The final value of the counter of the "Scanning merged commits"
progress line is always one less than its expected total, e.g.:
Scanning merged commits: 83% (5/6), done.
This happens because while iterating over an array the loop variable
is passed to display_progress() as-is, but while C arrays (and thus
the loop variable) start at 0 and end at N-1, the progress counter
must end at N. Fix this by passing 'i + 1' to display_progress(), like
most other callsites do.
There's an RFC series to add a GIT_TEST_CHECK_PROGRESS=1 mode[1] which
catches this issue in the 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' and
'fetch.writeCommitGraph with submodules' tests in
't5510-fetch.sh'. The GIT_TEST_CHECK_PROGRESS=1 mode is not part of
this series, but future changes to progress.c may add it or similar
assertions to catch this and similar bugs elsewhere.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210620200303.2328957-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Build update for Apple clang.
* cb/makefile-apple-clang:
build: catch clang that identifies itself as "$VENDOR clang"
build: clang version may not be followed by extra words
build: update detect-compiler for newer Xcode version
"git branch -D <branch>" used to refuse to remove a broken branch
ref that points at a missing commit, which has been corrected.
* rs/branch-allow-deleting-dangling:
branch: allow deleting dangling branches with --force
The delayed checkout code path in "git checkout" etc. were chatty
even when --quiet and/or --no-progress options were given.
* mt/quiet-with-delayed-checkout:
checkout: make delayed checkout respect --quiet and --no-progress
"git diff --relative" segfaulted and/or produced incorrect result
when there are unmerged paths.
* dd/diff-files-unmerged-fix:
diff-lib: ignore paths that are outside $cwd if --relative asked
"git maintenance" scheduler fix for macOS.
* js/maintenance-launchctl-fix:
maintenance: skip bootout/bootstrap when plist is registered
maintenance: create `launchctl` configuration using a lock file
mmap() imitation used to call xmalloc() that dies upon malloc()
failure, which has been corrected to just return an error to the
caller to be handled.
* rs/git-mmap-uses-malloc:
compat: let git_mmap use malloc(3) directly
On Windows, files cannot be removed nor renamed if there are still
handles held by a process. To remedy that, we try to release all open
handles to any `.pack` file before e.g. repacking (which would want to
remove the original `.pack` file(s) after it is done).
Since the `read_cache_unmerged()` and/or the `get_oid()` call in `git
pull` can cause `.pack` files to be opened, we need to release the open
handles before calling `git fetch`: the latter process might want to
spawn an auto-gc, which in turn might want to repack the objects.
This commit is similar in spirit to 5bdece0d70 (gc/repack: release
packs when needed, 2018-12-15).
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/3336.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The slab has information about the commit graph. That means that it is
meaningless (and even misleading) when the commit graph was closed.
This seems not to matter currently, but we're about to fix a
Windows-specific bug where `git pull` does not close the object store
before fetching (risking that an implicit auto-gc fails to remove the
now-obsolete pack file(s)), and once we have that bug fix in place, it
does matter: after that bug fix, we will open the object store, do some
stuff with it, then close it, fetch, and then open it again, and do more
stuff. If we close the commit graph without releasing the corresponding
slab, we're hit by a symptom like this in t5520.19:
BUG: commit-reach.c:85: bad generation skip 9223372036854775807
> 3 at 5cd378271655d43a3b4477520014f02213ad1546
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous patches have made "git grep" no longer need to add
submodule ODBs as alternates, at least for the code paths tested in
t7814. Demonstrate this by making adding a submodule ODB as an alternate
fatal in this test.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading the config of a submodule, if reading from a blob, read
using an explicitly specified repository instead of by adding the
submodule's ODB as an alternate and then reading an object from
the_repository.
This makes the "grep --recurse-submodules with submodules without
.gitmodules in the working tree" test in t7814 work when
GIT_TEST_FATAL_REGISTER_SUBMODULE_ODB is true.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Record the repository whenever an OID grep source is created, and teach
the worker threads to explicitly provide the repository when accessing
objects.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, struct repository objects corresponding to submodules are
allocated on the stack in grep_submodule(). This currently works because
they will not be used once grep_submodule() exits, but a subsequent
patch will require these structs to be accessible for longer (perhaps
even in another thread). Allocate them on the heap and clear them only
at the very end.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace an existing parse_object_or_die() call (which implicitly works
on the_repository) with a function call that allows a repository to be
passed in. There is no such direct equivalent to parse_object_or_die(),
but we only need the type of the object, so replace with
oid_object_info().
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
grep_source_init() can create "struct grep_source" objects and,
depending on the value of the type passed, some void-pointer parameters have
different meanings. Because one of these types (GREP_SOURCE_OID) will
require an additional parameter in a subsequent patch, take the
opportunity to increase clarity and type safety by replacing this
function with individual functions for each type.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the parent commit, Git was taught to add submodule ODBs as alternates
lazily, but grep does not use this because it computes the path to add
directly, not going through add_submodule_odb(). Add an equivalent to
add_submodule_odb() that takes the exact ODB path and teach grep to use
it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach Git to add submodule ODBs as alternates to the object store of
the_repository only upon the first access of an object not in
the_repository, and not when add_submodule_odb() is called.
This provides a means of gradually migrating from accessing a
submodule's object through alternates to accessing a submodule's object
by explicitly passing its repository object. Any Git command can declare
that it might access submodule objects by calling add_submodule_odb()
(as they do now), but the submodule ODBs themselves will not be added
until needed, so individual commands and/or combinations of arguments
can be migrated one by one.
[The advantage of explicit repository-object passing is code clarity (it
is clear which repository an object read is from), performance (there is
no need to linearly search through all submodule ODBs whenever an object
is accessed from any repository, whether superproject or submodule), and
the possibility of future features like partial clone submodules (which
right now is not possible because if an object is missing, we do not
know which repository to lazy-fetch into).]
This commit also introduces an environment variable that a test may set
to make the actual registration of alternates fatal, in order to
demonstrate that its codepaths do not need this registration.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Running tests with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 is supposed to turn on the
split index feature and trigger index splitting (mostly) randomly.
Alas, this has been broken since 6e37c8ed3c (read-cache.c: fix writing
"link" index ext with null base oid, 2019-02-13), and
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 hasn't triggered any index splitting since
then.
This patch makes GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX work again, though it doesn't
restore the pre-6e37c8ed3c behavior. To understand the bug, the fix,
and the behavior change we first have to look at how
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX used to work before 6e37c8ed3c:
There are two places where we check the value of
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX, and before 6e37c8ed3c they worked like this:
1) In the lower-level do_write_index(), where, if
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX is enabled, we call init_split_index().
This call merely allocates and zero-initializes
'istate->split_index', but does nothing else (i.e. doesn't fill
the base/shared index with cache entries, doesn't actually
write a shared index file, etc.). Pertinent to this issue, the
hash of the base index remains all zeroed out.
2) In the higher-level write_locked_index(), but only when
'istate->split_index' has already been initialized. Then, if
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX is enabled, it randomly sets the flag that
triggers index splitting later in this function. This
randomness comes from the first byte of the hash of the base
index via an 'if ((first_byte & 15) < 6)' condition.
However, if 'istate->split_index' hasn't been initialized (i.e.
it is still NULL), then write_locked_index() just calls
do_write_locked_index(), which internally calls the above
mentioned do_write_index().
This means that while GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 usually triggered index
splitting randomly, the first two index writes were always
deterministic (though I suspect this was unintentional):
- The initial index write never splits the index.
During the first index write write_locked_index() is called with
'istate->split_index' still uninitialized, so the check in 2) is
not executed. It still calls do_write_index(), though, which
then executes the check in 1). The resulting all zero base
index hash then leads to the 'link' extension being written to
'.git/index', though a shared index file is not written:
$ rm .git/index
$ GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 git update-index --add file
$ test-tool dump-split-index .git/index
own c6ef71168597caec8553c83d9d0048f1ef416170
base 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
100644 d00491fd7e5bb6fa28c517a0bb32b8b506539d4d 0 file
replacements:
deletions:
$ ls -l .git/sharedindex.*
ls: cannot access '.git/sharedindex.*': No such file or directory
- The second index write always splits the index.
When the index written in the previous point is read,
'istate->split_index' is initialized because of the presence of
the 'link' extension. So during the second write
write_locked_index() does run the check in 2), and the first
byte of the all zero base index hash always fulfills the
randomness condition, which in turn always triggers the index
splitting.
- Subsequent index writes will find the 'link' extension with a
real non-zero base index hash, so from then on the check in 2)
is executed and the first byte of the base index hash is as
random as it gets (coming from the SHA-1 of index data including
timestamps and inodes...).
All this worked until 6e37c8ed3c came along, and stopped writing the
'link' extension if the hash of the base index was all zero:
$ rm .git/index
$ GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 git update-index --add file
$ test-tool dump-split-index .git/index
own abbd6f6458d5dee73ae8e210ca15a68a390c6fd7
not a split index
$ ls -l .git/sharedindex.*
ls: cannot access '.git/sharedindex.*': No such file or directory
So, since the first index write with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 doesn't
write a 'link' extension, in the second index write
'istate->split_index' remains uninitialized, and the check in 2) is
not executed, and ultimately the index is never split.
Fix this by modifying write_locked_index() to make sure to check
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX even if 'istate->split_index' is still
uninitialized, and initialize it if necessary. The check for
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX and separate init_split_index() call in
do_write_index() thus becomes unnecessary, so remove it. Furthermore,
add a test to 't1700-split-index.sh' to make sure that
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 will keep working (though only check the
index splitting on the first index write, because after that it will
be random).
Note that this change does not restore the pre-6e37c8ed3c behaviour,
as it will deterministically split the index already on the first
index write. Since GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX is purely a developer aid,
there is no backwards compatibility issue here. The new behaviour did
trigger test failures in 't0003-attributes.sh' and 't1600-index.sh',
though, which have been fixed in preparatory patches in this series.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The sparse index and split index features are said to be currently
incompatible [1], and consequently GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 might
interfere with the test cases exercising the sparse index feature.
Therefore GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX is already explicitly disabled for the
whole of 't1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh'. There are,
however, two other test cases exercising sparse index, namely
'sparse-index enabled and disabled' in
't1091-sparse-checkout-builtin.sh' and 'status succeeds with sparse
index' in 't7519-status-fsmonitor.sh', and these two could fail with
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 as well [2].
Unset GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX and disable the split index in these two
test cases to avoid such interference.
Note that this is the minimal change to merely avoid failures when
these test cases are run with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1. Interestingly,
though, without these changes the 'git sparse-checkout init --cone
--sparse-index' commands still succeed even with split index, and set
all the necessary configuration variables and create the initial
'$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout' file, but the test failures are caused
by later sanity checks finding that the index is not in fact a sparse
index. This indicates that 'git sparse-checkout init --sparse-index'
lacks some error checking and its tests lack coverage related to split
index, but fixing those issues is beyond the scope of this patch
series.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/48e9c3d6-407a-1843-2d91-22112410e3f8@gmail.com/
[2] Neither of these test cases fail at the moment, because
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 is broken and never splits the index, and
it broke long before the sparse index feature was added.
This patch series is about to fix GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX, and then
both test cases mentioned above would fail.
(The diff is best viewed with '--ignore-all-space')
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading a split index git always looks for its referenced shared
base index in the gitdir of the current repository, even when reading
an alternate index specified via GIT_INDEX_FILE, and even when that
alternate index file is the "main" '.git/index' file of an other
repository. However, if that split index and its referenced shared
index files were written by a git command running entirely in that
other repository, then, naturally, the shared index file is written to
that other repository's gitdir. Consequently, a git command
attempting to read that shared index file while running in a different
repository won't be able find it and will error out.
I'm not sure in what use case it is necessary to read the index of one
repository by a git command running in a different repository, but it
is certainly possible to do so, and in fact the test 'bare repository:
check that --cached honors index' in 't0003-attributes.sh' does
exactly that. If GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 were to split the index in
just the right moment [1], then this test would indeed fail, because
the referenced shared index file could not be found.
Let's look for the referenced shared index file not only in the gitdir
of the current directory, but, if the shared index is not there, right
next to the split index as well.
[1] We haven't seen this issue trigger a failure in t0003 yet,
because:
- While GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 is supposed to trigger index
splitting randomly, the first index write has always been
deterministic and it has never split the index.
- That alternate index file in the other repository is written
only once in the entire test script, so it's never split.
However, the next patch will fix GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX, and while
doing so it will slightly change its behavior to always split the
index already on the first index write, and t0003 would always
fail without this patch.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tests in 't1600-index.sh' check that various bogus index version
values are recognized and an appropriate warning message is issued.
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 is supposed to trigger index splitting
randomly, and thus might interfere [1] with these tests: splitting the
index means that two index files are written (the shared base index
and the split '.git/index'), and the same warning message is then
issued twice, failing these tests.
Unset GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX in this test script to avoid such
interference.
[1] There is no such interference at the moment, because, alas,
GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 is broken and never split the index. There
was no such interference in the past (before it broke) either,
because the first index write with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1 never
split the index, only the second write did. A subsequent commit
fixing GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX will have all the details on this.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a helper function in the 't1600-index.sh' test script the stderr
of a 'git add' command is redirected to its stdout, but its stdout is
not redirected anywhere. So apparently this redirection is
unnecessary, remove it.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ds/sparse-index-ignored-files:
sparse-checkout: clear tracked sparse dirs
sparse-index: add SPARSE_INDEX_MEMORY_ONLY flag
attr: be careful about sparse directories
sparse-checkout: create helper methods
sparse-index: use WRITE_TREE_MISSING_OK
sparse-index: silently return when cache tree fails
unpack-trees: fix nested sparse-dir search
sparse-index: silently return when not using cone-mode patterns
t7519: rewrite sparse index test
When changing the scope of a sparse-checkout using cone mode, we might
have some tracked directories go out of scope. The current logic removes
the tracked files from within those directories, but leaves the ignored
files within those directories. This is a bit unexpected to users who
have given input to Git saying they don't need those directories
anymore.
This is something that is new to the cone mode pattern type: the user
has explicitly said "I want these directories and _not_ those
directories." The typical sparse-checkout patterns more generally apply
to "I want files with with these patterns" so it is natural to leave
ignored files as they are. This focus on directories in cone mode
provides us an opportunity to change the behavior.
Leaving these ignored files in the sparse directories makes it
impossible to gain performance benefits in the sparse index. When we
track into these directories, we need to know if the files are ignored
or not, which might depend on the _tracked_ .gitignore file(s) within
the sparse directory. This depends on the indexed version of the file,
so the sparse directory must be expanded.
We must take special care to look for untracked, non-ignored files in
these directories before deleting them. We do not want to delete any
meaningful work that the users were doing in those directories and
perhaps forgot to add and commit before switching sparse-checkout
definitions. Since those untracked files might be code files that
generated ignored build output, also do not delete any ignored files
from these directories in that case. The users can recover their state
by resetting their sparse-checkout definition to include that directory
and continue. Alternatively, they can see the warning that is presented
and delete the directory themselves to regain the performance they
expect.
By deleting the sparse directories when changing scope (or running 'git
sparse-checkout reapply') we regain these performance benefits as if the
repository was in a clean state.
Since these ignored files are frequently build output or helper files
from IDEs, the users should not need the files now that the tracked
files are removed. If the tracked files reappear, then they will have
newer timestamps than the build artifacts, so the artifacts will need to
be regenerated anyway.
Use the sparse-index as a data structure in order to find the sparse
directories that can be safely deleted. Re-expand the index to a full
one if it was full before.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The convert_to_sparse() method checks for the GIT_TEST_SPARSE_INDEX
environment variable or the "index.sparse" config setting before
converting the index to a sparse one. This is for ease of use since all
current consumers are preparing to compress the index before writing it
to disk. If these settings are not enabled, then convert_to_sparse()
silently returns without doing anything.
We will add a consumer in the next change that wants to use the sparse
index as an in-memory data structure, regardless of whether the on-disk
format should be sparse.
To that end, create the SPARSE_INDEX_MEMORY_ONLY flag that will skip
these config checks when enabled. All current consumers are modified to
pass '0' in the new 'flags' parameter.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we integrate the sparse index into more builtins, we occasionally
need to check the sparse-checkout patterns to see if a path is within
the sparse-checkout cone. Create some helper methods that help
initialize the patterns and check for pattern matching to make this
easier.
The existing callers of commands like get_sparse_checkout_patterns() use
a custom 'struct pattern_list' that is not necessarily the one in the
'struct index_state', so there are not many previous uses that could
adopt these helpers. There are just two in builtin/add.c and
sparse-index.c that can use path_in_sparse_checkout().
We add a path_in_cone_mode_sparse_checkout() as well that will only
return false if the path is outside of the sparse-checkout definition
_and_ the sparse-checkout patterns are in cone mode.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When updating the cache tree in convert_to_sparse(), the
WRITE_TREE_MISSING_OK flag indicates that trees might be computed that
do not already exist within the object database. This happens in cases
such as 'git add' creating new trees that it wants to store in
anticipation of a following 'git commit'. If this flag is not specified,
then it might trigger a promisor fetch or a failure due to the object
not existing locally.
Use WRITE_TREE_MISSING_OK during convert_to_sparse() to avoid these
possible reasons for the cache_tree_update() to fail.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If cache_tree_update() returns a non-zero value, then it could not
create the cache tree. This is likely due to a path having a merge
conflict. Since we are already returning early, let's return silently to
avoid making it seem like we failed to write the index at all.
If we remove our dependence on the cache tree within
convert_to_sparse(), then we could still recover from this scenario and
have a sparse index.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The iterated search in find_cache_entry() was recently modified to
include a loop that searches backwards for a sparse directory entry that
matches the given traverse_info and name_entry. However, the string
comparison failed to actually concatenate those two strings, so this
failed to find a sparse directory when it was not a top-level directory.
This caused some errors in rare cases where a 'git checkout' spanned a
diff that modified files within the sparse directory entry, but we could
not correctly find the entry.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While the sparse-index is only enabled when core.sparseCheckoutCone is
also enabled, it is possible for the user to modify the sparse-checkout
file manually in a way that does not match cone-mode patterns. In this
case, we should refuse to convert an index into a sparse index, since
the sparse_checkout_patterns will not be initialized with recursive and
parent path hashsets.
Also silently return if there are no cache entries, which is a simple
case: there are no paths to make sparse!
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The sparse index is tested with the FS Monitor hook and extension since
f8fe49e (fsmonitor: integrate with sparse index, 2021-07-14). This test
was very fragile because it shared an index across sparse and non-sparse
behavior. Since that expansion and contraction could cause the index to
lose its FS Monitor bitmap and token, behavior is fragile to changes in
'git sparse-checkout set'.
Rewrite the test to use two clones of the original repo: full and
sparse. This allows us to also keep the test files (actual, expect,
trace2.txt) out of the repos we are testing with 'git status'.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a performance regression introduced in a587b5a786 (pack-write.c:
extract 'write_rev_file_order', 2021-03-30) and stop needlessly
allocating the "pack_order" array and sorting it with
"pack_order_cmp()", only to throw that work away when we discover that
we're not writing *.rev files after all.
This redundant work was not present in the original version of this
code added in 8ef50d9958 (pack-write.c: prepare to write 'pack-*.rev'
files, 2021-01-25). There we'd call write_rev_file() from
e.g. finish_tmp_packfile(), but we'd "return NULL" early in
write_rev_file() if not doing a "WRITE_REV" or "WRITE_REV_VERIFY".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function to add the `exec` commands to the todo list only needed to
be public API because it was not only used internally by the sequencer,
but also by `git rebase --preserve-merges`.
Now that that mode has been removed, we no longer need that function to
be scoped publicly.
Helped-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the `--preserve-merges` option going away, we no longer need this
function.
Helped-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We no longer support `--preserve-merges`, therefore it does not make
sense to keep mentioning that option, even in code comments.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we no longer have a `--preserve-merges` backend, this comment
needs to be adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was only used by the `--preserve-merges` backend, which we just
removed.
Helped-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
