We check the results of "rev-list --use-bitmap-index" by comparing it to
the same traversal without the bitmap option. However, this is a little
tricky to do because of some output differences (see the included
comment for details). Let's pull this out into a helper function, since
we'll be adding some similar tests.
While we're at it, let's also try to confirm that the bitmap output did
indeed use bitmaps. Since the code internally falls back to the
non-bitmap path in some cases, the tests are at risk of becoming trivial
noops.
This is a bit fragile, as not all outputs will differ (e.g., looking at
only the commits from a fully-bitmapped pack will end up exactly the
same as the normal traversal order, since it also matches the pack
order). So we'll provide an escape hatch by which tests can disable this
check (which should only be used after manually confirming that bitmaps
kicked in).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The prior commit taught "--count --objects" to work without bitmaps. We
should be able to get the same answer much more quickly with bitmaps.
Note that we punt on the max_count case here. This perhaps _could_ be
made to work if we find all of the boundary commits and treat them as
UNINTERESTING, subtracting them (and their reachable objects) from the
set we return. That implies an actual commit traversal, but we'd still
be faster due to avoiding opening up any trees. Given the complexity and
the fact that anyone is unlikely to want this, it makes sense to just
fall back to the non-bitmap case for now.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current behavior from "rev-list --count --objects" is nonsensical:
we enumerate all of the objects except commits, but then give a count of
commits. This wasn't planned, and is just what the code happens to do.
Instead, let's give the answer the user almost certainly wanted: the
full count of objects.
Note that there are more complicated cases around cherry-marking, etc.
We'll punt on those for now, but let the user know that we can't produce
an answer (rather than giving them something useless).
We'll test both the new feature as well as a vanilla --count of commits,
since that surprisingly doesn't seem to be covered in the existing
tests.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a few operations in rev-list that are optimized for bitmaps.
Rather than having the code inline in cmd_rev_list(), let's move them
into helpers. This not only makes the flow of the main function simpler,
but it lets us replace the complex "can we do the optimization?"
conditionals with a series of early returns from the functions. That
also makes it easy to add comments explaining those conditions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rev-list has refused to use bitmaps with pathspec limiting since
c8a70d3509 (rev-list: disable --use-bitmap-index when pruning commits,
2015-07-01). But this is true not just for rev-list, but for anyone who
calls prepare_bitmap_walk(); the code isn't equipped to handle this
case. We never noticed because the only other callers would never pass
a pathspec limiter.
But let's push the check down into prepare_bitmap_walk() anyway. That's
a more logical place for it to live, as callers shouldn't need to know
the details (and must be prepared to fall back to a regular traversal
anyway, since there might not be bitmaps in the repository).
It would also prepare us for a day where this case _is_ handled, but
that's pretty unlikely. E.g., we could use bitmaps to generate the set
of commits, and then diff each commit to see if it matches the pathspec.
That would be slightly faster than a naive traversal that actually walks
the commits. But you'd probably do better still to make use of the newer
commit-graph feature to make walking the commits very cheap.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--use-bitmap-index" option is usually aspirational: if we have
bitmaps and the request can be fulfilled more quickly using them we'll
do so, but otherwise fall back to a non-bitmap traversal.
The exception is object filtering, which explicitly dies if the two
options are combined. Let's convert this to the usual fallback behavior.
This is a minor convenience for now (since the caller can easily know
that --filter and --use-bitmap-index don't combine), but will become
much more useful as we start to support _some_ filters with bitmaps, but
not others.
The test infrastructure here is bigger than necessary for checking this
one small feature. But it will serve as the basis for more filtering
bitmap tests in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we do a bitmap-aware revision traversal, we create an object_list
for each of the "haves" and "wants" tips. After creating the result
bitmaps these are no longer needed or used, but we never free the list
memory.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When count_object_type() wants to iterate over the bitmap of all objects
of a certain type, we have to pair up OBJ_COMMIT with bitmap->commits,
and so forth. Since we're about to add more code to iterate over these
bitmaps, let's pull the initialization into its own function.
We can also use this to simplify traverse_bitmap_commit_list(). It
accomplishes the same thing by manually passing the object type and the
bitmap to show_objects_for_type(), but using our helper we just need the
object type.
Note there's one small code change here: previously we'd simply return
zero when counting an unknown object type, and now we'll BUG(). This
shouldn't matter in practice, as all of the callers pass in only usual
commit/tree/blob/tag types.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit 5d9324e0f4, reversing
changes made to c58ae96fc4.
The topic turns out to be too buggy for real use.
cf. <f2fe7437-8a48-3315-4d3f-8d51fe4bb8f1@gmail.com>
Further tweak to a "no backslash in indexed paths" for Windows port
we applied earlier.
* js/mingw-loosen-overstrict-tree-entry-checks:
mingw: safeguard better against backslashes in file names
In 224c7d70fa (mingw: only test index entries for backslashes, not tree
entries, 2019-12-31), we relaxed the check for backslashes in tree
entries to check only index entries.
However, the code change was incorrect: it was added to
`add_index_entry_with_check()`, not to `add_index_entry()`, so under
certain circumstances it was possible to side-step the protection.
Besides, the description of that commit purported that all index entries
would be checked when in fact they were only checked when being added to
the index (there are code paths that do not do that, constructing
"transient" index entries).
In any case, it was pointed out in one insightful review at
https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/pull/2437#issuecomment-566771835
that it would be a much better idea to teach `verify_path()` to perform
the check for a backslash. This is safer, even if it comes with two
notable drawbacks:
- `verify_path()` cannot say _what_ is wrong with the path, therefore
the user will no longer be told that there was a backslash in the
path, only that the path was invalid.
- The `git apply` command also calls the `verify_path()` function, and
might have been able to handle Windows-style paths (i.e. with
backslashes instead of forward slashes). This will no longer be
possible unless the user (temporarily) sets `core.protectNTFS=false`.
Note that `git add <windows-path>` will _still_ work because
`normalize_path_copy_len()` will convert the backslashes to forward
slashes before hitting the code path that creates an index entry.
The clear advantage is that `verify_path()`'s purpose is to check the
validity of the file name, therefore we naturally tap into all the code
paths that need safeguarding, also implicitly into future code paths.
The benefits of that approach outweigh the downsides, so let's move the
check from `add_index_entry_with_check()` to `verify_path()`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The english term generation is here not used in the sense of "to
generate" but in the sense of "generations of beings".
This corrects the initial translation from cf4c0c25 (l10n: update German
translation, 2018-12-06).
Fixed-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
The whole submoduleAlternateErrorStrategyDie item is interpreted as
being part of the supporting content of the preceding item. This is
because we don't give a double-colon "::" for the separator, but just a
single colon, ":". Let's fix that.
There are a few other matches for [^:]:\s*$ in Documentation/config, but
I didn't spot any similar bugs among them.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since recent updates to the log graph rendering code, drawing
certain merges started triggering an assert on a condition that
would no longer hold true, which has been corrected.
* ds/graph-assert-fix:
graph: fix lack of color in horizontal lines
graph: drop assert() for merge with two collapsing parents
* https://github.com/prati0100/git-gui:
git-gui: allow opening currently selected file in default app
git-gui: allow closing console window with Escape
git gui: fix branch name encoding error
git-gui: revert untracked files by deleting them
git-gui: update status bar to track operations
git-gui: consolidate naming conventions
In some cases, horizontal lines in rendered graphs can lose their
coloring. This is due to a use of graph_line_addch() instead of
graph_line_write_column(). Using a ternary operator to pick the
character is nice for compact code, but we actually need a column to
provide the color.
Add a test to t4215-log-skewed-merges.sh to prevent regression.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git log --graph" shows a merge commit that has two collapsing
lines, like:
| | | | *
| |_|_|/|
|/| | |/
| | |/|
| |/| |
| * | |
* | | |
we trigger an assert():
graph.c:1228: graph_output_collapsing_line: Assertion
`graph->mapping[i - 3] == target' failed.
The assert was introduced by eaf158f8 ("graph API: Use horizontal
lines for more compact graphs", 2009-04-21), which is quite old.
This assert is trying to say that when we complete a horizontal
line with a single slash, it is because we have reached our target.
It is actually the _second_ collapsing line that hits this assert.
The reason we are in this code path is because we are collapsing
the first line, and in that case we are hitting our target now
that the horizontal line is complete. However, the second line
cannot be a horizontal line, so it will collapse without horizontal
lines. In this case, it is inappropriate to assert that we have
reached our target, as we need to continue for another column
before reaching the target. Dropping the assert is safe here.
The new behavior in 0f0f389f12 (graph: tidy up display of
left-skewed merges, 2019-10-15) caused the behavior change that
made this assertion failure possible. In addition to making the
assert possible, it also changed how multiple edges collapse.
In a larger example, the current code will output a collapse
as follows:
| | | | | | *
| |_|_|_|_|/|\
|/| | | | |/ /
| | | | |/| /
| | | |/| |/
| | |/| |/|
| |/| |/| |
| | |/| | |
| | * | | |
However, the intended collapse should allow multiple horizontal lines
as follows:
| | | | | | *
| |_|_|_|_|/|\
|/| | | | |/ /
| | |_|_|/| /
| |/| | | |/
| | | |_|/|
| | |/| | |
| | * | | |
This behavior is not corrected by this change, but is noted for a later
update.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reported-by: Bradley Smith <brad@brad-smith.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to write split commit-graph file(s) upon fetching computed
bogus value for the parameter used in splitting the resulting
files, which has been corrected.
* ds/commit-graph-set-size-mult:
commit-graph: prefer default size_mult when given zero
"git sparse-checkout list" subcommand learned to give its output in
a more concise form when the "cone" mode is in effect.
* ds/sparse-list-in-cone-mode:
sparse-checkout: document interactions with submodules
sparse-checkout: list directories in cone mode
An earlier update to Git for Windows declared that a tree object is
invalid if it has a path component with backslash in it, which was
overly strict, which has been corrected. The only protection the
Windows users need is to prevent such path (or any path that their
filesystem cannot check out) from entering the index.
* js/mingw-loosen-overstrict-tree-entry-checks:
mingw: only test index entries for backslashes, not tree entries
The sentence wants to talk about the superproject's possesive, not plural form.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Menzel <dev@tomsit.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to "From:" and "Subject:" already mentioned in the
documentation, "Date:" can also appear as an in-body header
to override the value in the e-mail headers. Document it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's core.multiPackIndex, not pack.multiIndex.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This typo was introduced in 94c0956b60 (sparse-checkout: create builtin
with 'list' subcommand, 2019-11-21).
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow opening the currently selected file in its default app by clicking
on its name.
* zs/open-current-file:
git-gui: allow opening currently selected file in default app
In 50f26bd ("fetch: add fetch.writeCommitGraph config setting",
2019-09-02), the fetch builtin added the capability to write a
commit-graph using the "--split" feature. This feature creates
multiple commit-graph files, and those can merge based on a set
of "split options" including a size multiple. The default size
multiple is 2, which intends to provide a log_2 N depth of the
commit-graph chain where N is the number of commits.
However, I noticed during dogfooding that my commit-graph chains
were becoming quite large when left only to builds by 'git fetch'.
It turns out that in split_graph_merge_strategy(), we default the
size_mult variable to 2 except we override it with the context's
split_opts if they exist. In builtin/fetch.c, we create such a
split_opts, but do not populate it with values.
This problem is due to two failures:
1. It is unclear that we can add the flag COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT
with a NULL split_opts.
2. If we have a non-NULL split_opts, then we override the default
values even if a zero value is given.
Correct both of these issues. First, do not override size_mult when
the options provide a zero value. Second, stop creating a split_opts
in the fetch builtin.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
