c45af94dbc
We normally try to avoid having two auto-gc operations run at the same time, because it wastes resources. This was done long ago in 64a99eb47 (gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given, 2013-08-08). When we do a detached auto-gc, we run the ref-related commands _before_ detaching, to avoid confusing lock contention. This was done by 62aad1849 (gc --auto: do not lock refs in the background, 2014-05-25). These two features do not interact well. The pre-detach operations are run before we check the gc.pid lock, meaning that on a busy repository we may run many of them concurrently. Ideally we'd take the lock before spawning any operations, and hold it for the duration of the program. This is tricky, though, with the way the pid-file interacts with the daemonize() process. Other processes will check that the pid recorded in the pid-file still exists. But detaching causes us to fork and continue running under a new pid. So if we take the lock before detaching, the pid-file will have a bogus pid in it. We'd have to go back and update it with the new pid after detaching. We'd also have to play some tricks with the tempfile subsystem to tweak the "owner" field, so that the parent process does not clean it up on exit, but the child process does. Instead, we can do something a bit simpler: take the lock only for the duration of the pre-detach work, then detach, then take it again for the post-detach work. Technically, this means that the post-detach lock could lose to another process doing pre-detach work. But in the long run this works out. That second process would then follow-up by doing post-detach work. Unless it was in turn blocked by a third process doing pre-detach work, and so on. This could in theory go on indefinitely, as the pre-detach work does not repack, and so need_to_gc() will continue to trigger. But in each round we are racing between the pre- and post-detach locks. Eventually, one of the post-detach locks will win the race and complete the full gc. So in the worst case, we may racily repeat the pre-detach work, but we would never do so simultaneously (it would happen via a sequence of serialized race-wins). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks