Our revision number sent to SVN is set to the last revision we
committed if we've made any previous commits in a dcommit
invocation.
Although our SVN Editor code uses the delta of two (old) trees
to generate information to send upstream, it'll still send
complete resultant files upstream; even if the tree they're
based against is out-of-date.
The combination of sending a file that does not include the
latest changes, but set with a revision number of a commit we
just made will cause SVN to accept the resultant file even if it
was generated against an old tree.
More trouble was caused when fixing this because we were
rebasing uncessarily at times. We used git-diff-tree to check
the imported SVN revision against our HEAD, not the last tree we
committed to SVN. The unnecessary rebasing caused merge commits
upstream to SVN to fail.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This avoids to launch the pager when git blame fails for any reason.
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation states for the -u option that underscores in tag and
branch names are converted to dots, but this was actually implemented
for the tag names only.
Kurt Roeckx reported this through
http://bugs.debian.org/446495
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-rebase used to fail when run from a path containing a space.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
They are already set and exoprted by sourcing ./test-lib.sh
in all test scripts.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation quotes commit messages 14 times with double-quotes, and 7
times with single-quotes. The patch turns everything to double-quotes.
A nice side effect is that documentation becomes more Windoze-friendly
as AFAIK single quotes won't work there.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The escaped were ending up verbatim in the generated documentation.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit a3c8ab30a5 by Matt McCutchen
"gitweb: snapshot cleanups & support for offering multiple formats"
introduced new format of $feature{'snapshot'}{'default'} value. Update
"Config file example" in gitweb/INSTALL accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously commits without parents would fail to export with a
message indicating that the commits had more than one parent.
Instead we should use the --root option for git-diff-tree in
place of a parent.
Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-rebase--interactive.sh used to pass all parents of a merge commit to
git-merge, which means that we have at least 3 heads to merge: HEAD,
first parent and second parent. So 3-way merge strategies like recursive
wouldn't work.
Fortunately, we have checked out the first parent right before the merge
anyway, so that is HEAD. Therefore we can drop simply it from the list
of parents, making 3-way strategies work for merge commits with only
two parents.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-cherry-pick doesn't support a strategy paramter, so don't pass one.
This means that --strategy for interactive rebases is a no-op for
anything but merge commits, but that's still better than being broken. A
correct fix would probably need to port the --merge behaviour from plain
git-rebase.sh, but I have no clue how to integrate that cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For the --strategy/-s option, git-rebase--interactive.sh dropped the
parameter which it was trying to parse.
Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It might be a sign of source code management gone bad, but when two branches
has diverged almost beyond recognition and time has come for the branches to
merge, the user is going to need all the help his tool can give him. Honoring
diff.renamelimit has great potential as a painkiller in such situations.
The painkiller effect could have been achieved by e.g. 'merge.renamelimit',
but the flexibility gained by a separate option is questionable: our user
would probably expect git to detect renames equally good when merging as
when diffing (I known I did).
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A failed cherry-pick (and friend) currently says:
|Automatic cherry-pick failed. After resolving the conflicts,
|mark the corrected paths with 'git-add <paths>'
|and commit the result.
This can obviously be displayed on two lines only.
While at it, change "git-add" to "git add".
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Historically "git merge" took its command line arguments in a
rather strange order. Document the historical syntax, and also
document clearly that it is not encouraged in new scripts.
There is no reason to deprecate the historical syntax, as the
current code can sanely tell which syntax the caller is using,
and existing scripts by people do use the historical syntax.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
4491e62ae9 (Prevent send-pack from
segfaulting when a branch doesn't match) is hereby cherry-picked
back to 'maint'.
If we can't find a source match, and we have no destination, we
need to abort the match function early before we try to match
the destination against the remote.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The called function merge_trees() sets its *result, to which the
address of the variable mrtree in merge() function is passed,
only when index_only is set. But that is Ok as the function
uses the value in the variable only under index_only iteration.
However, recent gcc does not realize this. Work it around by
adding a fake initializer.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the recent gcc, we get:
sha1_file.c: In check_packed_git_:
sha1_file.c:527: warning: assuming signed overflow does not
occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false
sha1_file.c:527: warning: assuming signed overflow does not
occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false
for a piece of code that tries to make sure that off_t is large
enough to hold more than 2^32 offset. The test tried to make
sure these do not wrap-around:
/* make sure we can deal with large pack offsets */
off_t x = 0x7fffffffUL, y = 0xffffffffUL;
if (x > (x + 1) || y > (y + 1)) {
but gcc assumes it can do whatever optimization it wants for a
signed overflow (undefined behaviour) and warns about this
construct.
Follow Linus's suggestion to check sizeof(off_t) instead to work
around the problem.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
prune_directory and fill_directory allocated one byte per pathspec and never
freed it.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code generating perl/Makefile from Makefile.PL was causing trouble
because it didn't considered NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER and ran makemaker
unconditionally, rewriting perl.mak. Makemaker is FUBAR in ActiveState Perl,
and perl/Makefile has a replacement for it.
Besides, a changed Git.pm is *NOT* a reason to rebuild all the perl scripts,
so remove the dependency too.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> writes:
> piper:~> git remote show origin
> * remote origin
> URL: ssh://git.madduck.net/~/git/etc/mailplate.git
> Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/stow/git/bin/git-remote line 248.
This is because there might not be branch.<name>.remote defined but
the code unconditionally dereferences $branch->{$name}{'REMOTE'} and
compares with another string.
Tested-by: Martin F Krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ok, so on the kernel list, some people noticed that "git log --follow"
doesn't work too well with some files in the x86 merge, because a lot of
files got renamed in very special ways.
In particular, there was a pattern of doing single commits with renames
that looked basically like
- rename "filename.h" -> "filename_64.h"
- create new "filename.c" that includes "filename_32.h" or
"filename_64.h" depending on whether we're 32-bit or 64-bit.
which was preparatory for smushing the two trees together.
Now, there's two issues here:
- "filename.c" *remained*. Yes, it was a rename, but there was a new file
created with the old name in the same commit. This was important,
because we wanted each commit to compile properly, so that it was
bisectable, so splitting the rename into one commit and the "create
helper file" into another was *not* an option.
So we need to break associations where the contents change too much.
Fine. We have the -B flag for that. When we break things up, then the
rename detection will be able to figure out whether there are better
alternatives.
- "git log --follow" didn't with with -B.
Now, the second case was really simple: we use a different "diffopt"
structure for the rename detection than the basic one (which we use for
showing the diffs). So that second case is trivially fixed by a trivial
one-liner that just copies the break_opt values from the "real" diffopts
to the one used for rename following. So now "git log -B --follow" works
fine:
diff --git a/tree-diff.c b/tree-diff.c
index 26bdbdd..7c261fd 100644
--- a/tree-diff.c
+++ b/tree-diff.c
@@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ static void try_to_follow_renames(struct tree_desc *t1, struct tree_desc *t2, co
diff_opts.detect_rename = DIFF_DETECT_RENAME;
diff_opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT;
diff_opts.single_follow = opt->paths[0];
+ diff_opts.break_opt = opt->break_opt;
paths[0] = NULL;
diff_tree_setup_paths(paths, &diff_opts);
if (diff_setup_done(&diff_opts) < 0)
however, the end result does *not* work. Because our diffcore-break.c
logic is totally bogus!
In particular:
- it used to do
if (base_size < MINIMUM_BREAK_SIZE)
return 0; /* we do not break too small filepair */
which basically says "don't bother to break small files". But that
"base_size" is the *smaller* of the two sizes, which means that if some
large file was rewritten into one that just includes another file, we
would look at the (small) result, and decide that it's smaller than the
break size, so it cannot be worth it to break it up! Even if the other
side was ten times bigger and looked *nothing* like the samell file!
That's clearly bogus. I replaced "base_size" with "max_size", so that
we compare the *bigger* of the filepair with the break size.
- It calculated a "merge_score", which was the score needed to merge it
back together if nothing else wanted it. But even if it was *so*
different that we would never want to merge it back, we wouldn't
consider it a break! That makes no sense. So I added
if (*merge_score_p > break_score)
return 1;
to make it clear that if we wouldn't want to merge it at the end, it
was *definitely* a break.
- It compared the whole "extent of damage", counting all inserts and
deletes, but it based this score on the "base_size", and generated the
damage score with
delta_size = src_removed + literal_added;
damage_score = delta_size * MAX_SCORE / base_size;
but that makes no sense either, since quite often, this will result in
a number that is *bigger* than MAX_SCORE! Why? Because base_size is
(again) the smaller of the two files we compare, and when you start out
from a small file and add a lot (or start out from a large file and
remove a lot), the base_size is going to be much smaller than the
damage!
Again, the fix was to replace "base_size" with "max_size", at which
point the damage actually becomes a sane percentage of the whole.
With these changes in place, not only does "git log -B --follow" work for
the case that triggered this in the first place, ie now
git log -B --follow arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
actually gives reasonable results. But I also wanted to verify it in
general, by doing a full-history
git log --stat -B -C
on my kernel tree with the old code and the new code.
There's some tweaking to be done, but generally, the new code generates
much better results wrt breaking up files (and then finding better rename
candidates). Here's a few examples of the "--stat" output:
- This:
include/asm-x86/Kbuild | 2 -
include/asm-x86/debugreg.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/asm-x86/debugreg_32.h | 64 ---------------------------------
include/asm-x86/debugreg_64.h | 65 ---------------------------------
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
Becomes:
include/asm-x86/Kbuild | 2 -
include/asm-x86/{debugreg_64.h => debugreg.h} | 9 +++-
include/asm-x86/debugreg_32.h | 64 -------------------------
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
- This:
include/asm-x86/bug.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/asm-x86/bug_32.h | 37 -------------------------------------
include/asm-x86/bug_64.h | 34 ----------------------------------
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
Becomes
include/asm-x86/{bug_64.h => bug.h} | 20 +++++++++++++-----
include/asm-x86/bug_32.h | 37 -----------------------------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Now, in some other cases, it does actually turn a rename into a real
"delete+create" pair, and then the diff is usually bigger, so truth in
advertizing: it doesn't always generate a nicer diff. But for what -B was
meant for, I think this is a big improvement, and I suspect those cases
where it generates a bigger diff are tweakable.
So I think this diff fixes a real bug, but we might still want to tweak
the default values and perhaps the exact rules for when a break happens.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> If DT_UNKNOWN exists, then we have to do a stat() of some form to
> find out the right type.
That happened in the case of a pathname that was ignored, and we did
not ask for "dir->show_ignored". That test used to be *together*
with the "DTYPE(de) != DT_DIR", but splitting the two tests up
means that we can do that (common) test before we even bother to
calculate the real dtype.
Of course, that optimization only matters for systems that don't
have, or don't fill in DTYPE properly.
I also clarified the real relationship between "exclude" and
"dir->show_ignored". It used to do
if (exclude != dir->show_ignored) {
..
which wasn't exactly obvious, because it triggers for two different
cases:
- the path is marked excluded, but we are not interested in ignored
files: ignore it
- the path is *not* excluded, but we *are* interested in ignored
files: ignore it unless it's a directory, in which case we might
have ignored files inside the directory and need to recurse
into it).
so this splits them into those two cases, since the first case
doesn't even care about the type.
I also made a the DT_UNKNOWN case a separate helper function,
and added some commentary to the cases.
Linus
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* 'maint' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Don't display CR within console windows
git-gui: Handle progress bars from newer gits
git-gui: Correctly report failures from git-write-tree
git-gui: accept versions containing text annotations, like 1.5.3.mingw.1
git-gui: Don't crash when starting gitk from a browser session
git-gui: Allow gitk to be started on Cygwin with native Tcl/Tk
git-gui: Ensure .git/info/exclude is honored in Cygwin workdirs
git-gui: Handle starting on mapped shares under Cygwin
git-gui: Display message box when we cannot find git in $PATH
git-gui: Avoid using bold text in entire gui for some fonts
receive-pack is only executed remotely so when
reporting errors, say so.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The arguments to the "Not a blob" die call in file_change_m were
transposed, so that the command was printed as the type, and the type
as the command. Switch them around so that the error message comes
out correctly.
Signed-off-by: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Git progress bars from tools like git-push and git-fetch use CR
to skip back to the start of the current line and redraw it with
an updated progress. We were doing this in our Tk widget but had
failed to skip the CR, which Tk doesn't draw well.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Post Git 1.5.3 a new style progress bar has been introduced that
uses only one line rather than two. The formatting of the completed
and total section is also slightly different so we must adjust our
regexp to match. Unfortunately both styles are in active use by
different versions of Git so we need to look for both.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If git-write-tree fails (such as if the index file is currently
locked and it wants to write to it) we were not getting the error
message as $tree_id was always the empty string so we shortcut
through the catch and never got the output from stderr.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
For the manpage, avoid generating an em dash in code.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When matching source and destination refs, we were failing
to pull the 'force' parameter from wildcard refspecs (but
not explicit ones) and attach it to the ref struct.
This adds a test for explicit and wildcard refspecs; the
latter fails without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
In 89d750bf6f I got a little too
aggressive with changing "git diff" to "git diff-tree". This is
shown to the user, who expects to see a full diff on their console,
and will want to see the output of their custom diff drivers (if
any) as the whole point of this call site is to show the diff to
the end-user.
Noticed by Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git-stash needs to restrict itself to plumbing when running automated
diffs as part of its operation as the user may have configured a
custom diff driver that opens an interactive UI for certain/all
files. Doing that during scripted actions is very unfriendly to
the end-user and may cause git-stash to fail to work.
Reported by Johannes Sixt
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
git may segfault if gitattributes contains an invalid
entry. A test is added to t0020 that triggers the segfault.
The parsing code is fixed to avoid the crash.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I found I needed NI_MAXSERV as it is defined in netdb.h, which is
not included by daemon.c. Rather than including the whole header
we can define a reasonable fallback value.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
CVS gets understandably upset if you try and add a subdirectory
before it's parent directory. This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Ok, what is going on is:
- append_fetch_head() looks up the SHA1 for all heads (including tags):
if (get_sha1(head, sha1))
return error("Not a valid object name: %s", head);
- it then wants to check if it's a candidate for merging (because
fetching also does the whole "list which heads to merge" in case
it is going to be part of a "pull"):
commit = lookup_commit_reference(sha1);
if (!commit)
not_for_merge = 1;
- and that "lookup_commit_reference()" is just very vocal about the
case where it fails. It really shouldn't be, and it shouldn't
affect the actual end result, but that basically explains why
you get that scary warning.
In short, the warning is just bogus, and should be harmless, but
I agree that it's ugly. I think the appended patch should fix it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
