo" does not
work consistently. The outer "git fetch" program filters the
list of refs, checking each against check_refname_format.
Then it feeds the result to do_fetch_pack to actually
negotiate the haves/wants and get the pack. The fetch-pack
code does its own filter, and it behaves differently.
The fetch-pack filter looks for refs in "refs/", and then
feeds everything _after_ the slash (i.e., just "foo") into
check_refname_format. But check_refname_format is not
designed to look at a partial refname. It complains that the
ref has only one component, thinking it is at the root
(i.e., alongside "HEAD"), when in reality we just fed it a
partial refname.
As a result, we omit a ref like "refs/foo" from the pack
request, even though "git fetch" then tries to store the
resulting ref. If we happen to get the object anyway (e.g.,
because the ref is contained in another ref we are
fetching), then the fetch succeeds. But if it is a unique
object, we fail when trying to update "refs/foo".
We can fix this by just passing the whole refname into
check_refname_format; we know the part we were omitting is
"refs/", which is acceptable in a refname. This at least
makes the checks consistent with each other.
This problem happens most commonly with "refs/stash", which
is the only one-level ref in wide use. However, our test
does not use "refs/stash", as we may later want to restrict
it specifically (not because it is one-level, but because
of the semantics of stashes).
We may also want to do away with the multiple levels of
filtering (which can cause problems when they are out of
sync), or even forbid one-level refs entirely. However,
those decisions can come later; this fixes the most
immediate problem, which is the mismatch between the two.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to use two separate rules for the normal ref resolution
dwimming and dwimming done to decide which remote ref to grab. The
third parameter to refname_match() selected which rules to use.
When these two rules were harmonized in
2011-11-04 dd621df9cd refs DWIMmery: use the same rule for both "git fetch" and others
, ref_fetch_rules was #defined to avoid potential breakages for
in-flight topics.
It is now safe to remove the backwards-compatibility code, so remove
refname_match()'s third parameter, make ref_rev_parse_rules private to
refs.c, and remove ref_fetch_rules entirely.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old text made it sound like macros are only allowed in the
.gitattributes file at the top-level of the working tree. Make it
clear that they are also allowed in $GIT_DIR/info/attributes and in
the global and system-wide gitattributes files.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even though "--[no-]edit" can be used with "git pull", the
explanation of the interaction between this option and the "-m"
option does not make sense within the context of "git pull". Use
the conditional inclusion mechanism to remove this part from "git
pull" documentation, while keeping it for "git merge".
Reported-by: Ivan Zakharyaschev
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
10eb64f5 (git pull manpage: don't include -n from fetch-options.txt,
2008-01-25) introduced a way to exclude some parts of included
source when building git-pull documentation, and later 409b8d82
(Documentation/git-pull: put verbosity options before merge/fetch
ones, 2010-02-24) attempted to use the mechanism to exclude some
parts of merge-options.txt when used from git-pull.txt.
However, the latter did not have an intended effect, because the
macro "git-pull" used to decide if the source is included in
git-pull documentation were defined a bit too late.
Define the macro before it is used to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When working with a remote repository add/pull/push do not accept a
<refspec> as parameter but just a <ref>. They should accept any
well-formatted ref name.
This patch:
- relaxes the check the <ref> argument in "git subtree add <repo>"
(previous code would not accept a ref name that does not exist
locally too, new code only ensures that the ref is well formatted)
- add the same check in "git subtree pull/push" + check the number of
parameters
- update the doc to use <ref> instead of <refspec>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Baire <Anthony.Baire@irisa.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
