Use help.c:help_unknown_ref() instead of die() to provide a
friendlier error message before exiting, when one of the refs
specified in a merge is unknown.
Signed-off-by: Vikrant Varma <vikrant.varma94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the user gives an unknown string to a command that expects to
get a ref, we could be more helpful than just saying "that's not a
ref" and die.
Add helper function help_unknown_ref() to take care of displaying an
error message along with a list of suggested refs the user might
have meant. An interaction with "git merge" might go like this:
$ git merge foo
merge: foo - not something we can merge
Did you mean one of these?
origin/foo
upstream/foo
Signed-off-by: Vikrant Varma <vikrant.varma94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comment was copied from hg-fast-export, not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's possible that the previous tip goes away, we should not assume it's
always present. Fortunately we are only using it to calculate the
progress to display to the user, so only that needs to be fixed.
Also, add a test that triggers this issue.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Translate 44 new messages came from git.pot update in
c6bc7d4 (l10n: git.pot: v1.8.3 round 2 (44 new, 12 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
git-merge-tree causes a null pointer dereference when a directory
entry exists in only one or two of the three trees being compared with
no corresponding entry in the other tree(s).
When this happens, we want to handle the entry as a directory and not
attempt to mark it as a file merge. Do this by setting the entries bit
in the directory mask when the entry is missing or when it is a
directory, only performing the file comparison when we know that a file
entry exists.
Reported-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Tested-by: Andreas Jacobsen <andreas@andreasjacobsen.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* fc/remote-bzr:
remote-bzr: avoid bad refs
remote-bzr: convert all unicode keys to str
remote-bzr: access branches only when needed
remote-bzr: delay peer branch usage
remote-bzr: iterate revisions properly
remote-bzr: improve progress reporting
remote-bzr: add option to specify branches
remote-bzr: add custom method to find branches
remote-bzr: improve author sanitazion
remote-bzr: add support for shared repo
remote-bzr: fix branch names
remote-bzr: add support for bzr repos
remote-bzr: use branch variable when appropriate
remote-bzr: fix partially pushed merge
remote-bzr: fixes for branch diverge
remote-bzr: add support to push merges
remote-bzr: always try to update the worktree
remote-bzr: fix order of locking in CustomTree
remote-bzr: delay blob fetching until the very end
remote-bzr: cleanup CustomTree
Versions of fast-export before v1.8.2 throws a bad 'reset' commands
because of a behavior in transport-helper that is not even needed.
We should ignore them, otherwise we will treat them as branches and
fail.
This was fixed in v1.8.2, but some people use this script in older
versions of git.
Also, check if the ref was a tag, and skip it for now.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise some versions of bazaar might barf.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If there's already a remote-helper tracking ref, we can fetch the
SHA-1 to report proper push messages (as opposed to always reporting
[new branch]).
The remote-helper currently can specify the old SHA-1 to avoid this
problem, but there's no point in forcing all remote-helpers to be aware
of git commit ids; they should be able to be agnostic of them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
zsh is smart enough to add the right suffix while completing, there's no
point in trying to do the same as bash.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-C takes a commit object, not a file.
Signed-off-by: Anders Granskogen Bjørnstad <andersgb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rs/pp-user-info-without-extra-allocation:
pretty: remove intermediate strbufs from pp_user_info()
pretty: simplify output line length calculation in pp_user_info()
pretty: simplify input line length calculation in pp_user_info()
* tr/remote-tighten-commandline-parsing:
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
remote: check for superfluous arguments in 'git remote add'
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
Bazaar doesn't seem to be tested for multiple usage of branches, so
resources seem to be leaked all over. Let's try to minimize this by
accessing the Branch objects only when needed.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way we don't need to store the list of all the revisions, which
doesn't seem to be very memory efficient with bazaar's design, for
whatever reason.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
No need to manually count the revisions, and also, this would help to
iterate more properly.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We might not want all the branches. And branch handling in bazaar is
rather tricky, so it's safer to simply specify them.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The official method is incredibly inefficient and slow.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
So that we don't end up with '<None>', and also synchronize it with the
one from remote-hg.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way all the remotes share the same data, so adding multiple
remotes, or renaming them doesn't create extra overhead.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When branches have '/' in their name (aka. sub-branches), bazaar seems
to choke while creating the new directory.
Also, git cannot have both 'foo' and 'foo/bar'.
So let's replace slashes with a plus sign.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In bazaar, a repository can contain multiple branches, and previously we
were supporting only one branch at a time. Now we fetch them all.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There should be no functional changes. Basically we want to reserve the
'repo' variable.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If part of the merge was already pushed, we don't have the blob_marks
available, however, the commits are already stored in bazaar, so we can
use the revision_tree to fetch the contents.
We want to do this only when there's no other option.
There's no easy way to test this.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the branches diverge we want to reset the pointer to where the remote
actually is. Since we can access remote branches just as easily as local
ones, let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to do that, we need to store the marks of every file, so that
they can be fetched when needed. Unfortunately we can't tell bazaar that
nothing changed, we need to send the data so that it can figure it out
by itself.
And since it will be requesting a bunch of information by the file_id,
it's better to have a helper dict (rev_files), so that we can fetch it
quickly.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It doesn't seem to make any difference, but revision_tree() requires a
lock.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Might be more efficient, but the real reason to use the marks will be
revealed in upcoming patches.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the !delta_data error path of unpack_entry(), we run free(base).
This became a window for use-after-free() in abe601b (sha1_file:
remove recursion in unpack_entry, 2013-03-27), as follows:
Before abe601b, we got the 'base' from cache_or_unpack_entry(..., 0);
keep_cache=0 tells it to also remove that entry. So the 'base' is at
this point not cached, and freeing it in the error path is the right
thing.
After abe601b, the structure changed: we use a three-phase approach
where phase 1 finds the innermost base or a base that is already in
the cache. In phase 3 we therefore know that all bases we unpack are
not part of the delta cache yet. (Observe that we pop from the cache
in phase 1, so this is also true for the very first base.) So we make
no further attempts to look up the bases in the cache, and just call
add_delta_base_cache() on every base object we have assembled.
But the !delta_data error path remained unchanged, and now calls
free() on a base that has already been entered in the cache. This
means that there is a use-after-free if we later use the same base
again.
So remove that free(); we are still going to use that data.
Reported-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
