When git am does an automatic gc it doesn't clean up the rebase-apply
directory until after this has finished. This means that if the user
aborts the gc then future am or rebase operations will report that an
existing operation is in progress, which is undesirable and confusing.
Reported by Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org> through
http://bugs.debian.org/570966
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
23a64c9e (conflict-marker-size: new attribute, 2010-01-16) introduced the
new attribute and also pass the conflict marker size as %L to merge driver
commands. This documents the substitution.
Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix inadvertent breakage from b932705 (git-p4: stream from perforce to
speed up clones, 2009-07-30) in the code that strips the trailing '\n'
from p4 print on a symlink. (In practice, contents is of the form
['target\n', ''].)
Signed-off-by: Evan Powers <evan.powers@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Almost exactly a year ago in 02a6552 (Test fsck a bit harder), I
introduced two testcases that were expecting failure.
However, the only bug was that the testcases wrote *blobs* because I
forgot to pass -t tag to hash-object. Fix this, and then adjust the
rest of the test to properly check the result.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since the "See linkgit:git-config[1]..." paragraph was added to the
description for --untracked-files (d6293d1), the paragraphs for the
following options were indented at the same level as the "See
linkgit:git-config[1]" paragraph. This problem showed up in the
manpages, but not in the HTML documentation.
While this does fix the alignment of the options following
--untracked-files in the manpage, the "See linkgit..." portion of the
description does not retain its previous indentation level in the
manpages, or HTML documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Helwig <jacob.helwig@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we remove a path in a/deep/subdirectory, we should try to
remove as many trailing components as possible (i.e.,
subdirectory, then deep, then a). However, the test for the
return value of rmdir was reversed, so we only ever deleted
at most one level.
The fix is in remove_path, so "apply" and "merge-recursive"
also are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The description for --thin was misleading and downright wrong. Correct
it with some inspiration from the description of index-pack's --fix-thin
and some background information from Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we
may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat
the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be
represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at
worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it
is missing some of the refs they expected to see.
This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just
"refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an
abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note:
- most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where
that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help
indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer
paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming
"refs/heads/").
- in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about
unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs).
- In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed
refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/cherry-pick-reword:
cherry-pick: prettify the advice message
cherry-pick: show commit name instead of sha1
cherry-pick: format help message as strbuf
cherry-pick: refactor commit parsing code
cherry-pick: rewrap advice message
Clarify that git-grep(1) searches only tracked files, and that each
<pathspec> is a pathspec, as in any other ordinary git commands.
Add an example to show a simple use case for searching all .c and .h
files in the current directory and below.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The program can decide at runtime not to use threading even if the support
is compiled in. In such a case, mutexes are not necessary and left
uninitialized. But the code incorrectly tried to take and release the
read_sha1_mutex unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <frekui@gmail.com>
* maint-1.6.6:
dwim_ref: fix dangling symref warning
stash pop: remove 'apply' options during 'drop' invocation
diff: make sure --output=/bad/path is caught
Remove hyphen from "git-command" in two error messages
If we encounter a symref that is dangling, in most cases we will warn
about it. The one exception is a dangling HEAD, as that indicates a
branch yet to be born.
However, the check in dwim_ref was not quite right. If we were fed
something like "HEAD^0" we would try to resolve "HEAD", see that it is
dangling, and then check whether the _original_ string we got was
"HEAD" (which it wasn't in this case). And that makes no sense; the
dangling thing we found was not "HEAD^0" but rather "HEAD".
Fixing this squelches a scary warning from "submodule summary HEAD" (and
consequently "git status" with status.submodulesummary set) in an empty
repo, as the submodule script calls "git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD^0".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'git stash pop' option parsing used to remove the first argument
in --index mode. At the time this was implemented, this first
argument was always --index. However, since the invention of the -q
option in fcdd0e9 (stash: teach quiet option, 2009-06-17) you can
cause an internal invocation of
git stash drop --index
by running
git stash pop -q --index
which then of course fails because drop doesn't know --index.
To handle this, instead let 'git stash apply' decide what the future
argument to 'drop' should be.
Warning: this means that 'git stash apply' must parse all options that
'drop' can take, and deal with them in the same way. This is
currently true for its only option -q.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is not double-backslash we forbid; backslashes are forbidden since
a4c2e699 (Disallow '\' in ref names, 2009-05-08)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, git-archive takes attributes from the tree being archived.
People however often wonder why their attempts to affect the way how the
command archives their tree by changing .gitattributes in their work tree
fail.
Add a bit of explanatory note to tell them how to achieve what they want
to do.
Noticed-by: Francois Marier
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Running filter-branch with --prune-empty and --commit-filter reports:
"Cannot set --prune-empty and --filter-commit at the same time".
Change it to use the correct option name: --commit-filter
Signed-off-by: Jacob Helwig <jacob.helwig@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's hard to see the "how to commit" part of this message,
which users may want to cut and paste. On top of that,
having it in paragraph form means that a really long commit
name may cause ugly wrapping. Let's make it prettier, like:
Automatic cherry-pick failed. After resolving the conflicts,
mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'
and commit the result with:
git commit -c HEAD~23
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we have a conflict, we advise the user to do:
git commit -c $sha1
This works fine, but is unnecessarily confusing and annoying
for the user to type, when:
git commit -c $the_thing_you_called_cherry_pick_with
works just as well.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This gets rid of the fixed-size buffer and an unchecked
sprintf. That sprintf is actually OK as the only
variable-sized thing put in it is an abbreviated sha1, which
is bounded at 40 characters. However, the next patch will
change that to something unbounded.
Note that this function now returns an allocated buffer
instead of a static one; however, it doesn't matter as the
only caller exits immediately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These lines are really just lookup_commit_reference
re-implemented.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current message overflows on an 80-character terminal.
While we're at it, fix the spelling of 'committing'.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rebase calls this same function "--continue", which means
users may be trained to type it. There is no reason to
deprecate --resolved (or -r), so we will keep it as a
synonym.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Shell reports exit status only from the most downstream command
in a pipeline. In these tests, we want to make sure that the
command fails in a controlled way, and produces a correct error
message.
This issue was known by Jay who submitted the patch, and also was
pointed out by Hannes during the review process, but I forgot to
fix it up before applying. Sorry about that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
