Turn many file-scope private symbols to static to reduce the
global namespace contamination.
* jc/make-static:
sequencer.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
ident.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
trace.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
wt-status.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
read-cache.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
strbuf.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
sha1-array.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
symlinks.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
notes.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
rerere.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
graph.c: mark private file-scope symbols as static
diff.c: mark a private file-scope symbol as static
commit.c: mark a file-scope private symbol as static
builtin/notes.c: mark file-scope private symbols as static
Add '--conflict' option to git-p4 subcommand to specify what action
to take when conflicts are found during 'p4 submit'.
* pw/p4-submit-conflicts:
git-p4: add submit --conflict option and config varaiable
git p4: add submit --prepare-p4-only option
git p4: add submit --dry-run option
git p4: accept -v for --verbose
git p4: revert deleted files after submit cancel
git p4: rearrange submit template construction
git p4: test clean-up after failed submit, fix added files
git p4: standardize submit cancel due to unchanged template
git p4: move conflict prompt into run, add [q]uit input
git p4: remove submit failure options [a]pply and [w]rite
git p4: gracefully fail if some commits could not be applied
git p4 test: remove bash-ism of combined export/assignment
After "git cherry-pick -s" gave control back to the user asking
help to resolve conflicts, concluding "git commit" needs to be run
with "-s" if the user wants to sign it off, but the command should
be able to remember that.
* mv/cherry-pick-s:
cherry-pick: don't forget -s on failure
The status report from "git fetch", when messages like 'up-to-date'
are translated, did not align the branch names well.
* nd/fetch-status-alignment:
fetch: align per-ref summary report in UTF-8 locales
The attribute system may be asked for a path that itself or its
leading directories no longer exists in the working tree, and it is
fine if we cannot open .gitattribute file in such a case. Failure
to open per-directory .gitattributes with error status other than
ENOENT and ENOTDIR should be diagnosed.
* jk/config-warn-on-inaccessible-paths:
attr: failure to open a .gitattributes file is OK with ENOTDIR
warn_on_inaccessible(): a helper to warn on inaccessible paths
attr: warn on inaccessible attribute files
gitignore: report access errors of exclude files
config: warn on inaccessible files
Avoid confusion in compound sentence about the start of the commit set
and the depth measure. Use two sentences.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The note that explains that changes introduced by removed commits are
preserved should be placed directly after the paragraph that describes
such commits removal. Otherwise the reference to "the commits" appears
out of context.
Also the big example that follows "Consider this history" is about
rewriting part of the history DAG. Move the paragraph that
describes the operation close to it.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
t/perf: add "trash directory" to .gitignore
Add missing -z to git check-attr usage text for consistency with man page
git-jump: ignore (custom) prefix in diff mode
Documentation: indent-with-non-tab uses "equivalent tabs" not 8
completion: add --no-edit to git-commit
Code simplification and clarification.
* mh/fetch-filter-refs:
test-string-list.c: Fix some sparse warnings
fetch-pack: eliminate spurious error messages
cmd_fetch_pack(): simplify computation of return value
fetch-pack: report missing refs even if no existing refs were received
cmd_fetch_pack(): return early if finish_connect() fails
filter_refs(): simplify logic
filter_refs(): build refs list as we go
filter_refs(): delete matched refs from sought list
fetch_pack(): update sought->nr to reflect number of unique entries
filter_refs(): do not check the same sought_pos twice
Change fetch_pack() and friends to take string_list arguments
fetch_pack(): reindent function decl and defn
Rename static function fetch_pack() to http_fetch_pack()
t5500: add tests of fetch-pack --all --depth=N $URL $REF
t5500: add tests of error output for missing refs
Earlier we made the diffstat summary line that shows the number of
lines added/deleted localizable, but it was found irritating having
to see them in various languages on a list whose discussion language
is English.
The original had trivial thinko in reverting Q_(), which has been
fixed.
* nd/maint-diffstat-summary:
Revert diffstat back to English
The attribute system may be asked for a path that itself or its
leading directories no longer exists in the working tree. Failure
to open per-directory .gitattributes with error status other than
ENOENT and ENOTDIR are diagnosed.
* jk/config-warn-on-inaccessible-paths:
attr: failure to open a .gitattributes file is OK with ENOTDIR
Update parts of document that talked about "first line of commit
log" to say "title of commit" with definition of what that "title"
is.
* jw/doc-commit-title:
Documentation: describe subject more precisely
* mh/string-list:
api-string-list.txt: initialize the string_list the easy way
string_list: add a function string_list_longest_prefix()
string_list: add a new function, string_list_remove_duplicates()
string_list: add a new function, filter_string_list()
string_list: add two new functions for splitting strings
string_list: add function string_list_append_nodup()
"git blame MAKEFILE" run in a history that has "Makefile" but not
"MAKEFILE" should say "No such file MAKEFILE in HEAD", but got
confused on a case insensitive filesystem and failed to do so.
Even during a conflicted merge, "git blame $path" always meant to
blame uncommitted changes to the "working tree" version; make it
more useful by showing cleanly merged parts as coming from the other
branch that is being merged.
* jc/maint-blame-no-such-path:
blame: allow "blame file" in the middle of a conflicted merge
blame $path: avoid getting fooled by case insensitive filesystems
Matching the default file prefix b/ does not yield any results if config
option diff.noprefix or diff.mnemonicprefix is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Mischa POSLAWSKY <git@shiar.nl>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the documentation of the core.whitespace option
"indent-with-non-tab" to correctly reflect that it catches the use of
spaces instead of the equivalent tabs, rather than a fixed number.
Signed-off-by: Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows specifying what to do when a conflict
happens when applying a commit to p4, automating the
interactive prompt.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option can be used to prepare the client workspace for
submission, only. It does not invoke the final "p4 submit".
A message describes how to proceed, either submitting the
changes or reverting.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new option, "git p4 submit --dry-run" can be used to verify
what commits and labels would be moved into p4.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The short form "-v" is common in many git commands as an
alias for "--verbose".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user can decide not to continue with a submission,
by not saving the p4 submit template, then answering "no" to
the "Submit anyway?" prompt. In this case, be sure to
return the p4 client to its initial state.
Deleted files were not reverted; fix this and test all cases.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Put all items in order as they appear, and add comments.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test a variety of cases where a patch failed to apply to
p4 and had to be cleaned up.
If the patch failed to apply cleanly, do not try to remove
to-be-added files, as they have not really been added yet.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When editing the submit template, if no change was made to it,
git p4 offers a prompt "Submit anyway?". Answering "no" cancels
the submit.
Previously, a "no" answer behaves like a "[s]kip" answer to the
failed-patch prompt, in that it proceeded to try to apply the
rest of the commits. Instead, put users back into the new
"[s]kip / [c]ontinue" loop so that they can decide. This makes
both cases of patch failure behave identically.
The return code of git p4 after a "no" answer is now the same
as that for a "skip" due to failed patch; update a test to
understand this.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When applying a commit to the p4 workspace fails, a prompt
asks what to do next. This belongs up in run() instead
of in applyCommit(), where run() can notice, for instance,
that the prompt is unnecessary because this is the last commit.
Offer two options about how to continue at conflict: [s]kip or
[q]uit. Having an explicit "quit" option gives git p4 a chance
to clean up, show the applied-commit summary, and do tag export.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a patch failed to apply, these interactive options offered
to:
1) apply the patch anyway, leaving reject (.rej) files around, or,
2) write the patch to a file (patch.txt)
In both cases it suggested to invoke "git p4 submit --continue",
an unimplemented option.
While manually fixing the rejects and submitting the result might
work, there are many steps that must be done to the job properly:
* apply patch
* invoke p4 add and delete
* change executable bits
* p4 sync -f renamed/copied files
* extract commit message into p4 change description and
move Jobs lines out of description section
* set changelist owner for --preserve-user
Plus the following manual sync/rebase will cause conflicts too,
which must be resolved once again.
Drop these workflows. Instead users should do a sync/rebase in
git, fix the conflicts there, and do a clean "git p4 submit".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a commit fails to apply cleanly to the p4 tree, an interactive
prompt asks what to do next. In all cases (skip, apply, write),
the behavior after the prompt had a few problems.
Change it so that it does not claim erroneously that all commits
were applied. Instead list the set of the patches under
consideration, and mark with an asterisk those that were
applied successfully. Like this example:
Applying 592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
...
Unfortunately applying the change failed!
What do you want to do?
[s]kip this patch / [a]pply the patch forcibly and with .rej files / [w]rite the patch to a file (patch.txt) s
Skipping! Good luck with the next patches...
//depot/file1#4 - was edit, reverted
Applying b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
...
Change 6 submitted.
Applied only the commits marked with '*':
592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
* b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
Do not try to sync and rebase unless all patches were applied.
If there was a conflict during the submit, there is sure to be one
at the rebase. Let the user to do the sync and rebase manually.
This changes how a couple tets in t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh behave:
- git p4 now does not leave files open and edited in the
client
- If a git commit contains a change to a file that was
deleted in p4, the test used to check that the sync/rebase
loop happened after the failure to apply the change. Since
now sync/rebase does not happen after failure, do not test
this. Normal rebase machinery, outside of git p4, will let
rebase --skip work.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, sparse complains as follows:
SP test-string-list.c
test-string-list.c:10:6: warning: symbol 'parse_string_list' was not \
declared. Should it be static?
test-string-list.c:18:6: warning: symbol 'write_list' was not \
declared. Should it be static?
test-string-list.c:25:6: warning: symbol 'write_list_compact' was not \
declared. Should it be static?
test-string-list.c:38:5: warning: symbol 'prefix_cb' was not \
declared. Should it be static?
In order to suppress the warnings, since the above symbols do not
need more than file scope, we simply include the static modifier
in their declaration.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
